Re: [j-nsp] CGN ob MX5?

2012-04-16 Thread magno
Hi Pavel, some corrections inline. Ciao Magno On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Pavel Lunin plu...@senetsy.ru wrote: Hi, Until Juniper realizes MS-MIC (I have no idea when it will happen) MX5–80 boxes really supports no NAT at all. [MAGNO] Not dynamic NAT (or PBA), just static 1:1 nat

Re: [j-nsp] CGN ob MX5?

2012-04-15 Thread Xu Hu
Many thanks for your information. Thanks and regards, Xu Hu On 13 Apr, 2012, at 21:52, Bill Blackford bblackf...@gmail.com wrote: This might also help. http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/implementation-guides/8010076-en.pdf When testing CGN, there are some general things to keep in

Re: [j-nsp] CGN ob MX5?

2012-04-14 Thread Pavel Lunin
Hi, Until Juniper realizes MS-MIC (I have no idea when it will happen) MX5–80 boxes really supports no NAT at all. What they call Inline NAT on Trio (recently realized) is by now… umm… sort of a patch for a particular customer or something like. It only supports 1:1 bidirectional static mapping,

Re: [j-nsp] CGN ob MX5?

2012-04-13 Thread Xu Hu
Recently heard so many times about CGN, but i still don't understand what is the difference between NAT and CGN, can any expert explain what's the CGN. 2012/4/12 Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi On (2012-04-12 16:31 +0200), Matthias Brumm wrote: I would like to know, if no, some or all implementations

Re: [j-nsp] CGN ob MX5?

2012-04-13 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2012-04-13 15:20 +0800), Xu Hu wrote: Recently heard so many times about CGN, but i still don't understand what is the difference between NAT and CGN, can any expert explain what's the CGN. That is good question :). I think it's just marketing for doing NAT in very high scale, regardless

Re: [j-nsp] CGN ob MX5?

2012-04-13 Thread Alex Arseniev
...@gmail.com To: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 8:20 AM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] CGN ob MX5? Recently heard so many times about CGN, but i still don't understand what is the difference between NAT and CGN, can any expert explain what's the CGN. 2012/4/12

Re: [j-nsp] CGN ob MX5?

2012-04-13 Thread Matthias Brumm
jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com To: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 8:20 AM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] CGN ob MX5? Recently heard so many times about CGN, but i still don't understand what is the difference between NAT and CGN, can any expert explain

Re: [j-nsp] CGN ob MX5?

2012-04-13 Thread Bill Blackford
This might also help. http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/implementation-guides/8010076-en.pdf When testing CGN, there are some general things to keep in mind: 1. Application/Functionality. How do standard applications function behind the double-nat? 2. Performance and scale. What's the

[j-nsp] CGN ob MX5?

2012-04-12 Thread Matthias Brumm
Hi! I would like to know, if no, some or all implementations of CGN will be working on a MX5? Regards, Matthias ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] CGN ob MX5?

2012-04-12 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2012-04-12 16:31 +0200), Matthias Brumm wrote: I would like to know, if no, some or all implementations of CGN will be working on a MX5? This seems in realms of possibility (1ipv6 statically to 1ipv4) for trio. But if you know you will need CGN I would assume that MX5 will never get it,