Sorry for digging up this 1-month-old thread, but:
Martin Briza wrote:
We're building KDM with the support (no real reason to put it away except
getting rid of dependency on the library) but anyway, everything should
run just fine if you don't really use any of the CK functionality...
Not
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:51:33 +0100, Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org wrote:
Ahoys
I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a
system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful, so the
question arose whether distributions with such a lineup should build
without CK
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:49:07 +0100, Harald Sitter sit...@kde.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Matthias Klumpp matth...@tenstral.net
wrote:
2014-02-17 13:55 GMT+01:00 Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com:
Dne 17.2.2014 11:51, Harald Sitter napsal(a):
Ahoys
I was looking for some input
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Harald Sitter wrote:
Right, but short of patching KDM to gain proper logind support, should
one build with or without CK,
build without it.
i.e. does CK add anything useful if the
rest of the system is not using it
Ahoys
I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a
system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful, so the
question arose whether distributions with such a lineup should build
without CK support. In short:
If the rest of the system uses Logind, should KDM be
Dne 17.2.2014 11:51, Harald Sitter napsal(a):
Ahoys
I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a
system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful, so the
question arose whether distributions with such a lineup should build
without CK support. In short:
If the
2014-02-17 13:55 GMT+01:00 Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com:
Dne 17.2.2014 11:51, Harald Sitter napsal(a):
Ahoys
I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a
system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful, so the
question arose whether distributions with such
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Matthias Klumpp matth...@tenstral.net wrote:
2014-02-17 13:55 GMT+01:00 Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com:
Dne 17.2.2014 11:51, Harald Sitter napsal(a):
Ahoys
I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a
system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK
Harald Sitter wrote:
Right, but short of patching KDM to gain proper logind support, should
one build with or without CK,
build without it.
i.e. does CK add anything useful if the
rest of the system is not using it anyway
no. As I understand it, this is the only case where you'd want to
