> The happy theme of today's kvm is the significant performance
> improvements, brought to you by a growing team of developers. I've
> clocked kbuild at within 25% of native. This release also introduces
> support for 32-bit Windows Vista.
>
> Changes from kvm-21:
> - Significant performance impr
Hello,
Now our userspace code is in git repo, and separated from kernel code?
So I think the instruction from http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/HOWTO
is not relevant anymore if we are to compile/install userspace code
(with qemu) from scratch?
I compiled kvm kernel first (kvm22), then pull userspa
Hello,
I've posted patches for two features, kernel shared memory and Atomic Code
Execution, which I believe can be used to implement para-virtualized devices.
Could someone recommend a device that might make a good proof
of concept? I was thinking may be a block device.
Any suggestions and addit
> >
> > Trusted code should only be allowed access to the feature, at the moment
> > it is enforced by requiring the applications to have root permissions to
> > open the character device driver.
>
> This is a serious problem. There is a reason why we normally do things
> with system calls. Unless
> -Original Message-
> From: Dor Laor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, 6 May 2007 3:03 PM
> To: Steven Wilton; kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [kvm-devel] System time issues - 64 bit guest
>
> >I've got a problem where my guest VM's system clock is very
> inaccura
On Sunday 06 May 2007, Wink Saville wrote:
> >
> > > Thus code
> > > +executing within the ACE area can also be executed from user space or
> > > +kernel space. This is accomplished by using spin locks when executing
> > > +within the ACE area and changes to arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S such that
> >
On 5/6/07, Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 06 May 2007, Wink Saville wrote:
> > +Atomic Code Execution (ACE) allows code to execute as if it was
> > +surrounded by spin_lock_irqsave and spin_unlock_irqrestore without
> > +requiring actual access to the processor flags register.
Bugs item #1713790, was opened at 2007-05-06 12:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1713790&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Mark Ryden wrote:
> Thanks, Avi.
>
> I thought that this kvmfs is somehow connected to
> "a synthetic file system that can be used to control one or more KVM
> virtual machines running on a computer."
>
> see:
> http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2007/view_abstract.php?content_key=102
>
> I assume there
Thanks, Avi.
I thought that this kvmfs is somehow connected to
"a synthetic file system that can be used to control one or more KVM
virtual machines running on a computer."
see:
http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2007/view_abstract.php?content_key=102
I assume there is no connection between your kvm
On Sunday 06 May 2007, Wink Saville wrote:
> +Atomic Code Execution (ACE) allows code to execute as if it was
> +surrounded by spin_lock_irqsave and spin_unlock_irqrestore without
> +requiring actual access to the processor flags register.
I guess you mean spin_{un,}lock_irq here, right? The save/
Mark Ryden wrote:
> Hi,
> Could anybody tell a few sentences anout kvmfs: what is it for ?
> I did not find anything in the FAQ; googling for it did not give a valuable
>
It's a pseudo filesystem for generating inodes; it's just glue to get
things working; it has no specific functionality.
I'
Hi,
Could anybody tell a few sentences anout kvmfs: what is it for ?
I did not find anything in the FAQ; googling for it did not give a valuable
info either.
Mark
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Ex
The happy theme of today's kvm is the significant performance
improvements, brought to you by a growing team of developers. I've
clocked kbuild at within 25% of native. This release also introduces
support for 32-bit Windows Vista.
Changes from kvm-21:
- Significant performance improvements (
Linus,
Please pull from the repository and branch
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/avi/kvm.git for-linus
to receive the pending kvm updates for 2.6.22. The changes increase
the range of guests we support, improve performance, fix various bugs,
and improve the userspace interface
Matthew Gregan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attempting to boot the default 'bsd' kernel of OpenBSD 4.1 i386 in a guest
> fails early in the kernel init inside p3_get_bus_clock while trying to read
> the IA32_EBL_CR_POWERON MSR. KVM logs an 'unhandled MSR' message and the
> guest kernel faults.
>
> This patch
David Abrahams wrote:
>>
>>> A subsequent reboot went much faster. Wow, the virtual machine really
>>> blazes now! Wish I'd known about that earlier, thanks!
>>>
>>>
>> Looks like something the wiki wants to know about too.
>>
>
> It doesn't seem all that easy to find some thi
David Abrahams wrote:
>>
>>> A subsequent reboot went much faster. Wow, the virtual machine really
>>> blazes now! Wish I'd known about that earlier, thanks!
>>>
>>>
>> Looks like something the wiki wants to know about too.
>>
>
> Seems like it's already there:
> http://kvm.qu
Gregory Haskins wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2007 at 2:57 PM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Nakajima, Jun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> This sounds good, but when will this get incorporated in the tree?
>>
>> The reason I'm asking is that I've got X64 Vista up on KVM as
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> The following is my kernel side patch series for adding in-kernel APIC logic.
> By default, the code enters "level-0" mode and should be compatible with
> existing userspace. I have a patch series for userspace which enables
> "level-1" mode which I will forward after this
>I've got a problem where my guest VM's system clock is very inaccurate.
>The
>host computer is running 4 guest VM's, 2 32-bit Linux (Debian Sarge), 1
>Windows XP and 1 64 bit Linux (Debian Etch).
>
>The problem I have is that the system clock on the 64 bit Deabin Etch
VM is
>always either running
21 matches
Mail list logo
