> From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2018 12:15 PM
>
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 14:02, wrote:
>
> > Really? Interesting, didn't know that, are these features documented
> anywhere? I could not find anything looking for multi instance RPD.
> > Are the RPD instances
On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 14:02, wrote:
> Really? Interesting, didn't know that, are these features documented
> anywhere? I could not find anything looking for multi instance RPD.
> Are the RPD instances as ships in night, each maintaining its own set of
> tables and protocols?
Yes. It's old
> From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2018 11:44 AM
>
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 16:40, wrote:
>
> > Another alternative would be to spin up a separate BGP process, which I
> think is supported only in XR, but once again that somewhat places one on
> the outskirts
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 16:40, wrote:
> Another alternative would be to spin up a separate BGP process, which I think
> is supported only in XR, but once again that somewhat places one on the
> outskirts of the common deployment graph.
> But I know Mark is using csr1k -so depending on the
On 17/Aug/18 15:39, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
> Another alternative would be to spin up a separate BGP process, which I think
> is supported only in XR, but once again that somewhat places one on the
> outskirts of the common deployment graph.
> But I know Mark is using csr1k
5 matches
Mail list logo
