On 25/Jul/15 16:54, Colton Conor wrote:
> So how redundant an reliable would a MX480 be with two RE-2000's, 2
> SCB's, and 4 AC power supplies?
Extremely.
Mark.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/l
Le 25/07/15 16:54, Colton Conor a écrit :
So how redundant an reliable would a MX480 be with two RE-2000's, 2 SCB's,
and 4 AC power supplies? I know in the ideal world there would be two of
these, but due to budget that is not an option. What have you seen fail on
MX480's?
I think this is go
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015, Colton Conor wrote:
So how redundant an reliable would a MX480 be with two RE-2000's, 2 SCB's,
and 4 AC power supplies? I know in the ideal world there would be two of
these, but due to budget that is not an option. What have you seen fail on
MX480's?
At $dayjob, we replac
So how redundant an reliable would a MX480 be with two RE-2000's, 2 SCB's,
and 4 AC power supplies? I know in the ideal world there would be two of
these, but due to budget that is not an option. What have you seen fail on
MX480's?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 22/
On 22/Jul/15 17:01, Bill Blackford wrote:
> I'm referencing my experience from a few years back. Thank you for the
> clarification.
Nonetheless, I'd suggest looking into possible software limitations in
current code in mixed environments. The last thing you need is a feature
not working or dow
I'm referencing my experience from a few years back. Thank you for the
clarification.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 07:51, Damien DeVille wrote:
>
> You absolutely can mix MPCs and DPCs in the same chassis. When the MPCs
> first came out there were compatibility issues, but with
Are you sure you can not mix and match DPC with MPC? I know it was not
recommended back in the day, but from what I have read its fine now. But I
have not seen either of these stated in an official Juniper document. Can
you mix and match or not?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Bill Blackford
wr
You absolutely can mix MPCs and DPCs in the same chassis. When the MPCs
first came out there were compatibility issues, but with modern Junos
versions (11.4 and on) those are history.
- Damien
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Bill Blackford
wrote:
> I agree that this is a good build for what
I agree that this is a good build for what you've stated. I would definitely
recommend an MS-DPC for off-loading any sampling or crypto.
You mention higher density with the use of MICs in the future. This would
require taking the plunge to MPC and a replacement of your DPCs (you cannot mix
DPC
On 22/Jul/15 16:04, Jerry Jones wrote:
> MPX support inline flow on Trio. Not as flexible but possible.
You mean MPC?
But the OP is getting DPC's, so he is either relegated to RE-based NDE,
or offload that to the MS-DPC.
Mark.
___
juniper-nsp mailing
MPX support inline flow on Trio. Not as flexible but possible.
On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
We would be getting redundant (2) RE-2000's with redundant (2) standard
SCB's.
The configuration would be full BGP tables with 4 providers on 10G ports.
The MS-DCP is a requirement f
correct.
On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
Eventhough the RE-2000 is going into EOL status, it is still faster and has
more memory than the RE's in the MX80 or MX104 right?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Jerry Jones wrote:
The RE-2000 and SCB have been announced EOL for next
Le 22/07/15 15:51, Colton Conor a écrit :
We would be getting redundant (2) RE-2000's with redundant (2) standard
SCB's.
The configuration would be full BGP tables with 4 providers on 10G ports.
The MS-DCP is a requirement for JFLOW on these older cards right? We would
also use the MS-DCP for
Eventhough the RE-2000 is going into EOL status, it is still faster and has
more memory than the RE's in the MX80 or MX104 right?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Jerry Jones wrote:
> The RE-2000 and SCB have been announced EOL for next year.
>
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
We would be getting redundant (2) RE-2000's with redundant (2) standard
SCB's.
The configuration would be full BGP tables with 4 providers on 10G ports.
The MS-DCP is a requirement for JFLOW on these older cards right? We would
also use the MS-DCP for IPSec tunnels to Cisco ASAs. Any issues with
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Jerry Jones<mailto:jjo...@danrj.com>
Sent: 7/22/2015 8:38 AM
To: Colton Conor<mailto:colton.co...@gmail.com>
Cc: Juniper List<mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX480 Build
The RE-2000
You didn't specify which REs you'd get with it. Make sure you are getting a
pair. (Even though the 960 uses three SCBs, you can only use two REs in
that chassis as well.)
The R blades are pretty solid, but you didn't specify any sort of config
requirements.
What will you be using the MSDPC for? (La
The RE-2000 and SCB have been announced EOL for next year.
On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
I am considering buying a used MX480. It will have the following:
1x MX480-PREMIUM-AC - MX480 Base system with redundant RE-2000, SCB, and AC
power
2x DPCE-R-4XGE-XFP - 4x10GE Enhance
On 22/Jul/15 15:24, Colton Conor wrote:
>
>
>
> Besides the chassis size and power consumption anything we should know or
> consider deciding between a MX 240, MX480, and MX960? It seems the MX240 is
> too small for our needs, so its really the MX480 vs MX960.
You take a bigger hit on the MX960
On 22/Jul/15 15:24, Colton Conor wrote:
>
>
>
> Besides the chassis size and power consumption anything we should know or
> consider deciding between a MX 240, MX480, and MX960? It seems the MX240 is
> too small for our needs, so its really the MX480 vs MX960.
You take a bigger on the MX960 with
I am considering buying a used MX480. It will have the following:
1x MX480-PREMIUM-AC - MX480 Base system with redundant RE-2000, SCB, and AC
power
2x DPCE-R-4XGE-XFP - 4x10GE Enhanced DPC for MX, requires optics sold
separately
1 x Juniper MS-DPC - IP services line card for MX Series Requi
21 matches
Mail list logo
