Re: [j-nsp] Converting MD5 secrets to/from Cisco format?

Hi Joe, Juniper and Cisco use the same MD5 secret on condition that you use Cisco enable secret. In this way you can copy and paste the MD5 hash from a Juniper to Cisco router. That is why on Juniper router we can have a password with less of 7 characters. Regards, Samuel joe mcguckin

[j-nsp] JUNOS : prefix-list

-list within a firewall filter assumes a route-filter type of longer. Why this difference between a routing policy and a firewall filter? Regards, Samuel ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS : prefix-list

completions: exactExactly match the prefix length longer Mask is greater than the prefix length orlonger Mask is greater than or equal to the prefix length Thanks for this tip! Regards, Samuel ___ juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS : prefix-list

No it is not possible. For this use there are the route-filter. Regards, Samuel Amos Rosenboim a écrit : Hi List, This reminds me: Is it possible to have different match type for each different line in the prefix-list (similar to the Cisco implementation)? Amos On Feb 7, 2008, at 2:33

Re: [j-nsp] Series M Hardware Question

but the second one won't work. To put online or offline a PIC you will have to use this command: [EMAIL PROTECTED]request chassis pic fpc-slot fpc-slot pic-slot pic-slot offline I think I am right, but I have never tested ... Regards, Samuel ___ juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] JUNOS: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn ...

] at ata0-slave PIO4 Have you an idea of the meaning? Is it an hardware problem? A clean install can solve the problem? Thanks for your help. Regards, Samuel begin:vcard fn:Samuel GAY n:GAY;Samuel org:BT Infrastructures Critiques adr;quoted-printable:;;22 avenue Galil=C3=A9e;Le Plessis Robinson

Re: [j-nsp] The Switch is ON !!!

Did juniper buy out another switching company or is this their design from the ground up? It is their design from the ground up. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] GE/10GE link-mode config on M/T-series has no effect

10.0.0.1/24; } } } May be it could help you. Regards, Samuel begin:vcard fn:Samuel GAY n:GAY;Samuel org:BT Infrastructures Critiques adr;quoted-printable:;;22 avenue Galil=C3=A9e;Le Plessis Robinson;;92350;FRANCE email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Ing=C3=A9nieur r=C3

Re: [j-nsp] SNMPD_AUTH_FAILURE

this configuration : snmp { engine-id { use-mac-address; } } In this case the MD5 hash is genereted with the MAC address of the management interface (fxp0). http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos80/swconfig80-net-mgmt/html/snmp-v3-summary9.html Regards, Samuel Eric

Re: [j-nsp] L2 VPNs configuration

if it's better. Regards, Samuel Eugeniu Patrascu a écrit : Hi, I'm the process of learning MPLS and so far I figured out how L3 VPNs work, but I got stuck on L2 VPNs. I have a lab that consists of 2 CE devices (in form of netscreen SSGs) and 4 routers (2 of them as PE and two of them as P

Re: [j-nsp] L2 VPNs configuration

. The route-distinguisher must be different on each PE. A PE know where it must send traffic with this command : vrf-target target:65102:100; Regards, Samuel begin:vcard fn:Samuel GAY n:GAY;Samuel org:CS SI;Network Services adr;quoted-printable:;;22 avenue Galil=C3=A9e;Le Plessis Robinson;;92350

Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

Hi, Which kind of load balancing do you want to do ? layer 3 ? layer 4 ? Are you on a MPLS network ? Regards, Samuel Hamid Ahmed a écrit : Hi Everyone, CAn anyone suggest me how to load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost paths. BR// HA

Re: [j-nsp] l2circuit for frame relay

Relay DLCIs range 512 through 1022. DLCIs from 0 through 510 can be used for normal Frame Relay traffic. Regards, Samuel Hi Amos Depending on hardware/software , you may be able to configure encapsulation extended-frame-relay-ccc , this should remove this limitation cheers Sean

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS tunnel LSP establishment

I suppose that you use RSVP protocol to etablish the LSP. You can use the interface address or the router ID. I advise you to use router ID for a reason of scalability. Regards, Samuel Monika M a écrit : site1---PE1 - P1---P2---(x)-PE2site2 I have BGP peering between

Re: [j-nsp] Graceful restart for BGP-VPLS

tested with VPLS ... Regards, Samuel begin:vcard fn:Samuel GAY n:GAY;Samuel org:CS SI;Network Services adr;quoted-printable:;;22 avenue Galil=C3=A9e;Le Plessis Robinson;;92350;FRANCE email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Ing=C3=A9nieur Support tel;work:01 41 28 44 28 tel;cell:06 32 20