Re: [j-nsp] RIB - FIB filtering.

Hi, I think no one made an argument for not doing it that way.. I will deploy the RIB-FIB filtering tomorrow morning during our maintenance window, i hope everything goes well. Thank you all for your input. Kind regards, Peter Krüpl ___ juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] RIB - FIB filtering.

Dear group, I need to advertise host specific routes for black-holing to our upstream carriers. But it don't necessarily want to black-hole the same destinations within our own network. So in order to get our router to advertise, it must think that the route is active. So i inject a valid

Re: [j-nsp] RIB - FIB filtering.

performs every role. ,Peter From: Morgan McLean Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 4:32 PM To: Peter Krupl Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] RIB - FIB filtering. Can you establish a separate bgp neighbor and use a different routing instance

Re: [j-nsp] BOOTP helper on MX vrf

Hi, I have the following configuration working on an MX240 running 12.2R3.5. CUT set routing-instances 1023 forwarding-options dhcp-relay server-group SRV 10.1.1.33 set routing-instances 1023

[j-nsp] MPC(MX80) + DPCE-R firewall filter cpacity

Hi Group, I have googled and checked the KB for som time, but I'm unable to find anything usable... The question is: Is it safe to apply a firewall filter on an interface with 1700 from source-address x.x.x.x/y criteria ? Could I do it on several interfaces, what about interface speciffic

[j-nsp] IPFix export behavoiur on MX80

template ipv4 set instance sample-1 family inet output inline-jflow source-address 10.20.126.200 Kind Regards, Peter Krupl ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] ERX, and placing DHCP subscribers into VRF with Radius

Hi List, I have been searching for a solution on how to use radius to place dhcp subscribers into a vrf on an ERX. I have found small threads here and there, but none with a complete solution. Is anyone on the list actually doing this ? Kind Regards, Peter Krupl

[j-nsp] jnxBgpM2PeerRoutingInstance, which vrf it is pointing to.

Hi, On an MX running 10.4 the snmp agent supports the OID: jnxBgpM2PeerRoutingInstance. After days of research it still can't figure out how to figure out which VRF each bgp peering belongs to. Can anyone shed some light on this ? Kind regards, Peter Krüpl

[j-nsp] Arp entries not showing on IRB interfaces.

Hi, I could not find anything obvious in the KB. But it seems like IRB interfaces arp entries cannot be displayed. This applies to MX80 10.4R3.4, and MX240(DPC) 10.2R1.8. This applies to both set bridge-domains b101 routing-interface irb.96 and set routing-instances e101 instance-type vpls

Re: [j-nsp] Arp entries not showing on IRB interfaces.

Hi, I just figured it out The arp entry is created for the LSI interface or the local ports participating in a bridging or vpls instance. And not the BVI interface. Quite counter intuitive in my opinion. Kind regards, Peter Krupl -Original Message- From: Hentati, Akram

Re: [j-nsp] BGP multihop problem - ERX310

. Explicitly setting the source of your ping would help. Kind regards, Peter Krupl -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart Sent: 03. May, 2011 01:19 To: 'juniper-nsp List' Subject: [j-nsp] BGP

Re: [j-nsp] vrf-export practical proposals welcome....

-Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Stefan Fouant [mailto:sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net] Sendt: 30. april 2011 17:48 Til: Peter Krupl; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Emne: RE: [j-nsp] vrf-export practical proposals welcome -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun

Re: [j-nsp] vrf-export practical proposals welcome....

be matched in a chained Policy. Please disregard my previous post, my finger slipped while moving the mouse over the send button. Kind Regards, Peter Krüpl -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Stefan Fouant [mailto:sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net] Sendt: 30. april 2011 17:48 Til: Peter Krupl

[j-nsp] vrf-export practical proposals welcome....

Hi Group, I trying to think of a practical solution for communities to be applied to VRF routes. We have a mpls network consisting of several MX'es as PE routers. The PE routers have BGP PE-CE perrings and off course PE-PE peerings. Our advertising of routes to external peers is controlled by

Re: [j-nsp] msdpc example configs...

sampling IPv4 from a single vrf. Kind regards, Peter Krupl Siminn Danmark A/S -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of OBrien, Will Sent: 26. April, 2011 20:34 To: J NSP Subject: [j-nsp] msdpc example

[j-nsp] BGP path selection criteria per vrf ?

Hi Group, I was just wondering if the path selection criteria really can be different between vrf's on the same router. The doccumentation does state that each routing instance can have it's own bgp path selection configuration. But is this also true if the routing instance is a vrf ? Kind

Re: [j-nsp] Cisco 7206 replacement

Mark, perfect explanation. I recently ran into a limitaion in that I wanted to do traffic shaping on a M series, come to find that you must have queuing pics to do it. I ended up going with an asr as it does it with built in hardware. The M box was 60k more msrp... I needed 4 boxes, do

[j-nsp] Ex4200 interface-switch

to be Ok. But the connection is not forwarding any traffic. So is this a bug in 10.2R1.8 10.3R1.9 (the ones I have tested ) ? Or worse... is this unsupported ? Kind Regards, Peter Krupl ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https

[j-nsp] Filtering of routes from VRF to other PE's

Hi, We are running a mixed MPLS network consisting both of cisco and juniper routers. Im missing the default-information originate knob for BGP peers in Junos. It seems the solution is to install a static default route, and advertise that to the CE's. But i do not want the default route to

Re: [j-nsp] Filtering of routes from VRF to other PE's

I * 10.0.0.2/32D 0 lo0.666 Kind Regards, Peter Krupl -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Krupl Sent: 24. November, 2010 12:19 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] 1000BASE-T SFP sets interface status up once inserted into EX4200-24F

n/a 23GIGE 1000Tn/a Methode Elec. SP7041-M1-JN n/a Kind Regards, Peter Krupl Siminn Danmark A/S -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Martin T Sent: 05

[j-nsp] Ex4200 no native vlan, without fam. eth-switching. ?

Hi Group, Can I realy be true that it is not possible to have both vlan tagged and untagged subinterfaces son the same physical interface on the EX4200 without using fam. eth-switching ? I have the following configuration: set interfaces ge-0/0/10 vlan-tagging set interfaces ge-0/0/10 unit 10

Re: [j-nsp] Ex4200 no native vlan, without fam. eth-switching. ?

To: Peter Krupl Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Ex4200 no native vlan, without fam. eth-switching. ? There's a switch to make it the native VLAN, but I believe you should not be using the vlan-tagging' configuration method with ex series switches per Juniper 'best

Re: [j-nsp] Ex4200 no native vlan, without fam. eth-switching. ?

Hi, Yes we are running CCC's on the EX4200's. ,Peter -Original Message- From: Michael Damkot Sent: 23. September, 2010 13:56 To: Peter Krupl Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Ex4200 no native vlan, without fam. eth-switching. ? You're running CCC on the ex

Re: [j-nsp] MS-DPC and netflow.

-template; } template mpls-ipv4 { mpls-ipv4-template; } } } . } ---CONFIG--- Kind Regards, Peter Krupl -Original Message- From: Chris Tracy

[j-nsp] MS-DPC and netflow.

9990; version9 { template { ip-template; } } } interface sp-1/0/0 { source-address 1.1.1.1; } } } } Kind regards, Peter Krupl

Re: [j-nsp] GRE Bridging, is it possible with a Juniper box ?

looking into L2TP as an alternative. But the One-Access 1221 1424 are supporting ethernet over GRE. Kind Regards, Peter Krupl -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Derick Winkworth Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 to IPv4 NAT on the MS-DPC

, as a virtual firewall device is not a feasible solution. Med venlig hilsen Peter Krupl Netværksspecialist Teknik Kundeservice +45 7026 2300 Fax +45 7026 2301 Siminn Danmark A/S Stationsparken 25 . 2600 Glostrup . Danmark . siminn.dk -Original Message- From: Chris Grundemann [mailto:cgrundem

[j-nsp] GRE Bridging, is it possible with a Juniper box ?

Hi, I have looked through the Juniper doc's for GRE with bridging. But it doesn't seem to exist at all. Is is possible ? Can I do it on a MX/MS-DPC or another Juniper box ? Med venlig hilsen Peter Krupl Netværksspecialist Teknik Direkte +45 3525 4752 Mobil  Kundeservice +45 7026 2300 Fax +45

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 questions

the restriction is that the EX only can manipulate the MPLS top label. We skipped the virtual chassis stuff for now, but we might consider to use it in the future. This device is a cisco killer, when it comes to access aggregation. I love it. Med venlig hilsen Peter Krupl Netværksspecialist Teknik

[j-nsp] ERX-310 ip-forwarding load errors

Hi Group, We have had some strange incidents, where certain routes I the ERX just don't seem to work. Although they are displayed correctly with si ip route. I noticed some load errors as shown below, but I don't have a clue what they are about. (probably something bad...).