PM, Joe Stein wrote:
> I have not tried the KAFKA-139 ticket yet for latest scala but will give
> that a try this week. Looks cool.
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Derek Chen-Becker
> wrote:
>
> > In particular it breaks some tests between Scala 2.8.0 and 2.9.x due to
&
n't be better off just writing simple hand-made
> mocks for major classes or increasing the quality of our test harnesses to
> do integration testing...?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Jay
>
--
*Derek Chen-Becker*
*Precog Lead Infrastructure Engineer*
de...@precog.com
303-752-1700
Hi,
This has been somewhat of a complicated patch to submit :). Besides the
obvious application of the patch file itself, you'll need to downoad the
latest SBT jar and replace the existing one in lib/, and you'll also need
to remove the project/plugins/ dir. "Patch", per se, doesn't support eit
s you
>> mention are significant enough then maybe we should stay on svn?
>
> I think the caveats are of the "things *could* go wrong" variety, but
> that current git users are happy and have not had recent problems. I
> admit there isn't a good way to quantify that.
I've put together an preliminary patch (attached) against kafka to build using SBT 0.11.3 with a cross build against 2.8.0/2.9.x. This is based on the existing SBT 0.7 build and I think I translated everything, but it's easy to fix anything I've missed/mis-translated. A few sticking points for disc
968 06-29-12 17:21 libs/snappy-java-1.0.4.1.jar
---
9542795 8 files
Is it just me that this isn't working for? I'm building from commit
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/kafka/trunk@1352145 (via Git)
Thanks,
Derek
--
De
a change to the EasyMock matcher to ignore order for the
argument? Or would it be preferable to do a stable sort (perhaps change collate
to return a List[(String,Int), Seq[T]])?
Thanks,
Derek
--
Derek Chen-Becker
Lead Infrastructure Engineer
de...@precog.com
303-752-1700
