For some reason the monitor option is included twice in this
datastructure. Probably a mistake during a merge. Patch also available at:
http://etud.epita.fr/~bevand_m/pub/kvm-remove-duplicate-monitor-option.patch
Signed-off-by: Marc Bevand gmail.com>
diff --git a/qemu/vl.c b/qemu/vl.c
index 7e4
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 09:43:20AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > If you migrate such a guest that has direct (ie. non-virtualized, using
> > the physical hardware) pmtimer access to a different host (destination),
> > you need to save the current host pmtimer value at the time of migration
> > so t
Bugs item #1970154, was opened at 2008-05-23 15:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by call518
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1970154&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment t
Alan Kennedy wrote:
Anthony Liguori codemonkey.ws> writes:
How are you interacting with the guest? via SDL? If so, do other SDL
applications work correctly? Are you using evdev in the host or in the
guest?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Thanks for the response.
I'm using SDL. I
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 15:30 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 16:59 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 12:10 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >> btw, is this with >= 4GB RAM on the host?
> > >
> > > Well, are you asking whether I have PAE on or n
i got it running under non-root.
first, i used to have a group 'kvm', and /dev/net/tun is writable by
this group. so, i made the 'temp' directories (/var/run/kvmctl/, and a
couple extra) also writable by the same group.
then, i added a couple calls to "tunctl" to pre-create the tap device
before
Oops, sent to the old list. Please reply-all to the LKML version if you
need to reply...
Forwarded Message
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
kvm-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Anthony N. Liguori [imap]
On June 2, 2008 11:20 am FinnTux N/A wrote:
> 2008/6/2 Freddie Cash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You may want to rename the script. There's already a kvmctl (at
> > least on Debian) in the /usr/sbin directory that is used for testing.
>
> It comes with some debian kvm packages?
It's part of the kvm p
After quick googling I renamed the script/product/whatever to virmactl
(VIrtual MAchine ConTroL).
Download:
http://81.209.59.133/virmactl-0.0.1.tar.gz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vg
2008/6/2 Freddie Cash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You may want to rename the script. There's already a kvmctl (at least on
> Debian) in the /usr/sbin directory that is used for testing.
It comes with some debian kvm packages? Anyways, I was afraid of these
naming issues. kvmctl is pretty generic name.
On June 2, 2008 10:29 am you wrote:
> For some reason I couldn't reply to my previous post...
>
> But here is a new version. Now with version number! :)
>
> Changes:
> - includes init script /etc/initd.d/kvm which starts and stops virtual
> machines when booting and shutting down the host. Shutting
For some reason I couldn't reply to my previous post...
But here is a new version. Now with version number! :)
Changes:
- includes init script /etc/initd.d/kvm which starts and stops virtual
machines when booting and shutting down the host. Shutting down the
guest is done by sending "system_power
On Monday 02 June 2008 19:27:31 Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > We can assign a device from the host machine to a guest. The original
> > code comes from Neocleus.
> >
> > A new command-line option, -pcidevice is added.
> > For example, to invoke it for an Ethernet device sitting at
On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 14:56 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 06:34:27PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 May 2008, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > KVM wishes to allow direct guest access to the ACPI pmtimer. In that
> > > case QEMU/KVM has to read the current value f
Avi Kivity wrote:
> David S. Ahern wrote:
>>> I haven't been able to reproduce this:
>>>
>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ps -elf | grep -E 'memuser|kscand'
1 S root 7 1 1 75 0- 0 schedu 10:07 ?
00:00:26 [kscand]
0 S root 1464 1 1 75 0
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 12:21:29PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> Addressing comments on the previous patchset, follows:
>>
>> - Same fake C2 emulation
>> - /dev/pmtimer
>> - Support for multiple IO bitmap pages + userspace interface
>> - In-kernel ACPI pmtimer emulation
>>
>>
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 14:35 +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On Friday 30 May 2008 23:00:41 Farkas Levente wrote:
> > this is out production server at the development department (10-15)
> > people using it so actually if i tell them that i'll stop the host and
> > all guests for max an hour it's acceptab
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:41 PM, FinnTux N/A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think pretty much everyone has made their own so here is mine.
looks pretty nice; i'm reworking my setup to adapt to yours.
(currently only on dev workstations, but soon will be a couple of
servers (replacing VMWare server
Amit Shah wrote:
From: Or Sagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Nir Peleg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Amit Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We can assign a device from the host machine to a guest. The original code comes
from Neocleus.
Also, in the future, pl
Amit Shah wrote:
From: Or Sagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Nir Peleg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Amit Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We can assign a device from the host machine to a guest. The original code comes
from Neocleus.
A new command-line optio
Bugs item #1981866, was opened at 2008-06-02 11:24
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1981866&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
On Friday 30 May 2008 23:00:41 Farkas Levente wrote:
> this is out production server at the development department (10-15)
> people using it so actually if i tell them that i'll stop the host and
> all guests for max an hour it's acceptable, but more not really. it's
> run it type programs. from my
On Monday 02 June 2008 12:48:50 Han, Weidong wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > The host ethernet driver is to be removed before doing the
> > passthrough.
>
> This operation is rough. Do you have any plan to improve it? For
> example, don't load drivers for the devices which will be assigned to
> gues
Amit Shah wrote:
> From: Or Sagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Nir Peleg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Amit Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> We can assign a device from the host machine to a guest. The original
> code comes
> from Neocleus.
>
> A new
24 matches
Mail list logo
