Hello experts,
I'm having a strange issue while trying to configure a l2circuit/xconnect
interop. between a MX-104 and a ME3600X.
One interesting thing is that both equipments (ME3600X and MX104) has
l2circuits/xconnects with another devices (other Junipers and Cisco
routers like the old 2951 and
I've deployed a number of SRX3xx devices, with good results.
Features I've used on that platform include OSPF, IPsec S2S VPN,
L2-transparent mode, clustering. Some of the devices are now in production
for 3+ months, running stable and no issues seen so far.
When migrating from SRX1xx/2xx, you migh
It just does.
> On 28 sept. 2016 at 18:49, Johan Borch wrote :
>
> I don't have a route-reflector, this is a full iBGP mesh, will family
> route-target still work?
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Dragan Jovicic wrote:
>
>> By default route-reflector will reflect/refresh all vpn routes to
Hi
I don't have a route-reflector, this is a full iBGP mesh, will family
route-target still work?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Dragan Jovicic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> By default route-reflector will reflect/refresh all vpn routes to a PE
> router, even if PE doesn't need those routes (doesn't imp
Hi,
By default route-reflector will reflect/refresh all vpn routes to a PE
router, even if PE doesn't need those routes (doesn't import target
community).
Route-target family allows PE to give route-reflector a permission to send
only those routes for which import target exists.
The fact that this
On 28 September 2016 at 17:05, Dan Peachey wrote:
> I may be missing something, but shouldn't the default behaviour be to
> drop all VPN routes that are not locally imported into a VRF? Unless
> you configure "keep all" or the PE is also configured as an RR.
Yes. But you'll still load them. If y
On 28 September 2016 at 14:47, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On 28 September 2016 at 16:38, Johan Borch wrote:
>
>> Will router-target-family work even if it is cisco in one end?
>
> Yes, IOS supports route-target SAFI.
>
> --
> ++ytti
Hi,
I may be missing something, but shouldn't the default behaviour
On 28 September 2016 at 16:38, Johan Borch wrote:
> Will router-target-family work even if it is cisco in one end?
Yes, IOS supports route-target SAFI.
--
++ytti
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailm
Will router-target-family work even if it is cisco in one end?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On 28 September 2016 at 14:18, Adam Vitkovsky
> wrote:
> > BGP has plethora of options with regards to route filtering and MP-BGP
> is no exception.
> > Easiest way is to just filt
On 28 September 2016 at 14:18, Adam Vitkovsky
wrote:
> BGP has plethora of options with regards to route filtering and MP-BGP is no
> exception.
> Easiest way is to just filter updates based on vrf-target and apply the
> policy on router1 as export on session to router2.
I'm with Ivan here, I b
> Johan Borch
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 11:02 AM
>
> Hi
>
> Lets say i have two PE-routers, router1 and router2.
>
> They run MP-BGP, MPLS and so on, the usual stuff. I have one VRF with a lot
> of routes in (DFZ). Router2 is not importing the vrf-target for this VRF.
> My problem is th
Hi,
This is a solution to your problem:
http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos15.1/topics/reference/configuration-statement/family-edit-protocols-bgp-route-target-vp.html
Give it a try first in a lab test first. If you use RR you should copy its
loopback address to inet.3 on all PEs.
Hi
Lets say i have two PE-routers, router1 and router2.
They run MP-BGP, MPLS and so on, the usual stuff. I have one VRF with a lot
of routes in (DFZ). Router2 is not importing the vrf-target for this VRF.
My problem is that router2 is dead slow and even if I'm not importing this
perticual vrf-ta
13 matches
Mail list logo
