[j-nsp] JUNIPER-POWER-SUPPLY-UNIT-MIB no such object

Hello,     I have an MX240 running  15.1R6.7. I am looking to monitor a few power supply related items and I observe that juniper has an snmp mib related to power - "JUNIPER-POWER-SUPPLY-UNIT-MIB". It looks to conveniently group all the stuff I care about and so I have tried to poll this mib and

Re: [j-nsp] rate limiting per-user prefix lists

On 1/9/19 7:37 AM, Alexander Arseniev via juniper-nsp wrote: > Hello, > > Well, the prefix-action policers would likely relieve congestion on > Your backhaul MW links but the 100Mbps "last mile" will still be > congested, with a mix of good and bad packets. > > And I would say more bad than good be

[j-nsp] rate limiting per-user prefix lists

Hi,     My platform is Juniper mx240 running 15.1R6.7 and I'm interested in using prefix-action to establish rate limits per user in my network.     DDOS attacks targeting single users on my network can frequently affect many users who happen to share the same backhaul connectivity such as to rur

[j-nsp] essential network rate limiting and ddos mitigation

Hello,     I am very new to juniper, please pardon my ignorance.     I have an MX240, and I have a 10G link to my upstream. I have several other links facing my customers and hosting infrastructure which all run at something decidedly less than 10G. Im interested in implementing some network ra

[j-nsp] More power questions

Hi,     So I want to connect an MX240 and some other gear in a single cabinet at 208V. The group has convinced me this can work in general. I am now trying to find a rack mounted or Zero-U type metered 208V PDU but I am having a hell of a time finding one for this application. The power cord

Re: [j-nsp] 208v power and 110...

On 05/09/2018 10:52 AM, Scott Martin wrote: Almost all equipment these days will run on 208V, in fact, everything I've seen over the last ~10 years will auto switch from 100V - 240V single phase 50/60Hz. (unless 208V is the minimum voltage, of course...) 208V is the way to go, imho. If you h

[j-nsp] 208v power and 110...

Hi. I now have an MX240 router and my god what a beast this is! My system has the 'high line' 208v power supplies and this is my first time dealing with non-110v ac power. I have the two power supplies installed and I am thinking I may want to add a switch to this configuration and to da

[j-nsp] Cost of vMX

Hi,     Since it was mentioned, I have been wondering the cost of going with the software solution vMX as opposed to real hardware. Seems like it should be a lot better right? Mike- ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck

Re: [j-nsp] Going Juniper

On 04/13/2018 02:30 PM, bo...@pobox.com wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, mike+j...@willitsonline.com wrote: > >> Id even like to do cgnat for up to 5000 users but not sure if a >> single box setup would be wise. > > I'm curious why you and other service providers are interested in > CGNAT when IPv4 a

Re: [j-nsp] Going Juniper

On 04/09/2018 08:07 PM, Chris via juniper-nsp wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/04/2018 9:45 AM, mike+j...@willitsonline.com wrote: >> I see there is a terrific amount of used mx104 and mx240 out there >> and the specs all seem great. What I'm looking to do is have 2x 10g >> feeds, route bgp, do flow exp

[j-nsp] Going Juniper

Greetings,     I am looking for some advice concerning juniper as an edge router.     I see there is a terrific amount of used mx104 and mx240 out there and the specs all seem great. What I'm looking to do is have 2x 10g feeds, route bgp, do flow exporting, and do a certain amount of ingress filt

[j-nsp] small service provider j router

Hello, I am a small service provider and today I am largely in the cisco world. I have been feeling robbed over the cost of 10G ports and features like MPLS however and have been eyeing juniper for some time now as a possible answer. Today, the feature set I want is simply bgp full rout

Re: [j-nsp] EX4550 version

Hi, On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:27:23AM +1000, Luca Salvatore wrote: > Just got a couple of new EX4550 switches... current recommended version is > 12.2r2.5 > But I just saw tha the 12.2 train is up release 5.3. > > Just wondering what the rest of you guys are running and if you have any > horr

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 is getting Rebooted Frequently....

hi, On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:48:36AM +0530, Abdullah Al Faruque Mullick wrote: > I don't know whether MX80 boot with only USB.. can't we install the Junos in > inbuilt storage? Can anyone confirm me the same? remove the usb stick, reboot. it will boot from its internal storage. you can insta

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper EX

On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:34:25 -0700, Jonathan Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > Nope, only virtual* present is the virtual-chassis config. oh dear, i made a mistake ;). You are right. I had a look to an ERX instead of an EX. My fault. Best regards, Olaf _

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper EX

On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:38:08 -0700, Jonathan Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > It has this nice error in the config block when you add it... > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show configuration routing-instances what about virtual-routers? IIRC the ERX considers Layer1-Layer2 to the "context" default