Re: [j-nsp] Sandisk Extreme III 1G CF card compatibility

and crappy hosts. The ironic thing is that I think the CONTROLLER on the old Juniper RE's supports UDMA, but there aren't traces for it on the CF adapter. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper EX

. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper

Re: [j-nsp] About RE memory utilization

system running JUNOS 8.5 is today. :) On the other hand, if you exceed your FEB DRAM you are 101% screwed. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC

[j-nsp] Juniper announces new KillerPIC product

SUNNYVALE, Calif., April 1, 2008 -- Juniper Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: JNPR), the leader in high-performance networking, today announced a partnership with KillerNIC, a leading supplier of optimized gaming NICs. Under the arrangement announced today, KillerNIC will license its technology and

Re: [j-nsp] /31 subnet mask

Very Bad Things (tm) the day you plug them into your nice /31 using Juniper network and start routing packets to them. The biggest should know better but doesn't offender is probably Foundry, though I'm sure there are others. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e

Re: [j-nsp] M10 FEB heap usage (RPF/route options)

, but this one definitely does. If you must keep your old M5/M10s alive, this is infinitely better than trying to diddle with the software to squeeze another few routes in. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C

[j-nsp] packet kitty

http://mine.icanhascheezburger.com/View.aspx?ciid=781473 -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] MX vs. M

with complete and detailed alarms. One thing I forgot to mention, the only feature that should be there but isn't is RE-based RPM support. Everything else is fully implemented as of current code, including GRES, ISSU (well it works as well as on an M-series at any rate), OAM, etc. -- Richard

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS Bug list?

descriptions seem to be set only by the first level JTAC person who actually opens the case, thus you are all but guaranteed that the description will be completely wrong (and often illegible), no matter how many people who know whats actually going on have touched the PR afterwards. -- Richard

Re: [j-nsp] The Switch is ON !!!

not be using XFP here. I would encourage anyone who is interested in this product and who might ever want to use long-reach optics in it to talk to their account team about XFP instead of SFP+ blades NOW before this horribly bad idea progresses any further. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [j-nsp] The Switch is ON !!!

, and perhaps supported a few more routes, it would sell like hotcakes. /product review -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper

Re: [j-nsp] SFP Compatibility

of a part number in show chassis hardware, like so: Xcvr 0NON-JNPR K6S00Y5 XFP-10G-LR -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC

Re: [j-nsp] SFP Compatibility

, don't expect hardware vendors to let it go lightly. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Upgrading from 7.1 to ?

. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper

Re: [j-nsp] Upgrade without PCMCIA card?

to be dead to you just based on CPU speed and the 768MB hard memory limitation, but the people out there who are running relatively simple configurations on M5-M20s should still be able to keep them alive a couple more years. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras

Re: [j-nsp] m320

being centralized like the Internet Processor ASICs. Each PFE has an R-Chip, which on the T320/M320 means one per FPC. On T640 the FPC3 has 2x (each one is capable of doing 20Gbps), everything else is built with one. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras

Re: [j-nsp] Upgrade without PCMCIA card?

upgraded to 8.x last week you'll probably end up blowing out with FEB DRAM as soon as you do anyways. You could of course also upgrade this (also unsupported :P), but if any of this is confusing the correct answer is to downgrade code or upgrade platform. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL

Re: [j-nsp] RES: Juniper Junos 8.4

On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:16:06AM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: This is not true, MD5 has no relation. The issue is with an invalid BGP message which Cisco propagates harmlessly (a violation of the BGP spec, allowing the message to spread), but which Juniper (correctly) detects

Re: [j-nsp] 8.2R2.4 - 8.4R2.4 route installation delay

of routes. I've seen it block on installation of anything from a full table after a major policy change, reboot, RE swap, etc, to 50 routes blocking for 10 minutes after clearing a small bgp session on an otherwise unloaded router. I've even seen it happen when I added a static route. :) -- Richard

Re: [j-nsp] RES: Juniper Junos 8.4

knowledge. Any astute observer who cares to know is probably already in posession of the particular message necessary to cause the issue, and it can't be filtered, so yes you really do want to upgrade immediately. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG

Re: [j-nsp] GE/10GE link-mode config on M/T-series has no effect

is more about flow-control settings than duplex settings. I assume the situation with 10GE is similar. Re: GigE, you are very confused. The above is only true with 10GE. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C

Re: [j-nsp] Apparent m40 RPD memory leak

with a big file on the hd. :P In a real memory leak situation swap is a great safety net. The leaked pages will be inactive and easily swappable, without impacting the active pages being used by the rest of the system. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras

Re: [j-nsp] 8.5R1.13 Lock Manager and Database Initialization Utility

://www.birdstep.com/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2007/Juniper-Networks-Selects-Birdstep/ http://www.birdstep.com/Database/Products/RDM-Embedded/FAQ/ -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC

Re: [j-nsp] STM-4 and Gig LACP Connectivity between Juniper and Ciscogear

tagging on a Cisco and then try to speak LACP to a Juniper, it will try to tag the LACP control packets with the native vlan ID and confuse the hell out of the Juniper. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F

Re: [j-nsp] P-1GE-SX B rev?

interface. You can always do l2circuits to an untagged GE interface on any rev card. Only the single-port GE-SX cards were ever produced without this functionality, so if it isn't a P[EB]-1GE-SX it is automatically equiv to the GE-SX-B (LX, LH, 2GE, 4GE, etc). -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 40GE DPC

there are no differences in traditional Juniper features (same I-Chip 3.0 on both boards), so VPLS should be unaffected. I believe the Triton and Bellini cards are all rev B EZchips, so only the first gen Atlas cards will have the -E variant. And no AFAIk they don't do 100M. :) -- Richard

Re: [j-nsp] re333 not booting install media

, and then partition slice and format. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [j-nsp] re333 not booting install media

. Check those things, re-image the card, maybe try replacing it, and when you get the new install-media up you should be good. I'm told that new code does a better job doing the partition/slice/format on new drives, haven't tested it myself. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Cflow, IPFix which one

considering the vast majority of the references are confined to J/E series. The few references under M series all seem to be under AS PICs in the form of: Features: * J-Flow accounting exports cflowd version 5 and version 8 records Ah marketing and legal, how do we love thee... :) -- Richard

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Cflow, IPFix which one

obnoxious licensing fees or somesuch), I would encourage everyone to ask Juniper to implement sFlow support in addition to V9/IPFIX (especially as they grow into the L2 market with the MX platform). Hey, it could happen. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e

Re: [j-nsp] Image compatibility

with a Cisco label on it. :) So yeah, Juniper is certainly better about the entire thing than Cisco in pretty much all respects, but thats hardly saying much. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1

Re: [j-nsp] Image compatibility

. Then again so would being able to fetch an image from Juniper via ftp or from the router CLI instead of having to bust out lynx-ssl and scp. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC

[j-nsp] Using an LSP to transport analysis traffic

to create a dummy LSP for the transmit data when all I want to do is receive data to this particular interface. There really must be a better way. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Commit/Op Scripts and Archive

is Juniper decreasing the TTL. To know if I can limit the value to 255 or should allow 254 as well. Yeah actually I never got around to testing that one, someone do it for me and I'll update the scripts accordingly. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG

[j-nsp] Juniper Commit/Op Scripts and Archive

to Greg Maxwell, who managed to get a few good answers to my stupid questions in whenever Phil was asleep. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper firewall chain behavior

for this would be that then sample and then count act as terminating actions, which would seem exceedingly lame. Combine with the lack of next filter and what is the point? The whole thing becomes about as useful as route-map without continue. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper firewall chain behavior

{ then { count test; next term; } } -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] keyadmin error

could just get them to make with that garbage file on the T640... :) -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] Problem with PB-4GE-SX

it is a real challange to keep M160's working at all. The only really safe way is to run all FPC1's or configure M40e mode. -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper to Juniper, dark fiber, SONET vs SDH (not working any more)

things are nicer in 8.2, but we do not have it yet. :) Yes that has the great fix for people who do mixed-mode on a multi-port PIC. Can't you damn euros just admit that SONET is the way, the truth, and the light and end this silly bit squabbling. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED

<    1   2   3   4   5