Jorge Lucángeli Obes wrote:
> Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit guest: hangs during boot.
> *Command line:
> -net nic,model=8139 -m 512 -localtime
> *Nothing in dmesg besides processor 1 inicialization SIPI messages
> *Still hangs during boot with 'no-kvm-irqchip'
>
>
Can you double-check that you
He, Qing wrote:
>
> You can try the attached patch to see if it works
>
Ouch. Applied, thanks.
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *He, Qing
> *Sent:* 2007年9月10日 10:55
> *To:* Zhao, Yunf
He, Qing wrote:
> resended, due to wrong attachment
>
>
Patch looks good, but needs a changelog comment and a signoff.
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of He, Qing
>> Sent: 2007年9月10日 13:59
>> To: Avi Kivity
>> Cc: kvm-devel@lists.s
Joseph Wolff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting "unhandled vm exit:0xb8002" running a Debian Etch guest
> under kvm36 on AMD64.
>
>
This is a badly reported emulation failure.
Is there anything in dmesg like "emulation failed but !mmio_needed?"?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many argume
As with Take 1 of this patch, its purpose is to expose host CPU features to
guests. It proved rather helpful to KVM in various benchmarks, and it should
similarly speed kqemu up. Note that it does not extend the set of emulated
opcodes, only exposes what's supported by the host CPU.
I changed the
KVM: fix apic timer migration when inactive
When local apic timer is inactive or is expired in one shot mode, it should not
be restarted on vcpu and hrtimer migration. This patch fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Qing He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>-Origina
He, Qing wrote:
As discussed previously, this patch directly passes SMP CPU count to the
guest BIOS from CMOS by qemu, instead of sending SIPI and wait. CMOS
offset 0x7f is used.
This is the last functional piece for in-kernel APIC merge in kvm-37.
Signed-off-by: Qing He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dif
Get two warning messages while compiling 32bit kvm.ko.
CC [M] /workspace/tmp/37/kvm-37/kernel/lapic.o
CC [M] /workspace/tmp/37/kvm-37/kernel/ioapic.o
CC [M] /workspace/tmp/37/kvm-37/kernel/preempt.o
LD [M] /workspace/tmp/37/kvm-37/kernel/kvm.o
LD [M] /workspace/tmp/37/kvm-37/kernel
Bugs item #1791444, was opened at 2007-09-10 16:43
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1791444&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> Get two warning messages while compiling 32bit kvm.ko.
>
> CC [M] /workspace/tmp/37/kvm-37/kernel/lapic.o
> CC [M] /workspace/tmp/37/kvm-37/kernel/ioapic.o
> CC [M] /workspace/tmp/37/kvm-37/kernel/preempt.o
> LD [M] /workspace/tmp/37/kvm-37/kernel/kvm.o
> LD [M
I am using 2.6.22 kernel.
>>
>
>What host kernel are you using? I don't see this on 2.6.23-rc3.
>
>> WARNING: "__divdi3" [/workspace/tmp/37/kvm-37/kernel/kvm.ko]
undefined!
>>
>>
>
>This one is already fixed in kvm.git.
>
>
>--
>error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
---
Bugs item #1791448, was opened at 2007-09-10 16:54
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1791448&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 14:05:13 +0300
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> This release merges the pic/lapic/ioapic into mainline. While some
>> known issues exist, we're now at the point where it's better to get
>> some wider exposure rather than keep it alone on a branch.
>>
>> So
On 9/10/07, Dong, Eddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 14:05:13 +0300
> > Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >> This release merges the pic/lapic/ioapic into mainline. While some
> >> known issues exist, we're now at the point where it's better to get
> >> some
Le 10/09/07, Gildas<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Hi Avi,
>
> I had the same problem on a laptop with Core2 T7200 @ 2.00GHz
> running ubuntu with kernel 2.6.20
>
> Going in the kvm-37 source directory and applying the patch with
>
> patch -p1
> fixed the compilation problem for me but the VM
The patch fixes build problems, however the modules won't load properly,
I don't know if this is a seperate issue or not.
kernel is ubuntu feisty 2.6.20-16-generic
$sudo modprobe kvm-intel
WARNING: Error inserting kvm
(/lib/modules/2.6.20-16-generic/extra/kvm.ko): Unknown symbol in module,
or u
On 9/10/07, Pelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch fixes build problems, however the modules won't load properly,
> I don't know if this is a seperate issue or not.
>
> kernel is ubuntu feisty 2.6.20-16-generic
>
> $sudo modprobe kvm-intel
> WARNING: Error inserting kvm
> (/lib/modules/2.6.20
Using kvm-37, I was able to install a debian guest using
debian-40r0-i386-DVD-1.iso, and run it, on both AMD and Intel machine.
My hosts are both running Fedora 7 with linux kernel versions 2.6.21-1
and 2.6.23-rc3.
Does your guest boot when adding '-no-kvm' to the command line ?
Uri.
Joseph
Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> Alternative patch attached, but works only with -no-kvm-irqchip.
>
>
After removing smp_processor_id() from kvm_vcpu_kick() it works fairly
well, unfortunately that means there's a timing issue with kernel lapic.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to functi
Hi Avi,
I had the same problem on a laptop with Core2 T7200 @ 2.00GHz
running ubuntu with kernel 2.6.20
Going in the kvm-37 source directory and applying the patch with
patch -p1 f0 53 ff 00 f0 53 ff 00 f0 53 ff 00 f0 53 ff 00 f0
53 ff 00 f0 53 ff 00 f0 53 ff 00 f0 a5 fe 00 f0 87 e9 00 f0 5
Hi, Avi
The issue still exists on the latest kvm-userspace.git.
Did you push the change to master?
Thanks
Yunfeng
>-Original Message-
>From: Avi Kivity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 2007年9月10日 15:24
>To: He, Qing
>Cc: Zhao, Yunfeng; kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [kvm-de
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> Hi, Avi
> The issue still exists on the latest kvm-userspace.git.
> Did you push the change to master?
>
Pushed now, thanks for the remainder.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
I can compile latest kvm.git as external modules of 2.6.22 kernel
successfully.
But I cannot insert kvm.ko.
It failed with the error:
kvm: Unknown symbol genapic
thanks
Yunfeng
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> I can compile latest kvm.git as external modules of 2.6.22 kernel
> successfully.
> But I cannot insert kvm.ko.
> It failed with the error:
> kvm: Unknown symbol genapic
>
>
Is this on i386 or x86_64?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
It's on x86_64.
Thanks
Yunfeng
>-Original Message-
>From: Avi Kivity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 2007年9月10日 23:15
>To: Zhao, Yunfeng
>Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] kvm: Unknown symbol genapic
>
>Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
>> I can compile latest kvm.git as e
hi,
for those of you who can't wait for the centos testing rpms i recompile
a few packages for centos-5:
https://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/
there's no support for it and the centos repositories are always better
then these packages:-)
--
Levente "Si v
Dor Laor wrote:
> I just tested it, it got a little deprecated over time since it call
> pci_module_init instead of pci_register_* and some more irq function
> deprecation.The sysfs interface in not complete and you can't read/write
> from the device.
> The qemu parameters are -vmchannel di:2258
Wassup Dima
My wife complains about my small cock ALL THE TIME!
Xiahui Linnemann
http://lxpeople.com/
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:49:02 +0200
"Jindrich Makovicka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/10/07, Dong, Eddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > div64_32 is enough, does this function exist?
>
> afaik, __div64_32 is architecture specific, but do_div() could be
> actually used here.
This version shoul
Here's the dmesg snippet from the run:
[47823.616622] device tap0 entered promiscuous mode
[47823.616633] audit(1189441272.489:14): dev=tap0 prom=256 old_prom=0
auid=4294967295
[47823.616638] br0: port 2(tap0) entering learning state
[47830.252510] pf_interception: emulate fail
[47830.308439] br
Paul Brook wrote:
> > > What you really want to do is ask your virtualization module what
> > > features it supports.
> >
> > Yes, that needs to be an additional filter.
>
> I'd have thought that would be the *only* interesting set for autodetection.
If that means the same as the features which a
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> It's on x86_64.
>
> Thanks
> Yunfeng
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Avi Kivity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 2007年9月10日 23:15
>> To: Zhao, Yunfeng
>> Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] kvm: Unknown symbol genapic
>>
>> Zhao, Yu
Hi,
Please CC me, I'm not a subscriber to the list.
I have a Debian unstable 64bit host on an intel S3000 quad core xeon
X3210. Kernel 2.6.22-2-amd64 (debian flavour) and KVM28 and KVM36.
Linux guests run very well.
I installed Win2003 EE SP2 with --no-kvm, and disabled ACPI in the
windows se
This issue is fixed by Qing's patch to hrtimer migration yesterday, but it is
not in yet given that the comments is not properly in.
Eddie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gildas
Sent: 2007年9月10日 18:15
To: Avi Kivity
Cc: kvm-devel
Subject
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Avi Kivity
>Sent: 2007年9月10日 20:48
>To: He, Qing
>Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] passing smp cpu count from CMOS
>
>Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> Alternative patch att
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 14:05:13 +0300
Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This release merges the pic/lapic/ioapic into mainline. While some
> known issues exist, we're now at the point where it's better to get
> some wider exposure rather than keep it alone on a branch.
>
> Some regressions a
On 2007-09-08, 14:59 GMT, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> The above move by RedHat is a bit confusing... what can Xen do
> that KVM cannot?. In other words, why should anyone even bother
> with Xen with KVM around ??. I've read Xen is "more robust"
> because it has a "one year lead" over KVM. But real
On 9/10/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jorge Lucángeli Obes wrote:
> > Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit guest: hangs during boot.
> > *Command line:
> > -net nic,model=8139 -m 512 -localtime
> > *Nothing in dmesg besides processor 1 inicialization SIPI messages
> > *Still hangs during boo
38 matches
Mail list logo
