Re: [j-nsp] Route redistribution

2012-05-23 Thread Cyn D.
- Original Message - From: "Jonathan Lassoff" To: "Cyn D." Cc: Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:12 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Route redistribution On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Cyn D. wrote: Thanks for the input. Given our network topology, I am trying to avoid running

Re: [j-nsp] Route redistribution

2012-05-22 Thread Cyn D.
Thanks for the input. Given our network topology, I am trying to avoid running a full IBGP mesh. Also forgot to mention, OSPF Area 5 is a NSSA so that I will have control over what is being advertised. - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Lassoff" To: "Cyn D."

[j-nsp] Route redistribution

2012-05-22 Thread Cyn D.
Network connections: We have router A(M120, 10.4), B(MX240, 11.4) and C(M7i, 10.4) connected as a triangle. Router A and B are in OSPF area 0 and also run IBGP between them. Router C is connected to A and B via OSPF area 5. Problem: Router A has a lot of EBGP learned routes. These routes are

[j-nsp] Coloured GBIC

2011-07-20 Thread Cyn D.
Hi list, We need to run CWDM between a M7i router and a SSG 550 firewall. But we've learned Juniper doesn't officially support coloured GBIC. Anyone had experience running a third party coloured GBIC on these devices? Any issues? Thanks in advance. Cindy ___

Re: [j-nsp] Copy files to RE

2011-05-17 Thread Cyn D.
Thanks for all replied. It is a M120 with 9.5R1.8. It took about half hour to copy a jinstall file between two REs. - Original Message - From: "Phil Shafer" To: "Cyn D." Cc: Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 3:51 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Copy files to RE "Cyn D.

[j-nsp] Copy files to RE

2011-05-17 Thread Cyn D.
I tried to copy(ftp) jinstall file to backup RE but for some reason the Mgmt port on backup RE is not responsive. Then tried to copy the file from master RE to backup RE but it takes for ever - more than half hour still not complete. Just wondering what is the best way to copy the big file in th

Re: [j-nsp] Code upgrade to 10.4R4.5

2011-05-11 Thread Cyn D.
he incompatible config for you? If it doesn't, even if you have a backup config, it still won't load properly, right? We've seen this on some non-juniper routers. Thanks. Cindy - Original Message - From: "Richard A Steenbergen" To: "Cyn D." Cc: "J

Re: [j-nsp] Code upgrade to 10.4R4.5

2011-05-11 Thread Cyn D.
ge - From: "Justin M. Streiner" To: "Jared Mauch" Cc: "Cyn D." ; Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 2:43 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Code upgrade to 10.4R4.5 On Wed, 11 May 2011, Jared Mauch wrote: I'm sure someone from Juniper will say that going forward like

[j-nsp] Code upgrade to 10.4R4.5

2011-05-11 Thread Cyn D.
Hi list, Tried to upgrade a M7i from 9.5R1.8 to 10.4R4.5, but validation failed: Using jbase-10.4R4.5.tgz [: /var/validate/chroot/tmp/jbase/packages/jbase-10.4R4.5: unexpected operator Verified manifest signed by PackageProduction_10_4_0 Using /var/validate/chroot/tmp/jbundle/jboot-10.4R4.5.tgz

[j-nsp] How many ways to connect

2011-03-16 Thread Cyn D.
We are considering having dual connections to TWO ISPs on ONE router (M120), what's the best way to connect? - receive full routing table from both ISPs; - receive customer routes and default from each ISP, make one default more preferable than the other; - others options? In option two, if ther

Re: [j-nsp] M7i compact flash card

2009-08-20 Thread Cyn D.
, while you can buy the exact same for under $100! We didn't bother to ask for the CF. I assume it will be the similar deal. This will only cause us and JTAC more grief. C. - Original Message - From: "Cyn D." To: Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 10:11 AM Subject: [j-nsp] M7

[j-nsp] M7i compact flash card

2009-08-20 Thread Cyn D.
Hi list, We are looking at adding a compact flash on our M7i boxes. If we don't order it from Juniper, could someone tell me which manufacture Juniper uses for CF? What's the R/W speed of the card or does it even matter? Any specification of the card is appreciated. Thanks. C.

Re: [j-nsp] juniper mpls mtu

2008-12-02 Thread Cyn D.
Juniper default physical layer MTU 1514, family inet (IP) MTU 1500, family MPLS 1488 (=1514-14-3X4) counted most tags possible (3). To pass big IP packet (1460+20+20), make MPLS MTU 1500, therefore interface physical MTU is set to 1500+3x4+14=1526. this also makes family inet mtu=1526-14=1512.