Christoph Cullmann wrote:
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
As the manpower is limited and we sometimes not even keep up with the
incoming new bugs, might it be a good idea to adopt a similar strategy
like the Qt
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 14:05:09 CEST, laurent Montel wrote:
Especially for KDE PIM, given the size of the userbase and the amount of
developers (3), bugs often take more than a year to get to and
to be fixed.
+1
As Daniel wrote we have a lot of bug and a very small team.
So we can't able
On Friday, July 31, 2015 04:01:37 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 14:05:09 CEST, laurent Montel wrote:
Especially for KDE PIM, given the size of the userbase and the amount of
developers (3), bugs often take more than a year to get to and
to be fixed.
+1
As
El Dilluns, 18 de maig de 2015, a les 13:38:36, Albert Astals Cid va escriure:
El Dilluns, 18 de maig de 2015, a les 08:00:07, Martin Koller va escriure:
On Sunday 10 May 2015 19:39:07 Alex Merry wrote:
On Saturday 09 May 2015 22:54:49 Martin Koller wrote:
I'm working on porting
On Friday 31 July 2015 12:00:22 Allen Winter wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 04:01:37 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 14:05:09 CEST, laurent Montel wrote:
Especially for KDE PIM, given the size of the userbase and the amount
of
developers (3), bugs often take more
On Friday, July 31, 2015 07:29:53 PM Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Friday 31 July 2015 12:00:22 Allen Winter wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 04:01:37 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 14:05:09 CEST, laurent Montel wrote:
Especially for KDE PIM, given the size of the userbase
On Wednesday 29 July 2015 09:04:42 Martin Klapetek wrote:
Can you perhaps create a single diff against 5.5/dev/master
which could be easily applied? That should make things
much easier to help :)
Assuming you're talking about the dbus changes, wouldn't you actually want to
cherry-pick them
On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 11:03:15 AM Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote:
On Wednesday 29 July 2015 09:04:42 Martin Klapetek wrote:
Can you perhaps create a single diff against 5.5/dev/master
which could be easily applied? That
GENERAL INFO
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs%20KDE-4.14%20latest-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/10/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:00:38 +
Build duration: 44 min
CHANGE SET
Revision
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 19:29:53 CEST, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
I also do not see the point in nagging the user after a certain period of
time if nobody else ever cared to comment on the bug. Feels a bit like
little kids asking Are we there yet? over and over again.
The idea is not only to get
Le Friday 31 July 2015, 11:07:54 Daniel Vrátil a écrit :
On Friday, July 31, 2015 10:12:00 AM Christoph Cullmann wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
True that!
As the manpower is limited and we
On Friday, July 31, 2015 09:55:30 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 19:29:53 CEST, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
I also do not see the point in nagging the user after a certain period of
time if nobody else ever cared to comment on the bug. Feels a bit like
little kids asking Are we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121755/#review83215
---
Ship it!
the description makes a good commit message, so
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Dominik Haumann dhaum...@kde.org wrote:
Of course, some wishes and valid bugs would be automatically closed then,
too.
But this is probably not a big issue, since a wish that will never get
implemented
is useful neither for us as developers nor for the
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Christoph Cullmann
cullm...@absint.com wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
As the manpower is limited and we sometimes not even keep up with the
incoming new bugs,
El Divendres, 31 de juliol de 2015, a les 11:02:44, Dominik Haumann va
escriure:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Christoph Cullmann
cullm...@absint.com wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Luigi Toscano wrote:
Feedback on Phabricator gathered outside the BoF from people who could not
attend:
Were there no complaints about the fact that you can still not view anything
at all without logging in?
This
One thing that bothers me a bit is the commits shas having format like
rKONVERSATIONc64d1cd32445f6921109fdbdb17ae44378d404c5
Can something be done about the rPROJECTNAME prefix? I find it
quite confusing and hard to read; if you're looking at commits in
a specific repo, I think it's clear to
Hi,
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
As the manpower is limited and we sometimes not even keep up with the incoming
new bugs, might
it be a good idea to adopt a similar strategy like the Qt Project and expire
bugs
On Friday, July 31, 2015 10:12:00 AM Christoph Cullmann wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
True that!
As the manpower is limited and we sometimes not even keep up with the
incoming new bugs, might it
On Friday, July 31, 2015 11:02:44 AM Dominik Haumann wrote:
Comments? Strong objections? ;)
+1 - I think it's a sensible strategy and something we kind of implemented
with introducing a new product for Plasma: thus getting rid of the old cruft.
Fun note: I set a bug as RESOLVED FIXED
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Martin Klapetek
martin.klape...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing that bothers me a bit is the commits shas having format like
rKONVERSATIONc64d1cd32445f6921109fdbdb17ae44378d404c5
Can something be done about the rPROJECTNAME prefix? I find it
quite confusing and
22 matches
Mail list logo
