On 3/12/20 10:57 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
The git tags are still signed by Linus. Does that cover your concerns?
Not really, no. I think that multiplying the intermediaries between kernel.org
and the Fedora repos by adding gitlab.com in the middle might not b
On 2/24/20 1:24 PM, stan wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:29:07 +0100
Florian Weimer wrote:
* stan:
I built my first 5.6 custom kernel from the src.rpm yesterday in
F31. And my patch to enable the use of a daemon I run to gather
entropy from an rtl2832 (atmospheric) and put it into the kernel
After quite a bit of soul searching, I've decided to step down from
being a full-time Fedora kernel maintainer and move on to other things.
Having come in as a relative outsider to the Fedora community almost
5 years ago, I deeply appreciate you all welcoming me with open arms.
I still expect to b
On 12/12/19 9:10 AM, Justin Forbes wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 3:48 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
Hey All.
In digging through some pieces around CPU_IDLE I noticed that
NO_HZ_IDLE is explicitly disabled on x86_64 but not on all other
architectures.
Doing a "git log --follow
configs/fedora/gene
On 11/8/19 11:32 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
Continuing on the theme of bringing things into Fedora, one other
task I'm currently looking at is bringing the tools building back
into the kernel.spec file for testing purposes only.
Fedora split the kernel-tools and userspace packages out i
On 11/22/19 4:27 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
The kernel dist-git has a number of scripts in the script directory.
Some are used for regular work (stable-update.sh, rawhide-rc.sh,
rawhide-snapshot.sh) but some of them haven't been used in a
long time. I'd like to delete the following
On 11/24/19 12:38 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
Upstream provided several bug fix related to AMD APU Raven Ridge which hangs
when using some applications like radeontop to read its interface [1]. Test
model was 2018 HP Envy x360 Ryzen 2500U (device id 15dd):
drm/amdgpu: disable gfx
On 11/25/19 11:02 AM, stan wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:15:46 -0500
Laura Abbott wrote:
The process_configs.sh checks are designed to catch values changing
unexpecedtly the message
override: PSTORE_LZ4HC_COMPRESS_DEFAULT changes choice state
This indicates that some value set are now
On 11/24/19 1:00 PM, stan wrote:
I use the src.rpm from rawhide kernels to build a kernel custom
configured for my hardware in F31, and with a local patch, using the
old rpmbuild method. For rc5 this worked, when I tried rc7 it didn't.
And rc8 is failing with the same error. The error message is
On 11/24/19 1:10 PM, stan wrote:
I build a custom local kernel using the rawhide kernel src.rpm here on
F31. I change the spec file to build only for my arch, x86_64, and not
to build cross headers. But I notice that the config files for all the
nobuild archs are still processed. This seems lik
The kernel dist-git has a number of scripts in the script directory.
Some are used for regular work (stable-update.sh, rawhide-rc.sh,
rawhide-snapshot.sh) but some of them haven't been used in a
long time. I'd like to delete the following:
- check-patchlist.sh
- check-TODO.sh
- combine.sh
- grab-
On 11/9/19 12:51 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Hi
On 11/8/19 4:19 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to bring in another piece of downstream work into Fedora
sometime next week. The short summary is that Fedora will be bringing
in some files to build against a RHEL buildroo
Hi,
Continuing on the theme of bringing things into Fedora, one other
task I'm currently looking at is bringing the tools building back
into the kernel.spec file for testing purposes only.
Fedora split the kernel-tools and userspace packages out into
a separate repository at least two years ago.
Hi,
I'm looking to bring in another piece of downstream work into Fedora
sometime next week. The short summary is that Fedora will be bringing
in some files to build against a RHEL buildroot but Fedora will still
be the same.
The longer answer:
The goal with this work is bring Fedora and RHEL cl
On 10/31/19 1:04 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
hi,
please consider attached patch for fedora kernel.spec.
It enables CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF options to export BTF
info in /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux file.
I tested on x86_64/s390x/aarach64/ppc servers and the
file /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux shows correctly.
I che
Some of the downstream work I'm looking to bring back into Fedora is
some new subpackages. Here's a brief explanation of what I'd like to
bring in:
- several packages with 'kabi' in the name. These are related to downstream
ABI guarantees. All of the packages would be turned off for Fedora. No
Fe
If you didn't get a chance to see it, the talk I gave at Flock is up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb2VS2_P6Ts . I'm linking this not
for self-promotion but to give a heads up that some of the work
related to this talk may start to land in Fedora. Some of the boring
cleanup work will just go in
On 10/8/19 6:51 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Laura Abbott schrieb am 16.09.19 um 16:24:
Kernel 5.3 was released upstream yesterday Sept 16. Fedora will be
following the same rebase schedule as with past kernels. This means
F30 will be rebased to 5.3 first followed by F29 shortly thereafter.
We
On 9/26/19 11:44 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 3:30 PM Paul Moore wrote:
On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 14:48 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 2:47 PM Paul Moore
wrote:
Hello,
Last year there was a change to how the kernel-headers package is
built, and unfortunately t
until freeze
is over)
On Mon, 2019-09-16 at 10:24 -0400, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
Kernel 5.3 was released upstream yesterday Sept 16. Fedora will be
following the
same rebase schedule as with past kernels. This means F30 will be
rebased to 5.3
first followed by F29 shortly thereafter. We typically
On 8/15/19 8:57 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
I'd like to drop a bunch of patches Fedora has been carrying since
forever. Most of these are fairly minor tweaks most people forgot
we had and nobody cares about. My motivation is both in the spirit
of cleaning up and also to better align Fedora + RH
Hi,
Kernel 5.3 was released upstream yesterday Sept 16. Fedora will be following the
same rebase schedule as with past kernels. This means F30 will be rebased to 5.3
first followed by F29 shortly thereafter. We typically wait until the 2nd or 3rd
stable release to push a rebase. Based on past tim
On 9/10/19 4:00 PM, stan wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:18:17 +0100
Laura Abbott wrote:
This looks more like the patch is being applied in the wrong directory
if it can't find lib/Kconfig. Were there errors further up in the
build log?
No errors. And the directory and file it is lookin
On 9/8/19 5:49 PM, stan wrote:
Hi,
I build a custom kernel with rpmbuild. The latest kernel,
5.3.0-0.rc7.git1.1, fails when it patches. I noticed that the last
successful spec file had the lines shown below, while the latest
doesn't. However, adding them back does not enable patches, the build
On 9/4/19 3:54 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
---
configs/fedora/generic/s390x/CONFIG_HMC_DRV | 1 +
kernel-s390x-debug.config | 2 +-
kernel-s390x.config | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 configs/fedora/generic/s390
On 8/28/19 1:58 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 07:53:20AM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 8/26/19 11:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:16 AM Laura Abbott wrote:
On 8/23/19 9:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote
On 8/27/19 8:46 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 27-08-19 09:14, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:27 PM Laura Abbott wrote:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190826181956.6918-1-lukas.bulw...@gmail.com/
menuconfig SFI
bool "SFI (Simple Firmware Interface) Su
On 8/26/19 11:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:16 AM Laura Abbott wrote:
On 8/23/19 9:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were broken, and
this got accepted as a release
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190826181956.6918-1-lukas.bulw...@gmail.com/
menuconfig SFI
bool "SFI (Simple Firmware Interface) Support"
---help---
The Simple Firmware Interface (SFI) provides a lightweight method
for platform firmware to pass information to the o
On 8/23/19 9:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were broken, and
this got accepted as a release blocker:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733388
Summary: This bug was introduced an
On 8/23/19 1:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 3:48 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
Hey folks!
So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were broken, and
this got accepted as a release blocker:
https://bugzilla.redhat
On 8/22/19 8:58 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 8/19/19 9:15 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 8/16/19 2:57 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Florian Weimer schreef op vr 16-08-2019 om 14:04 [+0200]:
RHEL has a larger NR_CPU value, though. For example, it's 8192 on
x86-64, while Fedora 31 has 1024.
O
On 8/19/19 3:29 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to get the following test patch in a Rawhide kernel as
a one off for testing? Or is that a PITA? Ordinarily I'd just build a
kernel myself locally, but that build machine is in a very confused
Rawhide<-->Branched state and so I can't.
B
On 8/16/19 2:55 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Hi Laura,
Laura Abbott schreef op do 15-08-2019 om 15:57 [-0400]:
.../fedora/generic/x86/x86_64/CONFIG_NR_CPUS | 2 +-
kernel.spec | 2 --
...-CPUMASK_OFFSTACK-usable-without-deb.patch | 34 ---
3
On 8/16/19 2:57 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Florian Weimer schreef op vr 16-08-2019 om 14:04 [+0200]:
RHEL has a larger NR_CPU value, though. For example, it's 8192 on
x86-64, while Fedora 31 has 1024.
On the Fedora x86-64 debug builds it's 8192 again. Why's that?
Paul Bolle
That's the option
On 8/16/19 6:58 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 3:57 PM Laura Abbott wrote:
We've been carrying a patch to make CPUMASK_OFFSTACK selectable
without debugging for a long time now. The comment said this was
going to be replaced with something else but that never seemed
to h
On 8/16/19 7:00 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 3:58 PM Laura Abbott wrote:
We've come a long way. Let's just leave these drivers alone.
Can we not build them at all instead? Or put them in modules-extra if
we're too chicken to disable them entirely.
I like
On 8/16/19 6:56 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 4:02 PM Laura Abbott wrote:
This has since been replaced by other in kernel pieces. We
can finally drop it.
Which pieces?
/proc/kcore now does most of the work of the crash driver. I've helped
fix up misc pieces in the
This has since been replaced by other in kernel pieces. We
can finally drop it.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott
---
crash-driver.patch | 722 -
kernel.spec| 2 -
2 files changed, 724 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 crash-driver.patch
diff
It's been years and gcc has changed a lot.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott
---
Kbuild-Add-an-option-to-enable-GCC-VTA.patch | 94
kernel.spec | 2 -
2 files changed, 96 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 Kbuild-Add-an-option-to-enabl
Let's see if this results in flooding.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott
---
input-kill-stupid-messages.patch | 30 --
kernel.spec | 2 --
2 files changed, 32 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 input-kill-stupid-messages.patch
diff --git a/input
We've come a long way. Let's just leave these drivers alone.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott
---
die-floppy-die.patch | 29 -
kernel.spec | 4
no-pcspkr-modalias.patch | 22 --
3 files changed, 55 deletions(-)
d
It's been years. Let's see if we actually still need this.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott
---
ath9k-rx-dma-stop-check.patch | 38 ---
kernel.spec | 2 --
2 files changed, 40 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 ath9k-rx-dma-stop-check.p
k it's worth it since the upper bound is
now 512. This should be enough for most Fedora use cases so just
drop the patch.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott
---
.../fedora/generic/x86/x86_64/CONFIG_NR_CPUS | 2 +-
kernel.spec | 2 --
...-CPUMASK_OFFSTACK-usab
It's been years since we've seen this warning. Just drop it.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott
---
kernel.spec | 2 -
...validate_disk-prevent-NULL-ptr-deref.patch | 39 ---
2 files changed, 41 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 scsi-sd_reval
We've come a long way for namespaces since 2013 and
all arches now enable namespaces. Drop the patch where
we can turn it off and on.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott
---
kernel.spec| 2 --
namespaces-no-expert.patch | 27 ---
2 files changed, 29 dele
We've been carrying this patch for years. If someone wants to
do the work to get it upstream, they are welcome to do so.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott
---
kernel.spec | 2 -
lis3-improve-handling-of-null-rate.patch | 75
2 files change
video should be up soon).
If someone wants to make an effort at upstreaming any of these, feel
free to do so but I really think most of these are cruft.
Thanks,
Laura
Laura Abbott (9):
Drop namespaces config tweak
Drop cpumask auto select patch
Drop scsi warning patch
Remove ancient
On 8/14/19 8:35 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:03 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 8/12/19 8:35 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:23 AM Paul Moore wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 8:31 AM Paul Moore wrote:
Hello all,
I'm not sure if this is the place for this, but if
On 8/1/19 2:21 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
---
configs/fedora/generic/powerpc/CONFIG_SERIAL_8250 | 1 -
configs/fedora/generic/powerpc/CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE | 1 -
kernel-ppc64le-debug.config | 4 ++--
kernel-ppc64le.config | 4 ++--
4 files changed,
On 7/26/19 5:07 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
NVRAM is enabled by default in the mainline kernel on all ppc machines.
Related: #1732612
---
configs/fedora/generic/powerpc/CONFIG_NVRAM | 1 +
kernel-ppc64le-debug.config | 2 +-
kernel-ppc64le.config | 2 +-
3 fil
On 7/23/19 4:19 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
On 7/19/19 1:09 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
On 7/4/19 6:12 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
I think we have identified the root cause of the 32-bit builder issue.
Many thanks to Paul and Peter for assistance in debugging. Here's my
write-up, and we'll work with the vend
On 7/18/19 3:37 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Do you plan to leave in the -rc kernel headers for the mass rebuild?
We see some rather odd issues with it when building glibc, and have
trouble getting glibc ready for the mass rebuild.
Thanks,
Florian
Yes, I screwed those up.
https://koji.fedorapro
On 7/10/19 2:49 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
The Kconfig symbol ASIX_PHY was renamed to AX88796B_PHY in v5.2-rc6, see
upstream commit a9520543b123 ("net: phy: rename Asix Electronics PHY
driver"). CONFIG_AX88796B_PHY is already used in the configuration generation
system, so we can safely remove CONFIG_
On 7/8/19 9:20 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Hey,
Would it be possible to enable the CONFIG_RC_XBOX_DVD kernel
config, as a module, so that they can be used with Fedora?
While the device itself might look like it isn't compatible
with anything but an original XBox:
https://retro.poromagia.com/media
On 5/18/19 11:48 AM, Alan Jenkins wrote:
Hi
I was surprised to realize that Fedora kernels do not enable
CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK. Is there any reason why it should not enable it?
Fedora kernels appear to be an outlier here, v.s. RHEL, Debian, Ubuntu and SUSE.
I'm not taking a postion on whet
On 5/16/19 2:42 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 06:38:38PM +, Jeremy Cline wrote:
Hi Jiri,
On 4/2/19 6:35 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
hi,
please consider attached change that adds libbpf sub
package to be generated within kernel-tools spec.
We need libbpf in a separate package, star
F28 is seeing a pretty big fall off in karma for new kernels.
This is somewhat expected as we move towards F30 release.
If you happen to have an F28 system around, please remember
to test and give karma.
Thanks,
Laura
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@l
Hi,
As you probably have seen, kernel 5.0 was released last night. This
has been built in rawhide. We'll be following the usual rebase
procedure for f29 and f28: Around the time when 5.0.2 or 5.0.3
is released, that kernel will go into f29. f28 will be rebased
shortly afterwards. We don't have an
On 2/25/19 1:42 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Hi,
Reading this
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelBugTriage#Triage_Quickstart
Is it possible to get bugzi...@colorremedies.com added to distribution
whenever a bug is set to CC fedora-kernel-bt...@fedoraproject.org ?
Thanks,
No objections here. It
On 2/19/19 10:47 AM, Dulaney wrote:
On Gearr 18, 2019 aig 12:26:04f -0800, sgrìobh Laura Abbott:
Yes, that was the case I was concerned about with gcc being updated.
I guess the case would be where the kernel gets built with a different
gcc that isn't yet on a local system. Doing a ba
At DevConf a few weeks ago, Stephen Gallagher and Will Woods gave a talk about
removing rpm scriptlets. The recording hasn't been uploaded yet but the slides
are available
https://schd.ws/hosted_files/devconfcz2019/bc/scriptlet-reform-school-3.pdf
The kernel uses a few scriptlets at the moment wh
On 2/15/19 3:47 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Laura Abbott:
I've been experimenting with enabling CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS in the kernel
since I've heard some people express interest in stackleak (I'm interested
as well). a gcc plugin gets built as an .so file for use during
compilation
On 2/14/19 4:19 PM, stan wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:09:04 -0800
Laura Abbott wrote:
Can anyone see major problems with requiring the same toolchain
version for building external modules as the kernel?
If gcc is updated between Fedora kernel versions and someone wants to
build a module
I've been experimenting with enabling CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS in the kernel
since I've heard some people express interest in stackleak (I'm interested
as well). a gcc plugin gets built as an .so file for use during
compilation. This means we need to package this .so file as part
of kernel-devel for bui
On 2/11/19 1:57 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
Hi,
the root cause of https://marc.info/?t=15482482101&r=1&w=2 was
fixed in gcc trunk (only) and it's now available in gcc-9.0.1-0.4.fc30.
Something like the patch bellow is needed, but things get complicated,
because the new constraint won't be availabl
On 1/25/19 12:43 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
To complete flickerfree boot support and remove the last modeset
on systems using an Intel iGPU, I've been working with i915 upstream
to make i915.fastboot=1 the default, this is part of:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlickerFreeBoot
I've j
gcc9 exposed an underlying issue with some inline asm on s390x. I've emailed
upstream about the issue but it's still not fixed. In the interest of
continuing to test kernels, I've disabled this arch in rawhide kernels
for now. I'll be keeping an eye on this and plan to turn this arch back
on as so
On 1/15/19 1:44 AM, pa...@fliagreco.com.ar wrote:
From: Pablo Greco
---
kernel.spec | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec
index 280..25ad968 100644
--- a/kernel.spec
+++ b/kernel.spec
@@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ BuildKernel() {
#
On 1/15/19 8:51 AM, stan wrote:
I compiled a custom fedora 5.0 kernel, and one of the new options was
to have the kernel zero the stack on return from kernel functions. The
cost was about 1% on a single cpu system. I made the judgement that
this would be great on cloud servers, but wasn't reall
On 1/12/19 3:13 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Commit c9c254b74995 ("minor Arm config tweaks") set CONFIG_PCI_MESON to
'y' for all shipped arm and aarch64 .config files. It didn't add the
corrresponding change to the configuration generation directory. Do so
now.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
---
configs/
On 1/12/19 9:37 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
These non-standard filenames have no effect on the build, but should
still be fixed since they could be confusing (to people and scripts).
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
---
...FIG_ALTERA_PR_IP_CORE_PLAT=n => CONFIG_ALTERA_PR_IP_CORE_PLAT} | 0
configs/fedora
On 1/11/19 6:55 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
This short series cleans up all references to Kconfig symbols that have
no effect on the build.
This series is way too boring to review. But it can be tested by
comparing the generated .config files (in the BUILD directory) before
and after this series. Thes
On 1/11/19 7:16 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Peter Robinson schreef op vr 11-01-2019 om 15:04 [+]:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:56 PM Paul Bolle wrote:
configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_RTC | 1 -
I'm pretty sure RTC is still a very valid option.
Upstream says:
depends on ALPHA
On 12/28/18 1:34 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
Hello folks,
is there anything I can do for this patch-set to get maintainers'
attention? Thanks!
In the future, please wait a longer time before asking about
the status, especially given this was over a holiday break.
I applied the patch to rawhi
On 12/11/18 3:48 AM, Alan Jenkins wrote:
Hi
mattdm suggested the upcoming scheduler change should be discussed here.[1] I
might not have enough time to talk details at the moment, but I noticed this is
coming up relatively soon. This is what I understand so far about the decision.
Thanks for
On 12/3/18 8:46 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.12.18 um 17:42 schrieb Laura Abbott:
On 12/2/18 6:20 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
how does Fedora think to handle
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201685
4.18.20 is the last 4.18.x and happily at least 4.18.20 from F27 runs
fine on F28
On 12/2/18 6:20 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
how does Fedora think to handle
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201685
4.18.20 is the last 4.18.x and happily at least 4.18.20 from F27 runs
fine on F28 systems but given that bug upgrade to 4.19.x seems to be
just a lottery with your data - o
On 11/13/18 8:57 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
For some time now the build generates a number of override warnings,
like this one:
[...]:warning: override: VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE changes choice state
These warnings are triggered when the build uses a .config that has
more than one option set in
On 10/11/2018 05:58 AM, pa...@fliagreco.com.ar wrote:
From: Pablo Greco
---
kernel.spec | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec
index 311ef4c..e90a714 100644
--- a/kernel.spec
+++ b/kernel.spec
@@ -125,8 +125,10 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel
%define d
On 10/09/2018 06:34 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1637547
getting filed. I'm suspicious that this may be caused by the new
deferred fbcon takeover stuff.
So I double checked the settings in the fedpkg f28 branch and I noticed
that CONFI
On 10/02/2018 08:18 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Di, 02.10.18 14:34, Hans de Goede (hdego...@redhat.com) wrote:
Ok fair enough. Keeping it easy for users to try out hibernate is
a valid argument.
This is just weird. Why would GNOME expose a button to regular user
that reads "hey, press me
On 10/02/2018 09:16 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On Di, 02.10.18 10:16, Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) wrote:
Until the kernel can use a dedicated partition for hibernation, which
would fix the majority of problems users can encounter, we're just
offering more
On 10/02/2018 08:12 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Can you give examples of other kernel subsystems that are also
advertised as available by the Fedora kernel, and part of the core
kernel RPM but are of this "tech preview" kind?
Another example would be kexec. The Fedora kernel nominally support
On 09/13/2018 06:25 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
I've been getting some reports that the kernel is not fully quiet /
the boot is not fully smooth / flickerfree when using secure boot.
This is fixed by this patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git/commit/?id=ecb77f61f1
On 08/14/2018 09:14 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
As you probably saw, 4.18 was released on Sunday. The 4.18 kernel was
built for rawhide yesterday. We will be following roughly the same
rebase schedule as in the past. F28 will get the rebase first,
typically around 4.18.2 or 4.18.3 followed by
On 08/29/2018 01:05 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"LA" == Laura Abbott writes:
LA> My current plan is to push the F28 rebase early next week. If you
LA> get a chance, please test the F29 kernel or the package in the
LA> kernel-stabilization COPR.
I thought we w
On 08/17/2018 06:57 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 08/14/2018 09:14 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
As you probably saw, 4.18 was released on Sunday. The 4.18 kernel was
built for rawhide yesterday. We will be following roughly the same
rebase schedule as in the past. F28 will get the rebase first
On 08/14/2018 09:14 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
As you probably saw, 4.18 was released on Sunday. The 4.18 kernel was
built for rawhide yesterday. We will be following roughly the same
rebase schedule as in the past. F28 will get the rebase first,
typically around 4.18.2 or 4.18.3 followed by
On 08/16/2018 05:27 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 14-08-18 18:14, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
As you probably saw, 4.18 was released on Sunday. The 4.18 kernel was
built for rawhide yesterday. We will be following roughly the same
rebase schedule as in the past. F28 will get the rebase first
On 08/15/2018 07:10 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 07:14:00AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
[Removed Fedora devel list because it's subscriber-only]
On Aug 8, 2018, at 12:29 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Probably a good idea to cc: this to the kernel list :-)
I suspect
On 08/15/2018 01:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
* Di Aug 14 2018 Justin M. Forbes - 4.17.14-101
- Fix "Foreshadow" CVE-2018-3620 CVE-2018-3646 (rhbz 1585005 1615998)
-
CentOS 6: 2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64
[root@honeypot:~]$ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/*
/sys/devices/system/c
Hi,
As you probably saw, 4.18 was released on Sunday. The 4.18 kernel was
built for rawhide yesterday. We will be following roughly the same
rebase schedule as in the past. F28 will get the rebase first,
typically around 4.18.2 or 4.18.3 followed by F27 shortly thereafter.
My best guess for when
On 07/30/2018 08:18 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02-07-18 13:55, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
On 28-06-18 16:19, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
Good news on the patch to make the loglevel for quiet configurable,
this has been accepted into -next now. I plan to add this to the
Fedora kernels
On 07/30/2018 09:02 AM, stan wrote:
I downloaded the src.rpm from koji, and then used rpm -ivh to install
it into the ~/rpmbuild tree. Expanded the src with
rpmbuild -bp kernel.spec
I used the last build config file to run
make oldconfig
with no errors or additions. Then I copied that config to
On 07/29/2018 10:43 AM, stan wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 10:12:04 -0700
stan wrote:
Hi,
I build the kernel every few weeks from the koji rawhide src.rpm for
the latest kernel version. This has been working fine for the 4.18
kernels until the latest version. Since I'm only building locally fo
On 07/23/2018 11:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 12:06 PM Laura Abbott wrote
On 07/22/2018 12:12 PM, stan wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 18:49:36 +0100
Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hello , I need bisect kernel between kernel 4.15-git1 and 4.15.0-git2
where I find a git tree with
On 07/22/2018 12:12 PM, stan wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 18:49:36 +0100
Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hello , I need bisect kernel between kernel 4.15-git1 and 4.15.0-git2
where I find a git tree with these commits (patch-4.14-git1.xz to
patch-4.14-git2.xz) ?
this request is related with my nvidia
Hi,
The kbuild kernel maintainer has accepted the last changes needed for
unique build ids upstream so I went ahead and applied the series to
rawhide. This means that parallel debuginfo should actually
work for future kernel builds. As part of this change, I also enabled
the hardening flags for t
Hi,
If you haven't seen it, Fedora has a new documentation project
called quick-docs to move information off the wiki,
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/quick-docs/en-US/index.html
We've started moving some of the kernel information there.
Any requests for kernel related items you'd like documented?
1 - 100 of 272 matches
Mail list logo
