On Sunday 17 August 2014 18:41:16 Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Sonntag, 17. August 2014 18:38:29 CEST, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Konqueror and rekonq use the same engine. So what one renders, so does the
other.
The may ship with different defaults for khtml or webkit as backend.
No they don't.
Without Konqueror there's no proxy support dialog on systemsettings, with
is a shame. With the necessary caretaking, I can try to start a port, but
my free time nowdays is really really low.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Lindsay Mathieson
lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug
well , in my daily usage i have seen this :
firefox renders better webpages :
it's a standard for web browsing , this is an average opinion , i
mean there are website where firefox doesn't work well , instead
chromium and konqueror do.
chromium, is integrated better in kde , for example if you
On Sunday 17 August 2014 12:56:41 Nowardev-Team wrote:
rekonq : it's something that is in the middle it's lighter but it
lacks of a lots of stuff and it doesn't render well pages , bank
websites etc, so i don't use it .
finally my love konqueror , LOL i like it even if it has problems ,
and
On Sonntag, 17. August 2014 18:38:29 CEST, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Konqueror and rekonq use the same engine. So what one renders, so does the
other.
The may ship with different defaults for khtml or webkit as backend.
(Actually rekonq might even be linked to a newer version of QtWebkit in his
Hello Josh,
I have indeed done a pretty bad job maintaining Konqueror the past many
years. My focus has completely switched to lower layers (kdelibs4 / KDE
Frameworks 5 and Qt).
I finally took the time to write a blog post about how konqueror needs a new
maintainer and/or a new developer
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Ian Wadham iandw...@gmail.com wrote:
A subsidiary question. What replaces Konqueror now? Dolphin replaces the
file manager functionality, but what is the official supported KDE browser?
I guess it is Rekonq.
--
Roney
Visit
On , Roney Gomes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Ian Wadham iandw...@gmail.com
wrote:
A subsidiary question. What replaces Konqueror now? Dolphin replaces
the
file manager functionality, but what is the official supported KDE
browser?
I guess it is Rekonq.
Why does the web browser
On Monday 31 March 2014 15:13:22 Josh Liberty wrote:
On , Roney Gomes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Ian Wadham iandw...@gmail.com
wrote:
A subsidiary question. What replaces Konqueror now? Dolphin replaces
the
file manager functionality, but what is the official supported
On Monday 31 March 2014 14:25:00 Wolfgang Mader wrote:
On Monday 31 March 2014 15:13:22 Josh Liberty wrote:
On , Roney Gomes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Ian Wadham iandw...@gmail.com
wrote:
A subsidiary question. What replaces Konqueror now? Dolphin replaces
the
Em seg 31 mar 2014, às 15:13:22, Josh Liberty escreveu:
I'm not trying to bash anyone, I'm just really wondering about that. Is
rekonq good enough for most KDE users (I find that hard to believe)?
Why do you think it's hard to believe?
I use rekonq for almost everything and for my full daily
On Monday, 2014-03-31, 15:13:22, Josh Liberty wrote:
I'm not trying to bash anyone, I'm just really wondering about that. Is
rekonq good enough for most KDE users (I find that hard to believe)? Is
everyone just using Firefox/Chrome?
I am using Konqueror.
Have been for many, many years :-)
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:39:47 AM Thiago Macieira wrote:
I'm not trying to bash anyone, I'm just really wondering about that. Is
rekonq good enough for most KDE users (I find that hard to believe)?
Why do you think it's hard to believe?
I use rekonq for almost everything and for my full
On Tuesday, 2014-04-01, 06:54:36, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
No extensions/plugins - there's a number of extensions in firefox I just
don't wwant to do without.
However Aandrea is porting rekonq to K5 and there is a proposal for an
extension api.
For me extensions are close to being a must
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 04:35:56 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Do the code, I'm sure we can review the changes and agree on them if they
are good
Ok :)
--
Lindsay
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to
On 28/03/2014, at 9:16 PM, Aaron Zakhrov wrote:
some distros ship it (Konqueror) as the default web browser but it is still a
pretty good file manager
A subsidiary question. What replaces Konqueror now? Dolphin replaces the
file manager functionality, but what is the official supported KDE
I took a look at the developer list, but it seems to be all Dolphin now.
Was interested in adding a couple of features.
--
Lindsay
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe
some distros ship it as the default web browser but it is still a pretty
good file manager
On Mar 28, 2014 3:40 PM, Lindsay Mathieson lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com
wrote:
I took a look at the developer list, but it seems to be all Dolphin now.
Was interested in adding a couple of features.
--
On Friday 28 March 2014 20:09:41 Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
I took a look at the developer list, but it seems to be all Dolphin now.
Was interested in adding a couple of features.
The best thing about free software is that projects never die, so go ahead and
implement those features! :)
On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:29:11 AM Àlex Fiestas wrote:
he best thing about free software is that projects never die, so go ahead
and implement those features!
Is there still a project maintainer who can ok additions? I want to make minor
changes to the UI and add inline spellchecking for the
20 matches
Mail list logo
