https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry Kazakov ---
I'm looking into this bugs now. Firstly, about the blending mode. Krita follows
these rules:
1) If merged layers have **the same** blending mode, then layers are merged
together using "Normal" blending mode, and t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #10 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
The most intuitive way of thinking about the result is the "what you see is
what you get" approach in my opinion. In the most obvious cases at least.
While it is indeed unclear what you should get when dif
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry Kazakov ---
Hi, katearcher89!
The information is not destroyed. That is how the adjustment layers work. They
**copy** the result of the entire projection beneath them into their point of
layer stack. If we implement what you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #12 from Dmitry Kazakov ---
Git commit 59d8e62207acf10afca0158e377c1775c18eb857 by Dmitry Kazakov.
Committed on 20/09/2019 at 14:00.
Pushed by dkazakov into branch 'master'.
Add a comment about merging adjustment layers
Krita sticks to "ke
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
Dmitry Kazakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INTENTIONAL
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
katearche...@yandex.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INTENTIONAL |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
wolthera changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
katearche...@yandex.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #17 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
Created attachment 122765
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=122765&action=edit
merge within a group test
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #18 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
woops, it seems I've posted at the same time as wolthera overriding the status,
sorry for that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #19 from wolthera ---
I have the feeling this could be solved by you not using the copy blending
mode? Because that is what causes this distinct merging behaviour.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
Raghavendra kamath changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ra...@raghukamath.com
--- Comment #20 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #21 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
(In reply to wolthera from comment #19)
> I have the feeling this could be solved by you not using the copy blending
> mode? Because that is what causes this distinct merging behaviour.
The copy mode is as
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
Raghavendra kamath changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #24 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
(In reply to Raghavendra kamath from comment #22)
> Hi Kate,
>
> May I request you to answer to the questions in comment 20 ?
>
> thank you
I was in the process of writing it :)
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #23 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
(In reply to Raghavendra kamath from comment #20)
> @ Kate the filter masks are designed to affect everything beneath them, when
> you merge it , it creates a layer similar to what "new layer from visible"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #25 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
(In reply to katearcher89 from comment #23)
>
> https://imgur.com/a/0GjXguZ
>
> In photoshop there were the same steps: create a filter layer(an adjustment
> layer in a adobe world), select two layers(an
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
Raghavendra kamath changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOT A BUG |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #27 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
(In reply to Raghavendra kamath from comment #26)
> Hi Kate,
>
> Thank you very much for the images, that makes it clear to understand what
> you want.
>
> From what I understand you want the filter to on
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
Raghavendra kamath changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #29 from Dmitry Kazakov ---
Git commit ad7e606e1374555a03bb546ecb425076d5acc9fc by Dmitry Kazakov.
Committed on 21/09/2019 at 10:07.
Pushed by dkazakov into branch 'krita/4.2'.
Add a comment about merging adjustment layers
Krita sticks to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #1 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
Created attachment 115191
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=115191&action=edit
an example file to demonstrate the issue
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
b...@fastmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@fastmail.com
Status|REPORTE
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #4 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
(In reply to bugs from comment #2)
> krita-4.2.0-pre-alpha-127857b-x86_64.appimage
>
> confirming
>
> However, this seems intentional, or at least a side effect of how filter
> layers work.
> ...
> this ca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #3 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
Created attachment 115202
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=115202&action=edit
filter layer with transparency mask merge
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #5 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
(In reply to katearcher89 from comment #4)
> (In reply to bugs from comment #2)
> > krita-4.2.0-pre-alpha-127857b-x86_64.appimage
> >
> > confirming
> >
> > However, this seems intentional, or at least a s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #6 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
(In reply to katearcher89 from comment #5)
>
> I stand corrected: I've tried merging paint layers in different modes and by
> now, in 4.1.1 when merging any blend mode set to any higher level is
> discarded
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #7 from b...@fastmail.com ---
(In reply to katearcher89 from comment #6)
> (In reply to katearcher89 from comment #5)
> >
> > I stand corrected: I've tried merging paint layers in different modes and by
> > now, in 4.1.1 when merging any ble
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
--- Comment #8 from katearche...@yandex.ru ---
(In reply to bugs from comment #7)
>
> Regarding blending modes, if memory serves, this is how Photoshop behaves.
> It might not make both layers Normal, but it has to decide between one or
> the other. It
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398990
Boudewijn Rempt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@valdyas.org
Assignee|krita-bug
30 matches
Mail list logo
