Re: [j-nsp] SNMP very slow on MX10003

2020-05-25 Thread david.roy
You hit sometimes high response time ( > 14 secs) to collect stats of AE's units. Could you correlate this timestamp with significant changes on the router of routing events ? -Message d'origine- De : Leon Kramer [mailto:leonkra...@gmail.com] Envoyé : lundi 25 mai 2020 18:42 À : ROY

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP very slow on MX10003

2020-05-25 Thread david.roy
Hello Could you issue this command & share the output : show snmp stats-response-statistics Otherwise, we use telemetry to collect, among other things, interface stats. David -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de Leon

Re: [j-nsp] BGP PIC for inet6

2017-11-21 Thread david.roy
Hello For ipv6 set routing-options rib inet6.0 protect core For ipv4 set routing-options protect core David Roy IP/MPLS NOC engineer - Orange France Ph. : +33 2 99 28 57 66 Mob. : +33 6 85 52 22 13 SkypeID : davidroy.35 david@orange.com   JNCIE x3 (SP #703 ; ENT #305 ; SEC #144)

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS Telemetry

2017-04-11 Thread david.roy
Actually, not sure your release supports it. Indeed Junos Telemetry Interface was introduced in Junos OS Release 15.1F3. not sure R branch supports it -Message d'origine- De : Shaffi Khan [mailto:shaf...@interxion.com] Envoyé : mardi 11 avril 2017 17:27 À : ROY David DTSI/DERS;

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS Telemetry

2017-04-11 Thread david.roy
Strange. It works for me. Maybe a bug or a limitation with your version ? Did you try to force SDN-telemetry restart ? -Message d'origine- De : Shaffi Khan [mailto:shaf...@interxion.com] Envoyé : mardi 11 avril 2017 15:57 À : ROY David DTSI/DERS; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : RE:

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS Telemetry

2017-04-11 Thread david.roy
I've tried you config on Junos 16.1R4 and it works for me. David -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de Shaffi Khan Envoyé : mardi 11 avril 2017 15:05 À : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : [j-nsp] JunOS Telemetry I've just

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS Telemetry

2017-04-11 Thread david.roy
Ok. Could you check at PFE level if sensors are well instanced ? start shell pfe network fpcX show agent sensors ex. show agent sensors Jvision ID Name -- 13222432 sensor-13 5000(300) 13222433 sensor-12 5000(4902)

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS Telemetry

2017-04-11 Thread david.roy
Hello Does agent is running ? show system processes extensive | match agentd 26812 root 3 200 735M 13136K nanslp 1 0:15 0.00% agentd You could try to restart process : restart SDN-Telemetry immediately I see your polling interval is very high David -Message

Re: [j-nsp] FPC Error Debug

2016-11-09 Thread david.roy
Hello Usually it means either : - transient HW error (Parity error - a reboot can fix it) - HW failure of LUCHIP memory >> RMA David Roy IP/MPLS NOC engineer - Orange France Ph. : +33 2 99 28 57 66 Mob. : +33 6 85 52 22 13 SkypeID : davidroy.35 david@orange.com   JNCIE x3 (SP #703 ;

Re: [j-nsp] force-64bit

2016-06-01 Thread david.roy
Hello We use it since Junos 14.2. No bug encountered related to this feature. It depends on your sizing. As Tim said check the RPD memory - Just never reach the 80%. David Tim Hoffman via juniper-nsp a écrit 64bit RPD is newer, and by nature will have more bugs - so don't run

Re: [j-nsp] what’s the story behind MPC5E

2016-05-20 Thread david.roy
This is the same design for MPC6e PFE and I didn't see any issue with this design. I also didn't see any specific issue due to this design in POC where we stressed the PFE. XL ressources are just shared. For Inter XM forwarding, the shared XL is not used but the fabric links is used.

Re: [j-nsp] what’s the story behind MPC5E

2016-05-20 Thread david.roy
Erratum: it's a 240 Gbps PFE -Message d'origine- De : ROY David DTSI/DERS Envoyé : vendredi 20 mai 2016 16:24 À : 'Adam Vitkovsky'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : RE: what’s the story behind MPC5E MPC5e has one PFE (260Gpbs) made of 2 XM chip, 1 XL and 1 XQ (only for Q mode)

Re: [j-nsp] what’s the story behind MPC5E

2016-05-20 Thread david.roy
MPC5e has one PFE (260Gpbs) made of 2 XM chip, 1 XL and 1 XQ (only for Q mode) -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de Adam Vitkovsky Envoyé : vendredi 20 mai 2016 16:20 À : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : [j-nsp] what’s the

Re: [j-nsp] Segment Routing ( SPRING )

2016-03-04 Thread david.roy
Yes this exactly the same thing. Just naming. Cisco uses more SR and Juniper SPRING :) But IETF says SPRING -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de Aaron Envoyé : vendredi 4 mars 2016 16:17 À : 'Timur Maryin'; 'Jackson, William'

Re: [j-nsp] Segment Routing ( SPRING )

2016-03-04 Thread david.roy
Yes it's me :) -Message d'origine- De : Aaron [mailto:aar...@gvtc.com] Envoyé : vendredi 4 mars 2016 16:23 À : ROY David DTSI/DERS; 'Timur Maryin'; 'Jackson, William' Cc : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : RE: [j-nsp] Segment Routing ( SPRING ) Thanks David, I should've read this

Re: [j-nsp] Segment Routing ( SPRING )

2016-03-04 Thread david.roy
FYI : The MPLS in the SDN Era book covers SPRING implementation for both Cisco and Juniper routers. David -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de Timur Maryin Envoyé : vendredi 4 mars 2016 12:55 À : Jackson, William Cc :

Re: [j-nsp] Firwall Counter IPv6 : MIB

2015-12-11 Thread david.roy
Actually it works. My filter was not in interface-specific mode. David De : ROY David DTSI/DERS Envoyé : jeudi 10 décembre 2015 18:45 À : Nitzan Tzelniker Cc : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : RE : [j-nsp] Firwall Counter IPv6 : MIB Does anybody has a setup with FWF MIB counters for IPv6

Re: [j-nsp] Firwall Counter IPv6 : MIB

2015-12-10 Thread david.roy
Does anybody has a setup with FWF MIB counters for IPv6 that work in recent release? Appreciate your help. BR David Message d'origine De : ROY David DTSI/DERS Date :08/12/2015 16:18 (GMT+01:00) À : Nitzan Tzelniker Cc : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : RE: [j-nsp] Firwall

Re: [j-nsp] Firwall Counter IPv6 : MIB

2015-12-08 Thread david.roy
Thank you. In 12.3 it doesn’t work. Does your interface is a dual stack interface ? David De : Nitzan Tzelniker [mailto:nitzan.tzelni...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 8 décembre 2015 15:54 À : ROY David DTSI/DERS Cc : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : Re: [j-nsp] Firwall Counter IPv6 : MIB Hi

[j-nsp] Firwall Counter IPv6 : MIB

2015-12-07 Thread david.roy
Hello All We tried to retrieve IPv6 Firewall Filter counters within the jnxFirewalls MIB. It works well for IPv4 for a long time but we are not able to do the same for v6. OID are there but their value are all to 0. Did anyone experience the same issue ? Is there a workaround - or a specific

Re: [j-nsp] exception traffic types for Juniper routers

2015-09-29 Thread david.roy
Hello Check show pfe statistics exceptions David Message d'origine De : Martin T Date :29/09/2015 21:40 (GMT+01:00) À : juniper-nsp Objet : [j-nsp] exception traffic types for Juniper routers Hi, as I understand, there are several different exception traffic types: 1)

Re: [j-nsp] L2VPN between Juniper MX and SmartEdge

2015-07-10 Thread david.roy
Here the config part of SE : l2vpn profile L2PROFILE peer X.X.X.X log-pw-up-down remote-encap ethernet l2vpn xc-group collect xc lg GEC3 vlan-id 1668 vc-id 1668 profile L2PROFILE David Roy IP/MPLS NOC engineer - Orange France Ph. : +33 2 99 28 57 66 Mob. : +33 6 85 52 22

Re: [j-nsp] L2VPN between Juniper MX and SmartEdge

2015-07-09 Thread david.roy
Hello Here my config on MX which works with SE routers: xe-19/0/2 { vlan-tagging; mtu 4488; encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services; unit 1668 { encapsulation vlan-ccc; vlan-id 1668; input-vlan-map pop;

Re: [j-nsp] L2VPN between Juniper MX and SmartEdge

2015-07-09 Thread david.roy
I don't remember... i will find back tomorrow and send you the config of SE part Message d'origine De : Olivier Benghozi Date :09/07/2015 23:26 (GMT+01:00) À : ROY David DTSI/DERS Cc : redback-...@puck.nether.net, juniper-nsp Objet : Re: [j-nsp] L2VPN between Juniper MX and

Re: [j-nsp] IP-FRR (LFA) -restrict the computation

2015-06-16 Thread david.roy
Hello Did you have a look at this: http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos14.1/topics/topic-map/example-configuring-backup-selection-path-for-is-is-protocol.html BR David David Roy IP/MPLS NOC engineer - Orange France Ph. : +33 2 99 28 57 66 Mob. : +33 6 85 52 22 13 SkypeID :

Re: [j-nsp] Multi Core on JUNOS?

2015-05-08 Thread david.roy
Alu uses 10 cores. Br Message d'origine De : Colton Conor Date :08/05/2015 20:09 (GMT+01:00) À : Mark Tinka Cc : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : Re: [j-nsp] Multi Core on JUNOS? So are the other vendors, Brocade, Cisco and ALU all single core in software as well, or is

Re: [j-nsp] Full BGP table, one provider w/ 2 routers, slow forwarding convergence

2014-08-22 Thread david.roy
I've planned to test this precious enhancement in the 14.2 beta program :) David   David Roy IP/MPLS NOC engineer - Orange France Ph. : +33 2 99 87 64 72 Mob. : +33 6 85 52 22 13 SkypeID : davidroy.35 david@orange.com   JNCIE x3 (SP #703 ; ENT #305 ; SEC #144) -Original

Re: [j-nsp] Verifying Juniper ECMP

2014-04-15 Thread david.roy
Hello Since 13.2 Jsim is now available also for MPC (at PFE level) but it is more complex and quite different as Jsim for DPC. I have to write a new blog about that... :) David   David Roy IP/MPLS NOC engineer - Orange France Ph. : +33 2 99 87 64 72 Mob. : +33 6 85 52 22 13 SkypeID :

Re: [j-nsp] MX ping - ToS overrided

2014-01-22 Thread david.roy
Not the case with 12.3R4 for me : ping 8.8.8.8 tos 96 15:37:03.950763 Out IP (tos 0x60, ttl 64, id 64980, offset 0, flags [none], proto: ICMP (1), length: 84) X.X.X.X 8.8.8.8: ICMP echo request, id 34658, seq 3, length 64 Do you have host-inbound-traffic knob or Output FWF on lo0 that

Re: [j-nsp] MX ping - ToS overrided

2014-01-22 Thread david.roy
I meant host-outbound-traffic ;)   David Roy IP/MPLS NOC engineer - Orange France Ph. : +33 2 99 87 64 72 Mob. : +33 6 85 52 22 13 SkypeID : davidroy.35 david@orange.com   JNCIE x3 (SP #703 ; ENT #305 ; SEC #143) -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] smartctl for junos

2014-01-08 Thread david.roy
Hi Smartd tool can be used via the hidden cli command : request chassis routing-engine hard-disk-test regards David   David Roy IP/MPLS NOC engineer - Orange France Ph. : +33 2 99 87 64 72 Mob. : +33 6 85 52 22 13 SkypeID : davidroy.35 david@orange.com   // JNCIE-SP

Re: [j-nsp] Ex stack of 4 switchs stops routing, switching, ...

2014-01-06 Thread david.roy
Je vais refaire un mail. David   David Roy IP/MPLS NOC engineer - Orange France Ph. : +33 2 99 87 64 72 Mob. : +33 6 85 52 22 13 SkypeID : davidroy.35 david@orange.com   // JNCIE-SP #703 JNCIE-ENT #305 JNCIP-SEC -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Ex stack of 4 switchs stops routing, switching, ...

2014-01-06 Thread david.roy
Oups ! a little mistake. Sorry for the spam. -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de david@orange.com Envoyé : lundi 6 janvier 2014 11:21 À : 'Maarten van der Hoek'; 'Laurent CARON' Cc : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet :

Re: [j-nsp] command monitor

2013-10-08 Thread david.roy
set interfaces x unit 0 family inet sampling input|output Regards David   David Roy IP/MPLS NOC engineer - Orange France Ph. : +33 2 99 87 64 72 Mob. : +33 6 85 52 22 13 SkypeID : davidroy.35 david@orange.com   // JNCIE-SP #703 JNCIE-ENT #305 JNCIP-SEC

Re: [j-nsp] Output queue drops and temporal buffers

2013-10-01 Thread david.roy
Hi We experienced unexpected drops with temporal buffer (which is a static buffer) and iCHIP based cards. It was in junos 11.4. Jtac had found an internal PR that matched our issue. Workaround was the using buffer-size in %. Which version and cards do you use? David Envoyé de mon iPad

Re: [j-nsp] qfx3500

2013-09-03 Thread david.roy
Hello Yes you can use qfx3500 as a standalone switch. David Le 3 sept. 2013 à 21:28, Robert Hass robh...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi I'm looking for 1U switch with minimum 48x10GE SFP+ and 2x40GE QSFP. I see than QFX3500 can do all what I need - can this switch work alone without rest elements

Re: [j-nsp] Wierd problem with RE-based sampling on 12.3

2013-08-02 Thread david.roy
Hello Did you try only input direction? I guess yes and i guess it works but just to be sure. I Netflow v5 12.3 work fine for us on dpc but we use only input sampling. David Tom Eichhorn t...@wirkbetrieb.net a écrit : Dear all, I have a very curious problem with some box running JunOS

Re: [j-nsp] multicast issue

2013-07-16 Thread david.roy
Hello, We use mcast streams dedicated for multicast monitoring which are flooded to the entire network (some specific (S;G) ). we are able to start / stop automatically these streams. We developed a perl script which does : While(1) ( - Stop multicast monitoring streams - Get via SNMP GET

Re: [j-nsp] R: RE : multicast issue

2013-07-16 Thread david.roy
If you can't start/stop manually mcast streams you will never have stable counters and can't detect packet loss. What you could do is to monitor customer mcast rate per (S,G) with the same snmp counters but it requieres you have constant bit rate for your (S,G). We have also this kind of script

Re: [j-nsp] Inline jflow AS Lookup Failures

2013-07-05 Thread david.roy
I tested RPKI on a beta 12.2 and found a major bug but now fixed. 12.3 works fine for us since 2 months. But, of course without nsr ;-) David Envoyé depuis mon Samsung Galaxy Ace d'Orange Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu a écrit : On Monday, July 01, 2013 05:02:33 PM Mark Tinka wrote: The

Re: [j-nsp] Inline jflow AS Lookup Failures

2013-07-01 Thread david.roy
Hi 12.3 runs on several mx960 with mpc4e cards since several months without any issue. Note. We don't use NSR and we use a service release that includes some fix of bugs found during our qualification tests in lab. For me 12.3 is a good release, but in our config. Envoyé depuis mon Samsung

Re: [j-nsp] Alarm

2013-04-17 Thread david.roy
Hi, Try this start shell su Password: Enter root pwd Then : sysctl -a | grep bootdevs I guess disk should be not present in the list. Then, sysctl -w machdep.bootdevs=usb,compact-flash,disk,lan Then exit the shell mode and restart the RE request system reload If you lose

Re: [j-nsp] Alarm

2013-04-17 Thread david.roy
s/reload/reboot/g Sorry :-/ David Roy IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France Ph. +33 2 99 87 64 72 - Mob. +33 6 85 52 22 13 david@orange.com JNCIE-MT/SP #703 - JNCIE-ENT #305 - JNCIP-SEC -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la

Re: [j-nsp] ability to turn USB port on/off for MX routing engine?

2013-03-19 Thread david.roy
You can at least remove it from the boot list via sysctl cmd Envoyé de mon iPad Le 19 mars 2013 à 19:53, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com a écrit : I can see turning off USB from a security stand point, like disabling console toobut then again in the event of needing to restore the device

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIE-SP LAB Exam

2013-03-11 Thread david.roy
I recommend the inetzero workbook : https://www.inetzero.com/workbooks-jncie-sp/ David Roy IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France Ph. +33 2 99 87 64 72 - Mob. +33 6 85 52 22 13 david@orange.com JNCIE-MT/SP #703 - JNCIE-ENT #305 - JNCIP-SEC -Message d'origine- De :

[j-nsp] RE : JNCIE-SP LAB Exam

2013-03-10 Thread david.roy
Hello Junosphere is a good choice. David De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] de la part de Farhat Abbasse [ab_ferha...@hotmail.co.uk] Date d'envoi : dimanche 10 mars 2013 10:03 À : juniper juniper Objet :

Re: [j-nsp] 11.4R6-S2 feedback ?

2013-02-28 Thread david.roy
Thank you for this feedback. Regards David David Roy IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France Ph. +33 2 99 87 64 72 - Mob. +33 6 85 52 22 13 david@orange.com JNCIE-MT/SP #703 - JNCIE-ENT #305 - JNCIP-SEC -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

[j-nsp] 11.4R6-S2 feedback ?

2013-02-27 Thread david.roy
Hi all Does anybody use this version in production ? if yes, did you experience some SW issues with it? Many thanks for your feedback David David Roy IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France Ph. +33 2 99 87 64 72 - Mob. +33 6 85 52 22 13 david@orange.commailto:david@orange.com

Re: [j-nsp] MTU problems over VPLS

2013-02-13 Thread david.roy
Which release do you use ? Experienced some mpls mtu issue on trio platform. Known PR... Envoyé de mon iPad Le 12 févr. 2013 à 22:17, Luca Salvatore l...@ninefold.com a écrit : I have a few sites connected via a VPLS core. The core devices are all MX 10 routers connected via 10Gb fibre.

Re: [j-nsp] MTU problems over VPLS

2013-02-13 Thread david.roy
We hit this PR but should be fixed in your release. Double check with JTAC if there is no regression or corner case? David Problem Report Number PR568550 Title With default settings,4 bytes lesser ip payload can be sent when MX-80 is acting as P router compared to M7i Release Note MPLS MTU

[j-nsp] 6PE + mpls no-propagate-ttl

2013-01-23 Thread david.roy
Hello Did somebody have got trouble with no-propagate-ttl on 6PE environment ? It seems that it doesn't work for me in 11.4 Many thanks David David Roy IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France Ph. +33 2 99 87 64 72 - Mob. +33 6 85 52 22 13 david@orange.commailto:david@orange.com

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE + mpls no-propagate-ttl

2013-01-23 Thread david.roy
Sorry I sent a mail too fast. Actually it works, my test was wrong. FYI : We used LDP for transport labels Thank you for the tip with RSVP. Best regards David David Roy IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France Ph. +33 2 99 87 64 72 - Mob. +33 6 85 52 22 13 david@orange.com

Re: [j-nsp] EX switches and bpdu-block-on-edge

2013-01-14 Thread david.roy
Should be work but I experienced one time a bug with interface all not for mstp but for ISIS on MX platform : ldp-sync on interface all, didn't work as expected. But if it works in lab for your feature, I think it will be good. Beware, when you need upgrade, check before in lab if there is no

Re: [j-nsp] LACP support on forwarding plane on M10i?

2012-10-30 Thread david.roy
Hello, Not supported. You can see LACP packets punted to the RE if you use monitor trafic interface xxx or if you check ppm remote adjacencies there is no LACP adj up at PFE level : show ppm adjacencies remote (hidden cmd) For exemple on MX you have LACP distributed at PFE : mymx@mx show

[j-nsp] RE : Re: MX80 no more hash-key option in 12.2?

2012-10-23 Thread david.roy
Yes and you can check current hash config with the pfe cmd request pfe execute command show jnh lb target fpcX X=slot David Envoyé depuis mon Samsung Galaxy Ace d'Orange Doug Hanks dha...@juniper.net a écrit : Pretty much. enhanced-hash-hey does a lot by default. Harry can elaborate. On

[j-nsp] RE : Re: RE : Re: MX80 no more hash-key option in 12.2?

2012-10-23 Thread david.roy
Sorry i forgot that it was a mx80 i play too much with mx960. Yes sounds good. You can see that trio based card like mx80 adds by default layer 4 in the key buffer. Unlike ichip based card. I written a post regarding this on my blog. Http://www.junosandme.net Regards David Envoyé depuis mon

[j-nsp] IPv6 Packet too big !

2012-10-19 Thread david.roy
Hi all, Does anybody know which source IPv6 address is used by a Juniper router to send back an ICMPv6 Packet too Big. If I configure the default address selection feature and have an IPv6 address on my loopback ? Does it use this address or still use the IPv6 interface address ? thanks David

Re: [j-nsp] Assigning Forwarding Class and DSCP Value for Routing Engine-Generated Traffic

2012-10-10 Thread david.roy
Hi I do Not use that. Why you do not using host-outbound-traffic feature ? http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-cos/changing-fc-dscp.html#changing-fc-dscp David David Roy IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France Ph. +33 2

[j-nsp] Trigger Trap when interface is overloaded

2012-10-02 Thread david.roy
Hi all, Is-there an easy way (without accounting-profile / event-script) to generate a trap or a syslog when interface reach 95% of load (for example) ? Platform MX / release 11.4 Many thanks Best regards David David Roy IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France Ph. +33 2 99 87 64 72 -

Re: [j-nsp] Trigger Trap when interface is overloaded

2012-10-02 Thread david.roy
Thanks Yes I saw that but I'm not sure that this config is scalable and sometimes ifindex are not persistant after reboot. Best regards David David Roy IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France Ph. +33 2 99 87 64 72 - Mob. +33 6 85 52 22 13 david@orange.com JNCIE-MT/SP #703 -

[j-nsp] RE : route BGP stall bug

2012-07-18 Thread david.roy
Hi How many groups do you have? David Roy NOC Engineer at Orange France JNCIE-SP #703 ; JNCIE-ENT #305 De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] de la part de Richard A Steenbergen [r...@e-gerbil.net] Date d'envoi

[j-nsp] RE : Woot. Updated MX software recommendation

2012-04-11 Thread david.roy
Hi all, I do not encounter SNMP issue anymore since the upgrade in 11.4R2.14. Same test like in 11.4R1 Strange ? Best regards David De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] de la part de Alexandre Snarskii

Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E

2012-02-08 Thread david.roy
Hi, Same results on my side... Just a precision to be sure that there is no mis-understanding : it's not triggered by SCB-E, it is a software issue... But currently we only have this release to play with SCB-E :-) Regards David David Roy IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France Ph. +33

[j-nsp] RE : Re: BGP routes processing

2011-11-20 Thread david.roy
Hi 20 mins is not normal. During the outage, did you experience some kernel queues stuck ? Show krt queue did you check the logs to see if there are some info to help you for troubleshooting. Enable bgp traceoption to see more info... what is the bgp peer of the mx? Regards David Roy Sent

[j-nsp] LAG + ECMP MX MPC

2011-11-03 Thread david.roy
Hi all, Does anybody have experienced ECMP LAGs. I mean, MX MPC only support 16 links per LAG until the 12.2, so we need to split more than 16 links in 2 LAGs, and each LAG will have the same cost. For exemple 2 LAGs with 10 links per LAG ? Any experience, bug, limitation ??? Thanks Regards

Re: [j-nsp] LSP Refresh ISIS

2011-09-07 Thread david.roy
Thks. That could be the reason... David David Roy Orange - IP Domestic Backbone - TAC Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com Skype : davidroy.35 JNCIE-M/T #703(SP #1168) -Message d'origine- De : Vladimir Blazhkun

[j-nsp] LSP Refresh ISIS

2011-09-06 Thread david.roy
Hi all, Just for my understanding. Does anybody know why juniper uses LSP Lifetime-317 secs for its max-LSP-origination-interval ? The ISO recommends LSP Lifetime - 300. Why 317 secs ? Thanks David David Roy Orange - IP Domestic Backbone - TAC Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213

[j-nsp] RE : ECMP vs LAG and OAM vs BFD

2011-08-16 Thread david.roy
De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] de la part de Rafael Rodriguez [packetjoc...@gmail.com] Date d'envoi : vendredi 29 juillet 2011 22:08 À : Daniel Verlouw Cc : Juniper Puck Objet : Re: [j-nsp] ECMP vs LAG and

[j-nsp] PSN-2011-07-298 - More info

2011-07-15 Thread david.roy
Hi all, Does anybody have more info regarding this new Tech Bulletin ? I tried to reproduce the issue in lab on my T640 FPC type 3 without success. Thanks Best Regards David Roy Orange - IP Domestic Backbone - TAC Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email.

[j-nsp] RE : Matching communities in 'show route receive-protocol bgp' command

2011-07-06 Thread david.roy
Hi From the Junos Guide : The output displays the selected routes and the attributes with which they were received, but does not show the effects of import policy on the routing attributes REgards David De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

[j-nsp] RE : Perempt hold-down time on vrrp

2011-07-06 Thread david.roy
Hi Hold-time on Junos is only available when Vrrpd restart (It is usually used when VRRP crash or RE reboot or RE switchover without NSR) Regards David De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] de la part de

Re: [j-nsp] RE : ALS on Juniper

2011-06-29 Thread david.roy
Hi Alex, I thought to use it, but in my case I can't use source-filtering because my interface is within an AE. And I don't want to source-filter on the entire AE but on a specific interface of the AE. David David Roy Orange - IP Domestic Backbone - TAC Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob.

[j-nsp] ALS on Juniper

2011-06-28 Thread david.roy
Hi all, Do you know if Junos provides ALS (Automatic Laser Shutdown) configuration ? Like Cisco (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/install_config/ES40_config_guide/es40_chap11.pdf) Thks Regards David David Roy Orange - IP Domestic Backbone - TAC Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob.

[j-nsp] RE : ALS on Juniper

2011-06-28 Thread david.roy
Hi thank you. What I try to do is to simulate an unidirectionnal link failure (for OAM LFM tests). So I'm not sure that there is a way to disable ALS. Regards David De : Ben Dale [bd...@comlinx.com.au] Date d'envoi : mardi 28 juin 2011 12:46 À : ROY

[j-nsp] RE : Bad time and date on firewall log.

2011-06-08 Thread david.roy
Hi, Did you try to check the time at PFE level : request pfe execute command show sntp target fpcX Regards, David De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] de la part de David Lockuan [dlock...@gmail.com] Date

[j-nsp] RE : RE : Bad time and date on firewall log.

2011-06-08 Thread david.roy
yep ! So I guess you don't use NTP. Try this : edit ex set system ntp boot-server 127.0.0.1 set system ntp server 127.0.0.1 commit sync and-quit And check RE system uptime and sntp at PFE level I believe it works but I don't know if it's supported by Juniper ;-) Regards, David

[j-nsp] RE : RE : RE : Bad time and date on firewall log.

2011-06-08 Thread david.roy
oups I forgot : set interface lo0 unit 0 family inet address 127.0.0.1 De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] de la part de david@orange-ftgroup.com [david@orange-ftgroup.com] Date d'envoi : mercredi 8 juin

[j-nsp] RE : Missing interface ID in RE based sflow export from M7i

2011-05-21 Thread david.roy
Hi, Maybe you hit this recent PR : JUNOS Problem Report Information NUMBER 598135 SEVERITYmajor CATEGORYsw STATE open SYNOPSISCFLOW records have interface index as 0 for any interfaces with index greater than 8192 RELEASE NOTEMaximum number of service IFL's

[j-nsp] ISIS between ERX 1440 and MX960

2011-05-19 Thread david.roy
Hi all, I'm trying to establish an ISIS L2 adjacency between an ERX (Junose is new for me) and 1 MX without success : I double checked the mtu, subnet, Area (not checked for L2), authentication key (I tried simple and MD5 types) The problem seems to be at the ERX side. Indeed, the MX receives

Re: [j-nsp] ISIS between ERX 1440 and MX960

2011-05-19 Thread david.roy
Hi Payam, I'm trying with ERX not EX. Thanks David -Message d'origine- De : Payam Chychi [mailto:pchy...@gmail.com] Envoyé : jeudi 19 mai 2011 19:46 À : ROY David DTF/DERX Cc : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : Re: [j-nsp] ISIS between ERX 1440 and MX960 Hey David, by default on

Re: [j-nsp] ISIS between ERX 1440 and MX960

2011-05-19 Thread david.roy
Hi Thanks 1. yes 2. I tried but without success. I believe that the ISO MTU is less than the padded hello of the MX. I will try to set mtu of the gi 12/0 of the ERX to 1518 : I will update you if it works Regards David David Roy Orange - IP Domestic Backbone - TAC Tel.

[j-nsp] 802.3ah OAM LFM

2011-05-16 Thread david.roy
Hi all, I would appreciate to have any feedback regarding 802.3ah OAM Link-Fault Management on MX (DPC and MPC) and T series (FPC3 T640 and FPC4 for T1600). Does it work well ? Did you experience some issues ? Thanks a lot Regards David

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 - restricted bundles and disabled 10G ports.

2011-04-13 Thread david.roy
Hi all, Does anybody know if Juniper's MPC cards support SFP+ ZR (80km) modules ? Thanks Regards David David Roy Orange - IP Domestic Backbone - TAC Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com JNCIE-M/T #703 ; JNCIS-ENT

Re: [j-nsp] Too much packet loss during switchover on MPLS network

2011-03-14 Thread david.roy
Hi, Which version and HW do you use ? Did you monitor forwarding database on each PE to check if there is any change (MAC address refresh) after your 41 sec of outage ? Did you experience the same issue when your primary LSP comes up (and after the revert timout) ? Regards David David

Re: [j-nsp] Too much packet loss during switchover on MPLS network

2011-03-14 Thread david.roy
Sorry, Which release ? Your secondary path is well in Standby mode ? Could you enable traffic stat for LSP with a short interval ? And check during the blackholing where the LSP is broken on the path (by checking LSP stat on nodes before and after the failure ) ? thks regards David David

Re: [j-nsp] SFTP on junos 9.0 routers

2011-03-02 Thread david.roy
Hi, You can use scp. Regards, David David Roy Orange - IP Domestic Backbone - TAC Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com JNCIE-M/T #703 ; JNCIS-ENT -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] Debug vmcore files

2011-03-01 Thread david.roy
Hi, You can also use the cli command : show system core-dumps core-file-info detail core-filename Regards, David David Roy Orange - IP Domestic Backbone - TAC Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com JNCIE-M/T #703 ; JNCIS-ENT -Message

[j-nsp] JNCIS-ENT - Software to prepare for exam

2010-12-22 Thread david.roy
Hi all, Is there a tool, like Boson software, to prepare for the new JNCIS-ENT exam ? thks, regards, David * This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIS-ENT - Software to prepare for exam

2010-12-22 Thread david.roy
Thank you. David Roy Orange France - RBCI IP Technical Assistance Center Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com -Message d'origine- De : Jared Gull [mailto:jmg...@yahoo.com] Envoyé : mercredi 22 décembre 2010 15:53 À :

[j-nsp] Total packets OID

2010-08-31 Thread david.roy
Hi all, Is-there a specific OID to get the total input packets of a specific interface (that we show with the cli commands show interface xe-x/x/x ext). I saw the if-mib and the jnx-if-extension mibs but we've only separate counter for unicast, broadcast and mcast in the if-mib and nothing in

Re: [j-nsp] Disable ICMP Time Exceeded

2010-04-30 Thread david.roy
Hi, Yes ICMP is handled by the CPU of the PFE. We can check ICMP throttled at this level. As you said, a firewall filter at the interface level works. Thank you Regards, David David Roy Orange France - RBCI IP Technical Assistance Center Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email.

[j-nsp] Disable ICMP Time Exceeded

2010-04-29 Thread david.roy
Hi all, Is-there a way to disable or rate-limit (in junos) the sending of ICMP Time Exceeded when the box receives datagrams with a TTL expired. Thank you David * This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and intended solely for the

Re: [j-nsp] BGP tcp-mss

2010-03-22 Thread david.roy
Hi, Just for info. A new PR 514196 has been opened to track this issue. Regards, David David Roy Orange France - RBCI IP Technical Assistance Center Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com -Message d'origine- De : Harry Reynolds

Re: [j-nsp] Verify loss priority for a forwarding class

2010-03-10 Thread david.roy
Hi, You can view drops at the fabric level via the command : show class-of-service fabric statistics David David Roy Orange France - RBCI IP Technical Assistance Center Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com -Message d'origine- De :

[j-nsp] RE : Strange IS-IS Problem

2010-03-07 Thread david.roy
Hi Did you try to check via Tcpdump on your MX, the size of the MX ISIS Hello packet (with the hello padding) ? Regards, David De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] de la part de Derick Winkworth

[j-nsp] BGP tcp-mss

2010-02-02 Thread david.roy
Hi all, Do you why, when I set the tcp-mss to 4096 between to BGP neighbors, this one is well exchange between the TCP Connection Establishment but when I check the mss via the command show system connection extensive I see that the mss used is 2048 (the half). R1 config - lo0 172.20.223.6 :

Re: [j-nsp] Very urgent: Point to multipoint lsp

2009-12-08 Thread david.roy
Hi, Hereafter a simple example of static P2PM with 2 branch Enable mpls and RSVP on your routers. On the head router : protocols { mpls { label-switched-path R1toR2 { from x.x.x.x to y.y.y.y; p2mp MyP2MP; primary path1; }

Re: [j-nsp] RE : VRRP packets neither counted nor logged

2009-11-12 Thread david.roy
Did you try to replace from protocol vrrp by from destination-address 224.0.1.18 ? David David Roy Orange France - RBCI IP Technical Assistance Center Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com -Message d'origine- De :

[j-nsp] RE : VRRP packets neither counted nor logged

2009-11-11 Thread david.roy
Does your vrrp use MD5 authentication. If Yes VRRP uses AH hearder. So ,The IP protocol field is 51. You need to filter to the vrrp multicast destination address : 224.0.1.18 and not to the protocol vrrp Regards, David David Roy Orange France - RBCI IP Technical Assistance Center

Re: [j-nsp] RE : Strange LOGIN_FAILED message

2009-07-22 Thread david.roy
I've only a modem connected to the consol port. Regards, David De : Brandon Bennett [mailto:benn...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 21 juillet 2009 23:30 À : ROY David DTF/DERX Cc : Manu Chao; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

  1   2   >