Much better to spend more $$$ in 9200 because it scales to 40G and
100G and because it uses a king if TRIO ASIC (other name and limited
FIB/RIB only) ... and it is prepared to SDN ... integrated to QFX5100
... so on ...
Giuliano Cardozo Medalha
Systems Engineer
+55 (17) 3011-3811
+55 (17) 8112-5394
Hi
As I would like to buy bunch of EX8200 + XRE I have question will EX8200 go
EoS or EoL in near time as it looks that EX9200 is good successor of this
platform.
Can anyone comment is good choice to still go for EX8200 or maybe better
spend few more $$$ for EX9200 ?
Rob
_
Yes you need at least one xre. I suggest you read juniper documentation on
the 8200 VC.
Morgan
On Thursday, August 15, 2013, Robert Hass wrote:
> Do I need 2x XRE to have Virtual-Chassis of EX8200 or I can do this without
> XRE ?
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Morgan McLean
>
Do I need 2x XRE to have Virtual-Chassis of EX8200 or I can do this without
XRE ?
Rob
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Morgan McLean wrote:
> The 8200 vc stability is the best out of the EX lineup in my testing. I
> can't make it fall over, where as I can find corner cases that will crash
> 3
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Robert Hass wrote:
How Virtual-Chassis on Juniper EX8200 is different than Catalyst 6500
(Sup2T) VSS ?
If you haven't already purchased ex8200s, talk to your juniper rep
regarding the lifespan of the box and the linecard roadmap.
The ex9200 appears to be the future in
The 8200 vc stability is the best out of the EX lineup in my testing. I
can't make it fall over, where as I can find corner cases that will crash
3300s etc.
Just keep in mind the VC connections will only work with certain line cards
afaik. And I thought two RE's were required for dual xre use but
The EX8200 Virtual-Chassis w/ a couple of the XRE200's does well. The
XRE's act as the control plane and the 8200's end up just being
linecards. It's a bit hack-ish IMHO w/ a EX2200 switch acting as the
glue between each XRE and the 8200.
We've run 11.2 - 11.4 and pleased w/ the stability. Our
How Virtual-Chassis on Juniper EX8200 is different than Catalyst 6500
(Sup2T) VSS ?
Are both have shared control-plane ?
How about stability of Virtual-Chassis and VSS on latest software releases ?
I would like to implement core layer using EX8200 or Cat6500 (two core
switches).
Each core dev
even so MX is an edge router. not a high density campus switch.
ask from Juniper person for a guaranteed roadmap for the EX8200 and
you will be surprised i think (or maybe not ;).
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.net
Has anyone heard that the rumor that the EX8200 platform is going to be
announced to be end of life soon, replaced by the MX with lower end cards
or perhaps heavier discounting?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.
I don't know...I have citrix devices, MX80's, SRX650's, SRX3600's,
EX3200's, etc in the same cabinet. The only devices with power supply
problems are the EX8208's.
I can try to investigate upstream, not sure how much info I'll get. Its
Equinix SV4 in sunnyvale, so its a fairly decent facility. Nic
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Morgan McLean wrote:
> Hi everyone...
>
> I have a troubling problem. We run a couple EX8208's, and have a mix of
> 1200, 2000 and 3000w PSU's in use. So far within the past ~60 days, we have
> had 2 out of a total of 12 PSU's running have a failure. Unfortunatel
Hi everyone...
I have a troubling problem. We run a couple EX8208's, and have a mix of
1200, 2000 and 3000w PSU's in use. So far within the past ~60 days, we have
had 2 out of a total of 12 PSU's running have a failure. Unfortunately,
thats not the problem.
The problem is, when these PSUs die, th
Hi all,
I'm seeing these messages spewing from one of our ex8208s --
(FPC Slot 0) chas[85]: %DAEMON-3: sntl_f_check_dest_errors: Fabric
request time out for plane 2 dest 1 pfe 1
(FPC Slot 0) chas[85]: %DAEMON-3: sntl_f_check_dest_errors: Fabric
request time out for plane 2 dest 4 pfe 1
(FPC Slot
Looking to hear any war stories people have (good or bad) with the
EX8200 platform. Planning to evaluate it for dense 1G L2 aggregation,
and wanted to see if there were any big warning signs to watch out
for.
- Darrell
___
juniper-nsp mailing list junipe
Hey Felix,
You can buy racks with panels that guide the right-to-left airflow
from front-to-back:
http://www.chatsworth.com/uploadedFiles/Files/N-SERIES_JUNIPERSWTCH_APPLIC.pdf
-Eddie
On Oct 2, 2009, at 12:39 AM, Felix Schueren wrote:
Quoc Hoang wrote:
What cabinets do you have the sw
Quoc Hoang wrote:
> What cabinets do you have the switch installed in? The 19' or 24'
> cabinets? Since it's side to side cooling, I'm afraid the cold hot
> aisle layout in a typical datacenter may pose an issue.
600x1200mm racks, hot/cold aisle, yes, it's problematic. Totally
braindead decision by
Thanks for the info.
Re power, the EX8216 supports the 3000W AC 220V high density PSU for a 3+3
configuration for PDU A/B power redundancy
quoc
--- On Thu, 10/1/09, Chris Evans wrote:
> From: Chris Evans
> Subject: [j-nsp] EX8200
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Date: Thursda
Quoc:
"I'm considering purchasing the big iron EX8216 chassis for our core
switching. These switches are pretty brand new to the market. Anyone running
these and care to share their operational experience/feedback/issues seen so
far?
thanks,
quoc"
We have two of the 8216's in our lab as part of
Quoc,
> Hi,
> I'm considering purchasing the big iron EX8216 chassis for our core
> switching. These switches are pretty brand new to the market. Anyone
> running these and care to share their operational
> experience/feedback/issues seen so far?
>
I can only comment on the EX8208 - running okayi
Hi,
I'm considering purchasing the big iron EX8216 chassis for our core
switching. These switches are pretty brand new to the market. Anyone running
these and care to share their operational experience/feedback/issues seen so
far?
thanks,
quoc
___
21 matches
Mail list logo
