Hi all,
Thanks for supporting.
After the change of flow-table-size we now get to see flows on the GENIEATM
box.
result:
Received Flows/sec: 5126
Flow information
FPC Slot: 0
Flow Packets: 42833914564, Flow Bytes: 37364742189748
Active Flows: 235206, Total Flows: 1015377662
Flow
you're right, but that's what I meant.
Op wo 2 jan. 2019 om 11:29 schreef Dave Bell :
> i want samples of a every 128 packets
>>
>
> Netflow/Jflow/IPFIX does not sample packets. It samples flows. A flow is
> (could be?) made up of many packets.
>
>
_
is sets a sampling rate of 128:1. Is that intentional?
>
> Dave
>
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 10:08, A. Camci wrote:
>
>> Hi Steinar,
>>
>> see the config:
>>
>> set services flow-monitoring version-ipfix template ipv4 ipv4-template
>> set services flow-monit
Hi Steinar,
see the config:
set services flow-monitoring version-ipfix template ipv4 ipv4-template
set services flow-monitoring version-ipfix template ipv6 ipv6-template
set forwarding-options sampling instance inline input rate 128
set forwarding-options sampling instance inline family inet ou
Hi all,
Does anyone have experience with GENIEATM ( 6.3.2 ) and Juniper MX480 MPCE
Type 2 3D ( 16.1R4-S3.6).
recently we use the inline-jflow monitoring.
it works but we receive too little sampling.
expect a 10k of sampling per second instead of 100 samples
Border Router:
Flow information
F
May 2018 at 17:07, A. Camci wrote:
> > does anyone have an idea why it does not work on Acx( vrf+ vrrp).
> >
> > Br ap
>
> How have you tried to debug this set up?
>
> From your original em ail:"maybe vrf+vrrpdoesnt work on a ACX." - Have
> you confi
does anyone have an idea why it does not work on Acx( vrf+ vrrp).
Br ap
Op di 24 apr. 2018 om 10:20 schreef A. Camci
>
> Hi Guys,
>>
>> we are migration the Cisco CISCO7606-S to the acx5096.
>> But we have 1 customer with VRF and VRRP on the same port.
>>
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> we are migration the Cisco CISCO7606-S to the acx5096.
> But we have 1 customer with VRF and VRRP on the same port.
>
> after migration to the ACX has customer no connection from the VRF.
> if we switch back to cisco, everything works fine.
>
> this is a full redundant vrf.
> other
Hi Guys,
we are migration the Cisco CISCO7606-S to the acx5096.
But we have 1 customer with VRF and VRRP on the same port.
after migration to the ACX has customer no connection from the VRF.
if we switch back to cisco, everything works fine.
this is a full redundant vrf.
other side is still cis
9 matches
Mail list logo
