Hi Stevanus,
i cannot use " ip multipath round robin " for ADSL(PPPoE) interfaces
(interface gigabitEthernet 11/0.622.xxx),
Any ERX Radius attribute can do this ?
interface gigabitEthernet 11/0.622
!
vlan id 622
ip multipath round-robin
pppoe
pppoe auto-configure
pppoe profile any "ABCD_pp
I think you can use *ip multipath round robin* command. Explanation below :
*Configuring Equal-Cost Multipath Load Sharing
*
Equal-cost multipath (ECMP) sets are formed when the system finds
routing table entries for the same destination with equal cost. You can
add routing table entries manual
Hi All,
Does juniper ERX support per packet load balancing ?
Is there a way to force this behavior?
Thanks
gdxnfx
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Hi Arda
thanks for your response - I suspected this might be the case. I'll give
mlppp a go to see if that meets the requirement.
And that's bad about the ospf interfaces!
Regards,
Dave
Arda Balkanay wrote:
I have a case about that issue (Case #2008-0703-0196 ) and Juniper
said that:
-roun
I have a case about that issue (Case #2008-0703-0196 ) and Juniper said
that:
-round robin load sharing isn't supported for dynamic interfaces; alternate
solution can be to use MLPPP
for my case MLPPP is not possible because the incumbent who owns LAC does
not permit it.
Also for dynamic subscrib
Hi All
Has anyone ever tried to do change the load balancing technique over
l2tp tunnels on an ERX?
the default is obviously per-flow:
sh ip interface tun l2tp:139254/1105340/1016347 | i Multipath
Multipath mode = hashed
It seems enabling per-packet on the physical interface over which the
l2
On a similar note, does anybody know if Junipers will be any good at
load balancing multiple GRE tunnels between two devices?
--
Leigh
David Ball wrote:
> The following URL may help to explain:
>
> http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Load_Balancing
>
> as would the official JUNOS doc on
The following URL may help to explain:
http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Load_Balancing
as would the official JUNOS doc on the matter:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos84/swconfig84-routing/id-10480125.html
As for workarounds, sounds like getting the Internet Proces
On Thursday 20 September 2007 17:18, Nick Kraal wrote:
> Dear all,
Hello.
> As I understand it, Juniper routers do not support per
> packet load balancing on multiple interfaces similar to
> Cisco, and only in a per flow fashion.
>
> Is there is any workaround for this?
AFAIK, load balancing on
Dear all,
As I understand it, Juniper routers do not support per packet load
balancing on multiple interfaces similar to Cisco, and only in a per
flow fashion.
Is there is any workaround for this?
Regards,
-nick/
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper
10 matches
Mail list logo
