Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Farhan Jaffer
> > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:59 PM
> > To: Iftikhar Ahmed
> > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Unequal-Cost Load Balancing for
ich will
> result
> in wasted bandwidth at best and a bottleneck at worst.
>
> Regards,
> Masood
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Farhan Jaffer
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:59 PM
>
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Unequal-Cost Load Balancing for OSPF
No. And it's not Juniper, It is OSPF which does not support unequal cost
load balancing.
EIGRP supports this behavior by variance factor.
If EIGRP is open atandard (not Cisco proprietry) then Juniper w
No. And it's not Juniper, It is OSPF which does not support unequal cost
load balancing.
EIGRP supports this behavior by variance factor.
If EIGRP is open atandard (not Cisco proprietry) then Juniper will also
support the same feature for EIGRP.
However you can use some tricks to justify your sc
Hi,
Does Juniper support Unequal-Cost Load Balancing for OSPF, like the way
cisco do for EIGRP with commands like variance & maximum-paths etc stuff?
Regards
Iftikhar Ahmed
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether
5 matches
Mail list logo