Re: [j-nsp] MPLS LDP router-id

2015-08-23 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Hi all I have changed the setup to focus only on the xconnect between Cisco and Juniper The topology is simple : CE1 - Cisco PE - Junos PE - CE2 Please find the outputs R1#sh mpls ldp neighbor Peer LDP Ident: 20.20.20.20:0; Local LDP Ident 212.118.1.1:0 TCP connection: 20.20.20.20.646

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS LDP router-id

2015-08-11 Thread Mohammad Khalil
We have customer at both ends that need to establish L2VPN BR, Mohammad On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Craig Whitmore wrote: > > According to what I know , the router can only have one LDP router-id > > > I have one of my PEs (Cisco) configured with a private IP address > (loopback > > 0) and

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS LDP router-id

2015-08-10 Thread James Bensley
Hi Mohammad, I think you are looking for the following commands on your Cisco device (if I have understood the problem correctly), IOS: interface x/y/z mpls ldp discovery transport-address interface IOS-XR: mpls ldp vrf ABC123 interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/1 address-family ipv4 disco

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS LDP router-id

2015-08-06 Thread Guy Lowe
Mohammad is probably referring to BGP router-id, rather than LDP router-id. On 07/08/15 10:39, Craig Whitmore wrote: >> According to what I know , the router can only have one LDP router-id > >> I have one of my PEs (Cisco) configured with a private IP address > (loopback >> 0) and is configured

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS LDP router-id

2015-08-06 Thread Craig Whitmore
> According to what I know , the router can only have one LDP router-id > I have one of my PEs (Cisco) configured with a private IP address (loopback > 0) and is configured as MPLS LDP router-id Any reason you need to run LDP with your upstream Provider?

[j-nsp] MPLS LDP router-id

2015-08-06 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Hi all I have a cisco/juniper case According to what I know , the router can only have one LDP router-id I have one of my PEs (Cisco) configured with a private IP address (loopback 0) and is configured as MPLS LDP router-id I have a new connection with an uplink provider with Juniper being his t

Re: [j-nsp] Mpls Ldp

2009-01-30 Thread Masood Ahmad Shah
-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of SunnyDay Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 2:45 PM To: juniper-Nsp Subject: [j-nsp] Mpls Ldp Hello i have some issues between a cisco router and a E320 concerning mpls ldp i was wondering if any one knows what are the default modes for cisco for: Label

[j-nsp] Mpls Ldp

2009-01-23 Thread SunnyDay
Hello i have some issues between a cisco router and a E320 concerning mpls ldp i was wondering if any one knows what are the default modes for cisco for: Label distribution control mode Label retention mode Label advertisement mode Thank you ___ junip

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS LDP

2008-06-03 Thread Stefan Fouant
I'd have to see your config to give you a definitive answer but you might want to try enabling 'traffic-engineering bgp-igp' under [protocols mpls]. This will cause all your inet.3 routes to be moved into inet.0 and allow your IGPs (as well as BGP) to use the LSPs for forwarding traffic. HTHs. S

[j-nsp] MPLS LDP

2008-06-03 Thread sunnyday
Hello I have configured mpls ldp in my network and I want all ip traffic to go through mpls. I have issued the command mpls ldp ip-forwarding but the traffic seems to go through isis when I trace route to an ip I see no label assignment. After that I have issued the mpls ldp ip-forwarding hosts-