[j-nsp] Radius Accounting in Juniper Steel Belted Radius with Cisco IOS devices

Hi All, I am evaluating Juniper SBR as AAA server. Most of the devices in our network are Cisco. Completed Authentication and Authorization part of SBR but stuck in Accounting part. The requirement is to have GUI in SBR to view 'accounting' logs per device, but in SBR all the accounting logs are

[j-nsp] RPM support in MX-80 with MPC

Hi, Does MX-80 with Junos 11.2 which has only MPC FPC/PIC support Real Time Performance Monitor (RPM)? The document claims that MX should have Multiservices DPC should be present for RPM support? Please clarify. thanks in advance Arun ___ juniper-nsp ma

[j-nsp] Divert one specific VRF (L3 MPLS VPN) or L2 circuit over RSVP-TE

Hi, I am testing RSVP-TE in Juniper MX Junos 11.2R3. Is there a way to have a RSVP-TE between ingress and egress PE and use that RSVP-TE only for one specific L3 MPLS VPN or L2 Circuit VPN customer and other VPN customers between the same ingress and egress PE to prefer a IGP/LDP path? In case of

Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 circuit - Traffic not flowing between Cisco and Juniper with mismatched VLAN ID

I ve tried all of the recommended options provided but it did not work out, Option 1: encapsulation vlan-ccc; vlan-id 601 input-vlan-map pop; output-vlan-map push; Option 2: encap vlan-ccc; vlan-tags outer 601; output-vlan-map swap; family ccc; Option 3: encapsula

Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 circuit - Traffic not flowing between Cisco and Juniper with mismatched VLAN ID

i m trying to do VLAN mode. below is the previous config that I tried, nieg@LAB-MX-PE5# show interfaces ge-1/1/0.601 encapsulation vlan-ccc; vlan-id 601 input-vlan-map pop; output-vlan-map push; [edit] nieg@LAB-MX-PE5# show protocols l2circuit neighbor 10.20.0.2 { interface ge-1/1/0.601 {

Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 circuit - Traffic not flowing between Cisco and Juniper with mismatched VLAN ID

Hi Benny, Thanks for the reply. I tried the option of "input-vlan-map pop" and "output-vlan-map push" in MX previously. When I change the encapsulation type to "ethernet" under "edit protocols l2circuit" the Layer 2 circuit itself going down displaying EM "encapsulation mismatch". This did not wo

[j-nsp] Layer 2 circuit - Traffic not flowing between Cisco and Juniper with mismatched VLAN ID

Hi, I am testing Layer 2 circuit between Juniper MX-80 with Cisco platform. When the VLAN ID of both attachment circuit is matching, then traffic is flowing through emulated Layer 2 circuit. But when the VLAN ID is not matchingon both attachment circuit, then Layer 2 circuit remains up but the tra

[j-nsp] Juniper MX Firewall Filter (Policer) OID

*Hi All, I have a network setup where under the interface firewall filter for multiple customers (customers with unique term) been configured with each customer has a policer to their corresponding value. I would like to get Byte counter for every term (which corresponds to every customer) and map

[j-nsp] Interworking Layer 2 MPLS (Ethernet - Sonet) OSPF Adjacency issue

Hi, Setup is L2 MPLS interworking - one side is Ethernet and other side is Sonet (encapsulation hdlc). IP connectivity between both customer end routers is fine. Now I am trying to bring up OSPF adjacency between two CE and am facing issues. Since one side is Sonet (ospf network point to point) a

[j-nsp] Juniper MX supports other variants of j-Flow except IPFIX

Hi Juniper NSP, Would like to know whether Juniper MX series router support other variants of jflow except IP FIX. Flow collector that i m evaluating does not support IPFIX v10 (inline-jflow) which MX supports. So just wanted to check what other variants of jflow that can be supported. thanks Aru

Re: [j-nsp] IPFIX - "no template found" in wireshark of Flow Collector

Hi, After I decoded the packet capture as cflow only, i m seeing that output (no template found). Its there under Data section of Cisco NetFlow/IPFIX. On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Tima Maryin wrote: > Hi, > > Try Analyze -> Decode as then cflow > > > > On 23.0

[j-nsp] IPFIX - "no template found" in wireshark of Flow Collector

Hi NSP, I configured IPFIX in juniper MX running 11.2 R3. I run wireshark in flow collector where i m getting flows from the juniper router but all data are showing "no template found"? What is the problem in this? I had a problem on the same router where i was told to move to another PIC/port. I

Re: [j-nsp] IPFIX Egress Flow not working - MX80

Hi Andy, Thanks for your reply. I will try to move to another interface and check. thanks Arun On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Andrew Nusbaum < andrew.nusb...@mindspark.com> wrote: > > What would be the issue in the second router which is not exporting > > output > > flows? Any bugs discovered

[j-nsp] IPFIX Egress Flow not working - MX80

Hi NSP, I have got a couple of MX80 router running Junos 11.2 IPFIX (inline jflow) configured for both input and output flow sampling. One router is exporting both input and output flows correctly to flow collector but the other router is not exporting output flows only input flows. The configurat

[j-nsp] MX80 throughput with IPFIX 1:1 sampling ratio

Hi All, I would like to know if anyone have enabled IPFIX in MX80 router and observed the throughput of the router? I would like to know the effect of throughput when IPFIX with sampling rate 1:1 configured in MX80? thanks in advance Arun ___ juniper-ns

Re: [j-nsp] How to calculate "burst-size-limit" in JUNOS Firewall Policer

Hi, Thanks for your answers. thanks Arun On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Ogiboski, Robson (NSN - BR/Curitiba) < robson.ogibo...@nsn.com> wrote: > See JNCIA guide pag 456. > > Setting the burst-size-limit > The Juniper Networks Technical Assistance Center (JTAC) suggests setting > the burst-si

[j-nsp] How to calculate "burst-size-limit" in JUNOS Firewall Policer

Hi All, I am facing some issues in calculating the right burst size limit for Firewall policer in Junos. As per the document, the burst size limit is calculated like below: 1. The minimum value allowed is 1500 bytes. 2. The minimum value should be 10 times of interface MTU. 3. Burst size limit is