On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 8:52 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dilluns, 7 de juny de 2021, a les 20:46:25 (CEST), Nate Graham va
> escriure:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > The Fedora packagers were mentioning to me today that it would be a lot
> > easier for them to ship Qt with our patch collection if w
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:52 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>
> El dilluns, 7 de juny de 2021, a les 20:46:25 (CEST), Nate Graham va escriure:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > The Fedora packagers were mentioning to me today that it would be a lot
> > easier for them to ship Qt with our patch collection if we
Hi, I'm looking for distros having snapshots with Qt 5.13.
I've found snapshots.debian.org but there was an update 5.12 -> 5.14
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 10:52 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:52 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> >
> > El dilluns, 7 de juny de 2021, a les 20:46:25 (CEST), Nate Graham va
> escriure:
> > > Hello folks,
> > >
> > > The Fedora packagers were mentioning to me today that it would be a
Am Dienstag, 8. Juni 2021, 12:51:35 CEST schrieb Neal Gompa:
> You *already* are using version numbers and bumped it to 5.15.3:
> https://blog.neon.kde.org/2021/06/04/kde-neons-qt-is-now-built-from-kdes-git
> -branches/
KDE did not bump the version number, the 5.15 (and kde/5.15) branch contains
t
If I understand you correct you are looking at a distro with exactly using
5.13
then from this list :
https://repology.org/project/qt/badges
mandriva 4.0 is using it :
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openmandriva/files/release/obsolete/4.0/
Ömer Fadıl Usta
PGP key : 0xfd11561976b1690b
about.me/o
В письме от вторник, 8 июня 2021 г. 15:34:30 MSK пользователь Ömer Fadıl USTA
написал:
> If I understand you correct you are looking at a distro with exactly using
> 5.13
> then from this list :
I am looking for a distro which can be bisected through dates to identify
which version of Qt is broke
On 6/8/21 5:20 AM, David Redondo wrote:
Am Dienstag, 8. Juni 2021, 12:51:35 CEST schrieb Neal Gompa:
You *already* are using version numbers and bumped it to 5.15.3:
https://blog.neon.kde.org/2021/06/04/kde-neons-qt-is-now-built-from-kdes-git
-branches/
KDE did not bump the version number, the
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:04 AM Nate Graham wrote:
>
> On 6/8/21 5:20 AM, David Redondo wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 8. Juni 2021, 12:51:35 CEST schrieb Neal Gompa:
> >> You *already* are using version numbers and bumped it to 5.15.3:
> >> https://blog.neon.kde.org/2021/06/04/kde-neons-qt-is-now-built-f
On 07/06/2021 22:52, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El dilluns, 7 de juny de 2021, a les 20:46:25 (CEST), Nate Graham va escriure:
Hello folks,
The Fedora packagers were mentioning to me today that it would be a lot
easier for them to ship Qt with our patch collection if we made tags and
tarballs. Is
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:22 AM Ahmad Samir wrote:
>
> On 07/06/2021 22:52, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El dilluns, 7 de juny de 2021, a les 20:46:25 (CEST), Nate Graham va
> > escriure:
> >> Hello folks,
> >>
> >> The Fedora packagers were mentioning to me today that it would be a lot
> >> easie
On mardi 8 juin 2021 15:04:20 CEST Nate Graham wrote:
> On 6/8/21 5:20 AM, David Redondo wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 8. Juni 2021, 12:51:35 CEST schrieb Neal Gompa:
> >> You *already* are using version numbers and bumped it to 5.15.3:
> >> https://blog.neon.kde.org/2021/06/04/kde-neons-qt-is-now-built-
On 07/06/2021 20:46, Nate Graham wrote:
Hello folks,
The Fedora packagers were mentioning to me today that it would be a
lot easier for them to ship Qt with our patch collection if we made
tags and tarballs. Is this something we could look into doing?
Nate
I think it would help the discussio
On 6/8/21 9:02 AM, Nicolas Fella wrote:
On 07/06/2021 20:46, Nate Graham wrote:
Hello folks,
The Fedora packagers were mentioning to me today that it would be a
lot easier for them to ship Qt with our patch collection if we made
tags and tarballs. Is this something we could look into doing?
Na
Am Dienstag, 8. Juni 2021, 16:56:56 CEST schrieb David Faure:
> On mardi 8 juin 2021 15:04:20 CEST Nate Graham wrote:
> > That being the case, what is the problem with us tagging it as 5.15.3?
> > We would not be using our own version number but rather the one set by
> > upstream. If the issue is o
Please don't get me wrong but naming these patches under name of KDE will
make people confuse.
That will lead people to think that it is just KDE-related. So my
suggestion is naming is something like
qt-15.3-communityN that will let everyone take these patches whether if
they are using KDE or not.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 6:36 PM Ömer Fadıl USTA wrote:
>
> Please don't get me wrong but naming these patches under name of KDE will
> make people confuse.
> That will lead people to think that it is just KDE-related. So my suggestion
> is naming is something like
> qt-15.3-communityN that will l
Hi,
we are all making progress but the way to notice it can be painful.
Looking at something you created years ago might make you cringe, but
that's actually a good sign. It indicates, that you made progress.
KDE is making progress as well. Here the indicator is outdated
documentation. There
> I'm unsure whether we should stick to "those are patches, grab them"
> or, for convenience, giving it a version number that is more than 5.15.2,
> less than 5.15.3, says it comes from kde, and allows multiple releases
I would suggest simply using 5.12.2-kdemmdd for those, if it will happ
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 8. Juni 2021, 12:51:35 CEST schrieb Neal Gompa:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:52 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> >
> > El dilluns, 7 de juny de 2021, a les 20:46:25 (CEST), Nate Graham va
> > escriure:
> > > Hello folks,
> > >
> > > The Fedora packagers were mentioning to me today th
20 matches
Mail list logo
