Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 20 September 2016 at 22:54, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > Certainly not. AGPL is like GPL in that sense, with the extra rule >> that you must publish the source code even if you're only giving >> access over the network and not distributing binaries. >> >>

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
Certainly not. AGPL is like GPL in that sense, with the extra rule that you must publish the source code even if you're only giving access over the network and not distributing binaries. I don't think an AGPL library makes much sense though. ​ALGPL makes sense then :) ​ On

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 20 September 2016 at 22:00, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > 2016-09-20 16:53 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek : > > > > > > On 20 September 2016 at 21:42, Nicolás Alvarez < > nicolas.alva...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> 2016-09-20 16:30 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
2016-09-20 16:53 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek : > > > On 20 September 2016 at 21:42, Nicolás Alvarez > wrote: >> >> 2016-09-20 16:30 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek : >> > >> > >> > On 20 September 2016 at 21:19, Thomas Pfeiffer

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
2016-09-20 16:30 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek : > > > On 20 September 2016 at 21:19, Thomas Pfeiffer > wrote: >> >> On 20.09.2016 19:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: >>> >>> 2016-09-20 14:04 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Riddell : Added:

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 20 September 2016 at 21:19, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On 20.09.2016 19:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > >> 2016-09-20 14:04 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Riddell : >> >>> Added: >>> ''Applications which are intended to be run on a server'' can be >>> licenced under

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On 20.09.2016 19:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: 2016-09-20 14:04 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Riddell : Added: ''Applications which are intended to be run on a server'' can be licenced under the GNU AGPL 3.0 or later Rationale: KDE Store code is under AGPL Question: should this be an

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 20 September 2016 at 20:42, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2016-09-20, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > Differences: > > Removed > > "code may not be copied from Qt into KDE Platform as Qt is LGPL 2.1" > > Rationale: Qt is now LGPL 3 as well as 2 > > Qt is not

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2016-09-20, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Differences: > Removed > "code may not be copied from Qt into KDE Platform as Qt is LGPL 2.1" > Rationale: Qt is now LGPL 3 as well as 2 Qt is not LGPL2.1 in general. As long as we want to be LGPL2.1 compat, we can't copy code from Qt.

KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Jonathan Riddell
It's time for a new updates to the KDE Licensing Policy The purpose of the policy is to ensure a common understanding of what KDE code and contributions can be licenced as for copying. It should allow maximum reusability amongst KDE and other free software groups while ensuring people are

Re: Creating a map of KDE contributors?

2016-09-20 Thread Antonio Larrosa
I also remembered it, but I didn't remember the location of the map. It's even in the internet archive: https://web.archive. org/web/20020402050748/http://worldwide.kde.org/map/ 2016-09-20 14:11 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Kügler : > On dinsdag 20 september 2016 11:49:43 CEST Jonathan

Re: Creating a map of KDE contributors?

2016-09-20 Thread Burkhard Lück
Am Dienstag, 20. September 2016, 11:49:43 CEST schrieb Jonathan Riddell: > Gnome already do this > https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeWorldWide > > and I have vauge memories of KDE doing it in the past too, or maybe I dreamt > that >

Re: Creating a map of KDE contributors?

2016-09-20 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On dinsdag 20 september 2016 11:49:43 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Gnome already do this > https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeWorldWide > > and I have vauge memories of KDE doing it in the past too, or maybe I dreamt > that You didn't dream that: https://dot.kde.org/2002/03/16/kde-worldwide-goes-live

Re: Creating a map of KDE contributors?

2016-09-20 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 13:42:35 CEST Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > Hi everyone, > I recently realized that unless you ask fellow KDE contributors personally > where they live, you don't really know where over the world (or even in > your home country) KDE is spread. > > [...] > > So, two

Re: Creating a map of KDE contributors?

2016-09-20 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On 20.09.2016 13:49, Jonathan Riddell wrote: Gnome already do this https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeWorldWide Nice! Though a zoomable map would be nicer, because on that map it's a bit difficult to distinguish cities in more crowded countries.

Re: Creating a map of KDE contributors?

2016-09-20 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Gnome already do this https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeWorldWide and I have vauge memories of KDE doing it in the past too, or maybe I dreamt that Jonathan

Creating a map of KDE contributors?

2016-09-20 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
Hi everyone, I recently realized that unless you ask fellow KDE contributors personally where they live, you don't really know where over the world (or even in your home country) KDE is spread. I think this is a pity, given that knowing that would allow us to, among other things - show the

Mentoring, student programs coming up

2016-09-20 Thread Valorie Zimmerman
Hi folks, I have no announcements, but was thinking about our Season of KDE and how we can enlarge and improve it. I believe we've been thinking of it too much like GSoC, when it can be so much more. For instance, I've seen a few announcements from maintainers wanting to step back from a large