[j-nsp] Enhanced cFEB - Throughput

Hi All, Can anyone help me with Enhanced CFEB throughput for M10i/M7i pls. Whats is the throughput per PIC slot? Also, simialr values for normal cFEBs would also be helpful. Thanks ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.ne

Re: [j-nsp] Shaping per logical VLAN interface

I understand that "shaping-rate" refers to PIR and "guaranteed-rate" refers to CIR. Correct me if I'm wrong. Also, if your traffic is bursty in nature you may need to consider the burst-size in bytes what the telco is doing. Also, if you are using DPCs in MX you need to consider that they use t

Re: [j-nsp] Recommend JUNOS version for M7i with RE400

I've been running 10.4R8.5 (previous to 10.4R9) with that config in lab environment, didn't find any issues. But not sure about how many routes does the router in your scenario need to process? you may need to consider number of BGP peering session and no. of prefixes Cheers On Mon, Mar 19, 2012

Re: [j-nsp] Supported REs for M7i

Hi Phil, RE-1800s seems to be supported only 64-bit JUNOS (only the kernel is 64 bit, all other process are 32-bit). So, you may need to take that into account before deciding. Cheers On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mike Williams wrote: > Hey Phil, > > I can't confirm if the RE-1800 is shipping

Re: [j-nsp] Multihomed VPLS

In the later JUNOS versions, whle using CFM model of OAM, we an option of "interface-down" in action-profile, which can bring down the interface is CFM is down. I've not personally tested, but heard it seems to work. Cheers 2012/3/6 Ben Dale > > On 06/03/2012, at 7:38 PM, Jose María Carrera wro

[j-nsp] em0/em1 intreface

Hi All, Just wanted to clarify my understanding in emo and em1 interface. In the latest hardware (REs/CBs), juniper have replaced he fxp1 and fxp2 interface with em0 and em1. Is this right? Cheers ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] Re-write rule for GRE interface

/techpubs/en_US/junos9.6/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-cos/cos-classifying-packets-by-egress-interface.html > > HTH > ./diogo -montagner > > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Dale Shaw > > > wrote: > > Hi Shiva, > > > > On Monda

Re: [j-nsp] Re-write rule for GRE interface

ss-of-service interface > gr-x/y/z.abc" ? > > Regards > ./diogo -montagner > > > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Shiva Shankar > wrote: > > Hi All, I'm trying to mark the DSCP value on a GRE packet, so that the > telco > > can handle as per our con

[j-nsp] Re-write rule for GRE interface

Hi All, I'm trying to mark the DSCP value on a GRE packet, so that the telco can handle as per our contracted services. I've tried 'copy-tos-to-outer-ip-header', but it doesn't work as the inner datagram of a GRE packet is a MPLS datagram. Here, how it looks on the wire (found using packet capture)

[j-nsp] ifl and ifd list

Hi All, I was going through some commands and cos related statistics for in shell more. I can see most of the time IFL is associated with cos related statistics...Is there any documentation which explains the relation with IFD and IFL and how they are used to interact? Thanks _

[j-nsp] Kernal routes

Hi All, I happened to see certain route as 'Kernal' routes. Is there a link which explians about these in JUNOS? Cheers ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] ad1 msg on Juniper M series

Hi All, Of late I had replaced the Internal compact flash on Juniper M7is and Juniper 10is. The root is mounted on ad0 (CF), but found that 'write cache' is disabled on ad1...has anyone seen this before..No impact on box performance... truncated o/p of 'show system boot-messaged sio3 at por

Re: [j-nsp] snapshot partition

Fromthe logs, it seems that it has not detected ad0 properly. can you check if you have the JUNOS on the roter... Cheers On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Onam Rubio wrote: > > Hello experts, > > I need to replace the Compact Flash(CF) of my Juniper M10 but when I do the > "request system snapsh

[j-nsp] Viewing default config on JUNOS

Hello all, is there a way to view default config of certain defaults in JUNOS...like _default_arp_policer or default_scheduler etc.. Cheers ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] cannot see hard disk

can you check if you have hard-dish using the following commands: show chassis hardware details show system boot-messaages... if not, you should have seen some hardware errors or logs relating to hard-disk..if yes, replace the RE... cheers On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Erol KAHRAMAN wrote:

Re: [j-nsp] Load balacing issue - M7i

the hashing algorithm. > > For the label 1, i still confuse if the router uses top label which is > transport mpls label or bottom label which is vpn label. Maybe the experts > here can shed a light on this :) > > BR, > Benny > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Shiva Shankar w

Re: [j-nsp] reliable static routing/ip tracking

I think 'Generate routes with policy' would suit your needs generate{ route *destination-prefix* { policy

[j-nsp] Load balacing issue - M7i

Hi Gebts Ladies.A quick question on load balancing on juniper M7i running Junos 8.4R2..The config I have on the router is: family mpls { label-1; payload { ip; } } The documentation says, for load-balacing (or load sharing per flow), the above uses label-1 (which is VPN label) and bits of IP

Re: [j-nsp] Slot zero on the ERX chassis

Do you have redundant slot comnibation for slot 0,1&2..if so, then you can't mis-match different card... Cheers On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > > > -Original Message- > Is there an issue where the ERX will not accept a DS3-4P I/O and > OC3/OC12/DS3-ATM card set in

Re: [j-nsp] Why a transit area cannot be a stub area?

I believe, the way virtual links are defined is to establish a link to a destination in another area...In an environment where the trabsit area is a stub, its not a good idea to agree to carry virtual link based on a defult route (as Type 3 LSA)... On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Paulo Estante

[j-nsp] J series - files copy from removable media

Hi AllOn a J series router (say J2320 and above) the the internal CF is acting as Primary boot media (which is caged inside the chassis). The external (or secodary) boot media is on the rear, which acts as secondary boot media...Is there a way where we can copy a file from secondary (external)

Re: [j-nsp] Hardware issue with M7i

It seems that the hard-drive is faulty (meaning RE)don't you have Compact Flash (ad0) installed on the RE..if not, you need replace the RE.. Cheers On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Brendan Mannella wrote: > > > All, > > > > My juniper m7i suddently rebooted today. The logs show the following

Re: [j-nsp] re-write rules - query

restriction >> >> that is referenced (3-bit TOS) in your example exists when the rewrite >> >> is >> >> done on the IPv4 payload ingress to an LSP. >> >> >> >> 2. The link below covers how to modify the EXP and TOS bits at LSP >> >

Re: [j-nsp] re-write rules - query

d on the egress PE interface. > > > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos9.5/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-cos/cos-rewriting-mpls-and-ipv4-packet-headers.html#id-11667692 > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Shiva Shankar wrote: > >> Gents, Try to u

[j-nsp] re-write rules - query

Gents, Try to understand in depth re-write rules in M/J series...From JUNOS 9.5 notes I found the following: *For every incoming packet, the ingress classifier decodes the ingress CoS bits into a forwarding class and packet loss priority (PLP) combination. The egress CoS information depends on wh

[j-nsp] re-wite rules - query

Gents, Try to understand in depth re-write rules in M/J series...From JUNOS 9.5 notes I found the following: *For every incoming packet, the ingress classifier decodes the ingress CoS bits into a forwarding class and packet loss priority (PLP) combination. The egress CoS information depends on whi

Re: [j-nsp] syscall msgs - J series

Thanks Gents... On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Eric Van Tol wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- > > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Shiva Shankar > > Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:1

Re: [j-nsp] syscall msgs - J series

the image is JUNOS-jseries-8.4R2.3 On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Shiva Shankar wrote: > Hi All, > > I can see the following messages on the J series logs more often... > > /kernel: chassisd pid 2944 syscall 54 ran for 1277.130 ms > > The process 2944 is > > 2944

[j-nsp] syscall msgs - J series

Hi All, I can see the following messages on the J series logs more often... /kernel: chassisd pid 2944 syscall 54 ran for 1277.130 ms The process 2944 is 2944 0 1 6 2 0 6276 select Thu06PM ?? S584:09.00 /usr/sbin/ The CPU utilization seems to be fine...any insights into this