Hello,
Sending MS-MPC syslogs to more than 1 destination server DIRECTLY FROM
NPU ("service-set <> syslog host" stanza) is not supported APART from
JFLOWv9 NAT syslogs.
You could send MS-MPC syslogs initially to RE and then RE will replicate
to more than 1 destination server. With PBA, and rela
I’d also add Aerohive to the mix of consideration if they are still out there
doing it. Had good luck with their products and great support.
> On May 26, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/26/16 8:45 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 07:35:35PM +0530, Mehul
> Colton Conor
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:36 PM
> To: Mark Tinka
> Cc: Phil Rosenthal; Juniper List
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] RE-S-X6-64G-BB
>
> Alright, so if not upgrading from a previous Juniper box (buying new), would
> you at this point not take the newer RE's that are the same price as the
On 5/26/16 8:45 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 07:35:35PM +0530, Mehul Gajjar wrote:
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> Can someone tell me how juniper in wireless compare to Aruba and cisco.
>
> If for an office or similar I would just look at UniFi. Works well,
> gives good intellige
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 07:35:35PM +0530, Mehul Gajjar wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> Can someone tell me how juniper in wireless compare to Aruba and cisco.
If for an office or similar I would just look at UniFi. Works well,
gives good intelligence and you can do automation against it.
Thanks..got it
On 26-May-2016 8:05 pm, "Zoltan Anthony Ori"
wrote:
> Juniper hasn't been successful in wifi. They currently promote Ruckus, but
> Aerohive is a partner as well. Cisco gets expensive to own and isn't as
> advanced and flexible as products by Aerohive, Aruba, and Extreme. I can't
>
Hi.
Juniper now doesn't have WiFi in product portfolio. Check Junipers partner
site:
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/partners/technology-alliances/wireless/
2016-05-26 16:05 GMT+02:00 Mehul Gajjar :
> Hi to all,
>
> Can someone tell me how juniper in wireless compare to Aruba and cisco.
> __
Hi to all,
Can someone tell me how juniper in wireless compare to Aruba and cisco.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
On 26/May/16 15:35, Colton Conor wrote:
> Alright, so if not upgrading from a previous Juniper box (buying new),
> would you at this point not take the newer RE's that are the same
> price as the older?
Well, if I'm deploying Juniper for the first time, I'll go with the
latest and greatest.
If
Alright, so if not upgrading from a previous Juniper box (buying new),
would you at this point not take the newer RE's that are the same price as
the older?
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 26/May/16 11:52, raf wrote:
>
> >
> > Ah ok. This RE come with a new embeded ne
On 26/May/16 11:52, raf wrote:
>
> Ah ok. This RE come with a new embeded network card for the mngt, and
> Freebsd 6 does have not support for it; and juniper would not make the
> effort to backport it.
> Juniper want their customer to test their new code. It can be scary
> for op, and understan
Le 25/05/2016 à 23:33, Phil Rosenthal a écrit :
There is a different network card driver, so it would require a different
kernel.
Ah ok. This RE come with a new embeded network card for the mngt, and
Freebsd 6 does have not support for it; and juniper would not make the
effort to backport
> Saku Ytti
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 3:34 PM
>
> On 25 May 2016 at 17:10, raf wrote:
>
> > Sure; but often network components are relatively isolated of the rest
> > of the DCs, so running all of them on a big hypervisor close to the
> > forwarding engine make sense (at least for me).
>
> A
> Phil Rosenthal
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 5:53 PM
>
>
> > On May 25, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Colton Conor
> wrote:
> >
> > Assuming we are not going to be using these new RE's to load any 3rd
> > party software on them, the RE-S-X6-64G-BB will just be a quicker
> > processor with more ram compar
14 matches
Mail list logo
