Re: [j-nsp] lsp required for vpls?

Simon, I am not a Junos expert, but in general since you enabled link ldp between the PE routers and also a targteted ldp between PE's , you should be okay. did on quiet get what you meant by "without MPLS-LSP" ??? because you already have mpls lsp by enabling link ldp. rega

[j-nsp] 802.1ag in junper M320

; } } is there any working config for this ? regards Dinesh ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] static route for multicast RPF lookup

Thanks all, let me try this. On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Dinesh wrote: > Does Juniper have a command to configure a static route for multicast RPF > lookup ??? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.neth

[j-nsp] static route for multicast RPF lookup

Does Juniper have a command to configure a static route for multicast RPF lookup ??? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] l2-circuit from Juniper m40 to a cisco

9 --> interface not present" error. > It says "interface does not exist" ... > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Dinesh wrote: > >> just attaching the interface config.. >> >> fe-5/2/2 { >>vlan-tagging; >>

Re: [j-nsp] l2-circuit from Juniper m40 to a cisco

, Dinesh wrote: > Hi i am trying to bring up a l2-circuit from Juniper m40 to a cisco... i > see cisco fine... but i get this error on m40 ... > > > neighbor 2.2.2.2 { > interface fe-5/2/2.600 { > virtual-circuit-id 999; > } > } > > 10 16:52:06.8

[j-nsp] l2-circuit from Juniper m40 to a cisco

Hi i am trying to bring up a l2-circuit from Juniper m40 to a cisco... i see cisco fine... but i get this error on m40 ... neighbor 2.2.2.2 { interface fe-5/2/2.600 { virtual-circuit-id 999; } } 10 16:52:06.831491 [l2ckt_intf_change_process] Change processing for intf fe-5/2/2.

[j-nsp] second try on cisco cpe 850 adsl dhcp config

Hi Friends, (excuse me for sending this to juniper as well as alcatel list..) I am taking a second chance to get help on this. I am trying to configure my cisco 850 cpe via adsl as a dhcp client to obtain address from the bras router. What i see is , the DHCPDISCOVER from cpe reaches the bras, and

Re: [j-nsp] Use of P router

No. Just 2 PE's are sufficient On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Abhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi every body > > Had a query currently trying to set up a lab for customer to demonstrate > various services which can be provided over MPLS environment. > > I have a question in a MPLS topology is

Re: [j-nsp] l3 vpn ping in juniper in M320

gt; > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dinesh Bhonsle > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:56 AM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] l3 vpn ping in juniper in M320 > > Hi, > > I

[j-nsp] l3 vpn ping in juniper in M320

M320 does not reply , but mistreiously forwards icmp echo requests to CE2. When i ping from CE1 to 81.1.1.2 , i see ping responses from CE2, ping successful. So only ping to junipers ip-addr fails. Regards Dinesh ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Vccv ping on l2vpns on JuniperM320 [ second try]

Second try . -Original Message- From: Dinesh Bhonsle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:22 PM To: 'juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net' Subject: Vccv ping on l2vpns on JuniperM320 Hi, I have a l2vpn circuit between Juniper M320 and Alcatel 7750 box. B

[j-nsp] Vccv ping on l2vpns on JuniperM320

/0/1.700 { virtual-circuit-id 301; control-word; } } } I am I missing any config ? Regards Dinesh ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman