And sonex
On Feb 18, 2014 3:48 PM, "Tony King" wrote:
> Polyethylene tanks are common in ultralights.
>
> TK
>
> On 19 February 2014 04:52, Wayne Tokarz wrote:
>
> > Let's put this one to rest, In all the world of motor sports and
> vehicles,
> > only ONE plastic is used to make fuel tanks and
At 11:11 AM 2/20/2014, you wrote:
>The slower the better in an emergency. On the mains is not as slow
>as three point. I know this is going to bring up a big debate. But
>as Mark says when you need to get stop fast there's only one way to do it.
Wow! ?Your KR Gatherings look like a blast. ?Better attendance than our last
one.
On the Rotax 582 vs VW:
FWIW, I have flown two otherwise identical Avid Flyers, one with a 2180 VW and
the other with a Rotax 582. ?There was no question the Rotax powered one was
significantly better in climb
Thanks for the comments on angle of attack. You folks guessed at what I was
getting at. I meant with the airplane on the ground and 3. config. My angle
of attack is between 10 and 12 degrees for better visibility over the nose.
Thank you! Sounds like I'm in the ballpark.
Doran
N186RC
I'd heard that there was a real difference in the glide ratio of a plane
with a wind-milling prop as opposed to one with a stopped prop, and thought
I'd test it to find what the story was for my KR...because I figured it'd be
good to know some day. So one calm morning I climbed to 10,000' and
Eduaerdo,Thanks for the input on the KR gathering in Argentina.Very much
like the one in US.Fly safe.Tommy W.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Eduardo Barros wrote:
> In argentina fly a Kr 2s with Rotax 582, 65 HP, is Pupato?s KR
>
> Can you see a video of this:
I probably have 2000 hours in tailwheel airplanes. Almost 800in a KR 2. I also
own a bellanca cruiseair tailwheel have a lot of time in a Luscombe ,T craft
and a couple of other tailwheel airplanes. I could probably count how many main
wheel landings I have done on both hands. For those that do
The three point picture you see sitting on the ground. Watch your
speed or you will float down the runway, Virg
On 2/20/2014 3:44 AM, Doran Jaffas wrote:
> in the three point Landing configuration is anyone have any knowledge
> of the optimum angle of attack for the KR two
Larry Flesner wrote:
>>Mark's home airport runway is 2700 feet in length. On the one occasion I
had to visit him I was at taxi speed approximately half way down the runway.
I must confess that the direction I was landing, the runway has a slight
upgrade. Never the less, at my home airport, I
>
>
>I live in Albuquerque, NM where the airfield is at 5800 ASL
>+++
Jeff Scott will be your best advisor on that. His airport is higher
than yours.
My GUESS is that you'll want the KR to weight less than 625 pounds
empty and consider it a
At 06:35 AM 2/20/2014, you wrote:
>Doran Jaffas wrote:
>
> >In the three point Landing configuration is anyone have any knowledge of
>the optimum angle of attack for the KR two standard?
>
I think Mark was in the ball park with the
Doran Jaffas wrote:
>In the three point Landing configuration is anyone have any knowledge of
the optimum angle of attack for the KR two standard?
That depends...on how much runway you have, where you're talking about in
the landing process, and how hard you want to whack the runway with the
in the three point Landing configuration is anyone have any knowledge
of the optimum angle of attack for the KR two standard?
Doran
N186RC
13 matches
Mail list logo
