Hi Pavel, some corrections inline.
Ciao
Magno
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Pavel Lunin plu...@senetsy.ru wrote:
Hi,
Until Juniper realizes MS-MIC (I have no idea when it will happen) MX5–80
boxes really supports no NAT at all.
[MAGNO] Not dynamic NAT (or PBA), just static 1:1 nat
Many thanks for your information.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 13 Apr, 2012, at 21:52, Bill Blackford bblackf...@gmail.com wrote:
This might also help.
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/implementation-guides/8010076-en.pdf
When testing CGN, there are some general things to keep in
Hi,
Until Juniper realizes MS-MIC (I have no idea when it will happen) MX5–80
boxes really supports no NAT at all.
What they call Inline NAT on Trio (recently realized) is by now… umm… sort
of a patch for a particular customer or something like. It only supports
1:1 bidirectional static mapping,
Recently heard so many times about CGN, but i still don't understand what
is the difference between NAT and CGN, can any expert explain what's the
CGN.
2012/4/12 Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi
On (2012-04-12 16:31 +0200), Matthias Brumm wrote:
I would like to know, if no, some or all implementations
On (2012-04-13 15:20 +0800), Xu Hu wrote:
Recently heard so many times about CGN, but i still don't understand what
is the difference between NAT and CGN, can any expert explain what's the
CGN.
That is good question :). I think it's just marketing for doing NAT in very
high scale, regardless
...@gmail.com
To: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] CGN ob MX5?
Recently heard so many times about CGN, but i still don't understand what
is the difference between NAT and CGN, can any expert explain what's the
CGN.
2012/4/12
jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com
To: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] CGN ob MX5?
Recently heard so many times about CGN, but i still don't understand what
is the difference between NAT and CGN, can any expert explain
This might also help.
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/implementation-guides/8010076-en.pdf
When testing CGN, there are some general things to keep in mind:
1. Application/Functionality. How do standard applications function
behind the double-nat?
2. Performance and scale. What's the
Hi!
I would like to know, if no, some or all implementations of CGN will
be working on a MX5?
Regards,
Matthias
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
On (2012-04-12 16:31 +0200), Matthias Brumm wrote:
I would like to know, if no, some or all implementations of CGN will
be working on a MX5?
This seems in realms of possibility (1ipv6 statically to 1ipv4) for trio.
But if you know you will need CGN I would assume that MX5 will never get
it,
10 matches
Mail list logo