Re: [j-nsp] EX4550 and MX104

We encountered this on T1600 chassis. After months troubleshooting, i discovered myself it is due to some monitoring system were still polling using snmp v1. After all changed to v2c. Problem resolved. As usual JTAC would suspect here and there, and luckyly i have another chassis with identical

Re: [j-nsp] Questions about T640

resend I'm sorry, For T640, How about this announcement ? https://gallery.mailchimp.com/1466897c24c515e6739f14c9e/files/TSB16819.pdf On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Alireza Soltanian wrote: > No T640 and T4000 are still manufactured. Anyway is there anybody who can >

[j-nsp] SSG Dialup VPN stability problems

similar problems in the past and what did they do to resolve them? I have been unable to identify any single problem as every time I connect I am able to stay online for days without being disconnected?. Any feedback would be really appreciated. Regards, Jimmy Stwepot

[j-nsp] SSG 140 WebVPN

on the standard external Public IP? Regards, Jimmy Stewpot. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] Windows XP L2TP/IPSEC vpn without certificates

which tells me how to configure L2TP without certificates specifically I would love to be able to use Radius/user password authentication for the vpn. Regards, Jimmy Stewpot. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https

[j-nsp] SSG 140 Software

Hi All, I am interested to know if anyone can provide me with what the latest version of software is for the SSG140? Regards, Jimmy. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] Diagnosing Policy Discards

additional feedback would be much appreciated. Regards, Jimmy Stewpot. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] Layer 3 VPN Routing and Forwarding (VRF) Tables Issue

that are learned via direct peering under CT vrf. Those routes are not advertised to router B premium vrf. Any clue? Cheers, Jimmy ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Layer 3 VPN Routing and Forwarding (VRF) Tables Issue

== Cheers, Jimmy -Original Message- From: Nalkhande Tarique Abbas [mailto:ntari...@juniper.net] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 4:55 PM To: Jimmy Halim; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Layer 3 VPN Routing and Forwarding (VRF) Tables Issue You said --I

Re: [j-nsp] Layer 3 VPN Routing and Forwarding (VRF) Tables Issue

advertised out to other PEs under CT vrf table or premium vrf table. Thanks Regards, Jimmy -Original Message- From: Nalkhande Tarique Abbas [mailto:ntari...@juniper.net] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 6:11 PM To: Jimmy Halim; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Layer 3 VPN

[j-nsp] CoS clarification on MPLS interface

Which policy will took place, if you apply a CoS DSCP/EXP classification and DSCP/EXP rewrite policy on an MPLS switching interface (keeping in mind packet is being switched using MPLS shim header), I know MPLS EXP classification and rewriting will defiantly be used but what about DSCP

Re: [j-nsp] CoS clarification on MPLS interface

would you expect from a Juniper J-Series or M-Series router. Will it use DSCP classification or not? Will it rewrite DSCP value or not? Regards, Andrew -Original Message- From: Fahad Ali Khan [mailto:faha...@cyber.net.pk] Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 9:03 PM To: Andrew Jimmy Subject: Re

Re: [j-nsp] Rate limit ARP per interface (or JUNOS bug)?

This policer thing seems fine. Can you please write what to police under arp FOO firewall. It would be great if you can write the complete firewall. Regards, AW -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Pekka

[j-nsp] bursit size for OC-192

Calculating burst size for low interfaces is very simple which is ten times the interface's MTU. For a high-speed interface, such as an OC-192, the recommended burst size is the transmit rate of the interface times 3-5 milliseconds (AS per JNCIE book). Can someone write a real-time and practical

Re: [j-nsp] forwarding class nd loss priority

: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:26 AM To: Andrew Jimmy Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] forwarding class nd loss priority Hello, schedulers and schedulers-map is to schdule traffic egress. The scheduler decides how much bandwidth a forwarding class gets. Ingress forwarding class

[j-nsp] snmp-trap community

You can set the snmp community in JUNOS using.. 'set snmp community public authorization read-only'.. But it's for pooling OK You know when you configure snmp traps you define a community for trap manager..I have configure my trap settings like show be low. Set trap-group auth-traps targets

Re: [j-nsp] snmp-trap community

Thanks for the reply. So WEBKOM is community the one you send along with traps to snmp manager for authentication. Correct! -Original Message- From: Patrik Olsson [mailto:d...@webkom.se] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 11:45 AM To: Andrew Jimmy Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re

[j-nsp] forwarding class nd loss priority

Forwarding class and loss priority is some of the confusing stuff in JUNOS world. Can someone write about loss priority/scheduler maps in detail along with a example. Like what if you are running MPLS VPN and you want to keep priorities voice traffic (if you want to avoid jitter for the sip call)

[j-nsp] display mpls table

When you run the following command, why you can't see the 679 active routes. junos show route protocol mpls table mpls.0 mpls.0: 679 destinations, 679 routes (679 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both 0 *[MPLS/0] 4w5d

Re: [j-nsp] display mpls table

Yup, this is an ingress PE -Original Message- From: Nilesh Khambal [mailto:nkham...@juniper.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 9:30 PM To: Andrew Jimmy Cc: 'Stefan Fouant'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] display mpls table Is this an ingress PE? Nilesh Andrew

[j-nsp] PIM join Upstream Unknown

When will you get Upstream interface: uknown? PIM-dense-sparse mode has already been enabled on all interfaces. All the IPs are accessible from each router and end clients. There is no connectivity or route reach-ability issues between routers or multicast source/receiver. Multicast source

Re: [j-nsp] j series query not answered on the KB

Hi do you have any real time example for Junos scripting. Run ping checks and change static route based on result. If yea, can you please share the code and the way it works. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On

[j-nsp] FEB/FPC Complexity

I come to know that M120 can provide N:1 FEB redundancy. As per juniper DOCS, A FEB redundancy group is a named collection of two or more Forwarding Engine Boards (FEBs) that can improve interface availability. You can design your redundant FEB configuration to provide backup on a one-to-one

Re: [j-nsp] FEB/FPC Complexity

) [mailto:raymondh@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 9:17 PM To: Andrew Jimmy Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] FEB/FPC Complexity A maximum of two Type 1 FPCs and one Type 2 or Type 3 compact FPC can be mapped per FEB. Do the math. Each FEB can hold up to 20G

Re: [j-nsp] LDP FEC Default Behavior

What if you want to configure JUNOS to advertise MPLS labels for all Static, Connected and IGP routes. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:52 PM To:

[j-nsp] ispf support on Juniper routers

Does Juniper router support ispf feature so that router only recalculate a portion of the Shortest Path Tree when receive local link state advertisements Cisco router ospf 1 ispf ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] IOS to JUNOS QoS

Thanks for your reply. Can you let me know the way to use 8 supported Queues instead of 4 usable queues. CoS queues : 8 supported, 4 maximum usable queues -Original Message- From: Patrik Olsson [mailto:d...@webkom.se] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 3:16 PM To: Andrew Jimmy Cc

Re: [j-nsp] IOS to JUNOS QoS

[mailto:s...@clarke-3.demon.nl] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 10:49 PM To: Andrew Jimmy Cc: 'Patrik Olsson'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] IOS to JUNOS QoS You have to enable it ... by default the PIC only has 4 queues available. i.e. set chassis fpc 1 pic 0 max-queues-per

[j-nsp] Juniper SONET OC48/192

I'm just looking information about juniper 'PC-1OC192-SON-XFP, XFP-10G-L-OC192-SR1'. For this we need to have SDH or we can directly terminate into DWDM network. What will be the coloring scheme? How do you consider dB losses when interconnecting router optical interface to SDH which contains two

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper SONET OC48/192

or not. It would be nice if you can describe this. Once again thanks for your quick response. -Original Message- From: Patrik Olsson [mailto:pols...@juniper.net] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 6:38 PM To: Andrew Jimmy Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Juniper SONET OC48/192 Hello! I'm just

[j-nsp] IOS to JUNOS QoS

What is the equivalent to this in JUNOS, keeping in mind that I'm not pasting classes intentionally. Policy-map test-policy Class FTP Bandwidth percent 10 Class HTTP Bandwidth percent 20 ! Interface Serial 0/0/0 Bandwidth 1536 service-policy output test-policy

[j-nsp] mpls l3vpn

Why you get * on destination PE and one extra hop when you do traceroute. juni...@re traceroute 192.1.1.5 routing-instance l3vpn traceroute to 192.1.1.5 (192.1.1.5), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 1.1.0.1 (1.1.0.1) 157.301 ms 207.940 ms 157.392 ms MPLS Label=299840 CoS=0

[j-nsp] Control Plane Protection

You are concerned about DoS attacks against a key perimeter router in your company. Configure router so that it limits the aggregate rate of ARP traffic toward the route processor to 75 packets per second. Routing control traffic marked with an IP Precedence value of 6 should be limited to 100

[j-nsp] RSVP LSP Bandwidth

What does meant by reserved and highwater bandwidth reservation exactly. Is this something similar to police rate-limit or traffic shaping? Why do you need to reserve bandwidth and in what circumstances ; what are the impacts? I will appreciate if someone can explain all of this in very simple

[j-nsp] l2circuit OL

encapsulation vlan-ccc; fastether-options { loopback; } unit 101 { encapsulation vlan-ccc; vlan-id 512; family ccc; } neighbor 10.1.1.3 { interface fe-0/0/2.101 { virtual-circuit-id 512; } } Neighbor: 10.1.1.3 Interface

[j-nsp] VRF router reflector support

BGP route reflection is not supported for VPN routing and forwarding (VRF) routing instances. Is there any hope we will get route-reflection for VRF (L3VPNs or VPLS)? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit or l2vpn

between l2vpn and VPLS. Can't you have pseudo-wire circuit on traditional IP network ( just like cisco L2TPVv3). From: keegan.hol...@sungard.com [mailto:keegan.hol...@sungard.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:08 PM To: Andrew Jimmy Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; juniper

[j-nsp] Queue PQ CQ WFQ CBWFQ

Does Juniper boxes and JUNOS support queue mechanism of PQ CQ WFQ or CBWFQ. If yes; Is there any hardware limitations? Can anyone guide me to the right Document? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS support on Fast Ethernet

Thanks for the update on this. How about running MPLS label switching (P) on E3 IQ PICS and using PB-4FE-TX/PE-4FE-TX as PE customer edge. The question is what MPLS applications (VPLS, L3VPN RFC 2527bis, Multicast over MPLS L3VPN/VPLS are supported in such infrastructure. -Original

[j-nsp] VPLS support on Fast Ethernet

Does VPLS supported on Juniper Fast Ethernet PB-4FE-TX/PE-4FE-TX? If above Fast-Ethernet doest support VPLS; Can someone recommend any of Fast-Ethernet module which support VPLS. What's the difference between PB or PE cards? ___

Re: [j-nsp] JR Global static route configuration

Two minor points you can have multiple static routes for the same destination address with the same preference (juniper) admin distance (Cisco) and difference interfaces for load balancing. The exception is the default gateway 0.0.0.0 which can only occur once per admin distance but you can use

[j-nsp] 4:1 oversubscription

Can someone please explain what does mean by 4:1 or 2:1 oversubscription? A 4-port Gigabit Ethernet PIC supporting up to 4:1 oversubscription A 8-port Gigabit Ethernet PIC supporting up to 2:1 oversubscription ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] 4:1 oversubscription

To: Andrew Jimmy; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [j-nsp] 4:1 oversubscription It means you can assign bandwidths to individual units where the sum of the assigned bandwidths are two (or four) times the bandwidth of the physical interface. Paul Goyette Juniper Networks Customer Service JTAC

[j-nsp] junos policy

How do you guys do else in JUNOS policy.. like what if I want 116.203.0/16 orlonger damping high and rest normal. How you are going to use it. Damping: high Damping: normal policy-statement damp { term 1 { from { route-filter 116.203.0.0/16 orlonger

Re: [j-nsp] VRRP trap

snmp { trap-group vrrp { categories { vrrp-events; } targets { 1.1.1.1; } } } You can change snmp trap target as well as trap events verion. ? mark is always your friend ...:) HTH Regards, Masood -Original Message-

[j-nsp] ospf import policy

To keep consistency of ospf database; we don't use import policy. If we don't need import policy for ospf protocol why the heck juniper developers are giving us an option to configure it. Can someone please write the usage of import policy for OSPF protocol. top set protocols ospf import

Re: [j-nsp] routing optimal path or suboptimal path

It would be nice if you can explain the following questions.. -Original Message- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2008 7:13 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Andrew Jimmy Subject: Re: [j-nsp] routing optimal path or suboptimal path On Saturday

[j-nsp] aggregate and generated routes

What is the practical usage of aggregate and generated routes. Aggregate routes does make sense to me but what is the usage of generated routes in network. Can someone please explain with example and conf. Thanks in advance.. ___ juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] alias command in JUNOS

What is the equivalent to Cisco alias command like alias exec sr show running-config in JUNOS. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] bgp-l3vpn table is confusing

While executing command below; I'm getting confuse with this prefix 2.2.2.2:3:192.168.6.0/24 Can someone please explain what the hell is :3: between 2.2.2.2 and 192.168.6.0. [EMAIL PROTECTED] run show route receive-protocol bgp 2.2.2.2 inet.0: 2233 destinations,