Re: [j-nsp] Correct config for SRX port channel - Cisco

2013-07-26 Thread Phil Mayers
On 25/07/13 20:16, OBrien, Will wrote: Here's a full working example that I pulled off my production link. It's comprised of a pair of 10gb links. I renumbered things to Presumably you either don't have vlan dot1q tag native enabled, or it's on a platform/version which doesn't (erroneously)

Re: [j-nsp] Correct config for SRX port channel - Cisco

2013-07-25 Thread Phil Mayers
On 24/07/13 17:11, Phil Mayers wrote: On 24/07/13 17:01, Olivier Benghozi wrote: Hi Phil, what is the Cisco model IOS? It's actually an Nexus 7009 running NX-OS. Did you create the vlan in the vlan database in your Cisco switch? :) Yep Maybe try switchport nonegotiate... No such

Re: [j-nsp] Correct config for SRX port channel - Cisco

2013-07-25 Thread OBrien, Will
Here's a full working example that I pulled off my production link. It's comprised of a pair of 10gb links. I renumbered things to protect the guilty. Useful bits here are adjustments to MTU counting style to make ospf work with jumbo frames. interface port-channel5 description

[j-nsp] Correct config for SRX port channel - Cisco

2013-07-24 Thread Phil Mayers
If I have a single SRX3600 device (NOT a cluster), what config (if any...) can I use to match a config on the Cisco side: int member lacp rate fast channel-group 20 mode active int Po20 switchport switchport mode trunk switchport trunk allowed vlan 999 int Vlan999 ip address

Re: [j-nsp] Correct config for SRX port channel - Cisco

2013-07-24 Thread Phil Mayers
On 24/07/13 15:48, Stacy W. Smith wrote: In general, I see no problems with your AE configuration. Could you define never comes up? Is it the ae0 interface, or the ae0.999 unit that is in a down state? Both (see below) The output of show interfaces terse (at least for the member and ae

Re: [j-nsp] Correct config for SRX port channel - Cisco

2013-07-24 Thread Stacy W. Smith
In general, I see no problems with your AE configuration. Could you define never comes up? Is it the ae0 interface, or the ae0.999 unit that is in a down state? The output of show interfaces terse (at least for the member and ae interfaces) and the output of show lacp interfaces might be

Re: [j-nsp] Correct config for SRX port channel - Cisco

2013-07-24 Thread Phil Mayers
On 24/07/13 16:07, Phil Mayers wrote: On 24/07/13 15:48, Stacy W. Smith wrote: In general, I see no problems with your AE configuration. Could you define never comes up? Is it the ae0 interface, or the ae0.999 unit that is in a down state? Both (see below) Interestingly, this comes up if

Re: [j-nsp] Correct config for SRX port channel - Cisco

2013-07-24 Thread Olivier Benghozi
Hi Phil, what is the Cisco model IOS? Did you create the vlan in the vlan database in your Cisco switch? :) Maybe try switchport nonegotiate... Le 24 juil. 2013 à 17:39, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk a écrit : On 24/07/13 16:07, Phil Mayers wrote: On 24/07/13 15:48, Stacy W. Smith

Re: [j-nsp] Correct config for SRX port channel - Cisco

2013-07-24 Thread Phil Mayers
On 24/07/13 17:01, Olivier Benghozi wrote: Hi Phil, what is the Cisco model IOS? It's actually an Nexus 7009 running NX-OS. Did you create the vlan in the vlan database in your Cisco switch? :) Yep Maybe try switchport nonegotiate... No such command on NX-OS, there's no DTP.