instead of the confusingly named Default, but it seemed
challenging enough that I never got around to it.
Evan
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:55 AM, <m...@percy.io> wrote:
> On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 1:29:28 PM UTC-7, Evan Jones wrote:
> > The sustained 1000 qps comes from an app
I recommend using the Google Cloud SQL proxy container so you don't need to
mess with IP whitelists. I don't quite get what you mean about "manual work
to edit my pod deployment file": You just need to copy and paste this
"sidecar" definition into your .yaml and leave it there. We have been
a Go DNS query generator, which was able to do
8 DNS queries per second, so dnsmasq does not appear to be the limit.
Thanks!
Evan
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Rodrigo Campos <rodr...@sdfg.com.ar> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 04:29:21PM -0400, Evan Jones wrote:
> > The
*TL;DR*: Kubernetes dnsPolicy: ClusterFirst can become a bottleneck with a
high rate of outbound connections. It seems like the problem is filling the
nf_conntrack table, causing client applications to fail to do DNS lookups.
I resolved this problem by switching my application to dnsPolicy:
Its been a while since I've dealt with this sort of issue, but there are
various libraries that use "native" memory outside the Java heap. The -Xmx
flag only limits the Java heap, so it isn't surprising that some processes
may need a way higher container memory limit than the Java GC heap
M, Traiano Welcome <trai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, 22 June 2017 18:16:22 UTC+4, Evan Jones wrote:
>>
>> The Cloud SQL Proxy logs suggest to me that it may not be using the right
>> credentials? It is possible that it is trying to use the cluster's &qu
7 at 9:46:52 AM UTC-4, Traiano Welcome wrote:
>
> Hi Evan
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Evan Jones <evan@triggermail.io
> > wrote:
>
>> I know nothing about wordpress, but for what it is worth, we are using
>> this Cloud SQL Proxy container with
On the cluster details page on https://console.cloud.google.com/kubernetes
, if you have upgraded to 1.6 (I think?), you should see the following drop
down to edit an existing cluster. I haven't yet attempted this personally:
A friend of mine ran into something that sounds suspiciously similar to
this. I don't recall the details about it, but he did tweet about
it: https://twitter.com/nicksantos/status/86997848164864
I seem to recall after the free trial expired, they literally had to delete
everything and
This won't directly help answer your questions, since I don't know the
answers. However, I found this talk about Kubernetes networking to be
extremely helpful to understand the basics. Whenever I'm running into
weirdness I end up reviewing it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2bhV81MfKQ
this is also true on an AWS managed equivalent like CoreOS's CloudFormation
> scripts.
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Evan Jones <evan.jo...@triggermail.io>
> wrote:
>
>> As Rodrigo described, we are using Container Engine. I haven't fully
>> tested this yet, but my pla
As Rodrigo described, we are using Container Engine. I haven't fully tested
this yet, but my plan is to assign "dedicated IPs" to a set of nodes,
probably in their own Node Pool as part of the cluster. Those are the IPs
used by outbound connections from pods running those nodes, if I recalling
Thank you! I had forgotten about that feature, since we previously have not
needed it. That will absolutely solve our problem, and be much better than
needing an "exceptional" thing outside of Kubernetes.
You are correct about what we need: We have a small number of services
where their
It turns out I've just run into a requirement to have a stable outbound IP
address as well. In looking into this: I think we will likely some kind of
proxy server running outside of Kubernetes. This will allow services "opt
in" to this special handling, rather than doing it for everything in
14 matches
Mail list logo
