As you can see below. The first clear arp hostname I do, it immediately
re-requests the arp.
It's like a reset. If the request fails or if I issue the clear arp hostname
command a
second time, the arp entry is deleted. The router will not issue any more arps
unless I
delete and readd the
I agree, as long as the transport between devices supports the MTU. This
is especially important with device interoperability. Cisco, for
example, apparently pads out ISO hello packets to MTU (Juniper limits it
to maximum ISO packet size). If the packet is discarded by transport
medium, the
On 2/17/2012 10:27 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
Thanks..
We're also ok with going to an 11.x release if there's a such thing as a
golden release in the 11.x code...;)
I had to jump to 11.2 for static units with auto-configure on the same
interface on an MX80 for subscriber services. Running
On 11/11/2011 11:42 AM, Mike Williams wrote:
So. VPLS. Point-to-multiple-point. Virtual LAN. Brilliant!
I haven't yet found any documentation that I can actually understand though.
Note: The site range value must be greater than the largest site identifier.
is especially confusing. Range is
More importantly, if it was the issue dated in August, how in the heck
do I get on a list which tells me such a critical bug exists?
Jack
On 11/7/2011 2:03 PM, Krembs, Jesse wrote:
Has anyone else seen this issue?
'Juniper BGP issues causing locallized Internet Problems, (Mon, Nov
On 11/7/2011 8:28 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jack Batesjba...@brightok.net said:
More importantly, if it was the issue dated in August, how in the heck
do I get on a list which tells me such a critical bug exists?
If you have a Juniper support account, go to
On 11/3/2011 1:45 PM, Terry Jones wrote:
Simple enough using a vlan-ccc. The problem is that I have to setup the
vlan-ccc over a GRE tunnel. Now the question I have is how to make it layer
2 to the GE interface? Since I can using a vlan-ccc, vlan-ccc and family
inet cannot be configured on the
On 11/3/2011 2:28 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
On 11/3/2011 1:45 PM, Terry Jones wrote:
Simple enough using a vlan-ccc. The problem is that I have to setup the
vlan-ccc over a GRE tunnel. Now the question I have is how to make it
layer
2 to the GE interface? Since I can using a vlan-ccc, vlan-ccc
On 11/1/2011 6:39 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On the MX series routers, the only netflow you can do with DPCs is
heavily sampled, exported by the RE, and limited to Netflow v5?
Without an ms-dpc, that is correct.
If you have DPCs, you can buy an MS-DPC to do real netflow. Based on
the software
On 10/26/2011 1:07 AM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
As described to Shane semantically this is identical in default
behaviour as installing all prefixes into RIB and FIB. However I would
argue that if you do it within the POP you can do much better savings
that the default behavior. But this is
On 10/26/2011 11:45 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
I'm the first person that will preach against MPLS for all
the useless buzz it gets, but even I think that it has a
use-case here, if it's not a bother to the operator.
Yeah, I'm really happy that LFA should work 100% in my network topology,
leaving
11 matches
Mail list logo
