[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi,
> i'm just try kvm-45. for me it still unusable, so switch back
> to kvm-36:-(
> setup:
> - host: centos-5 x86-64 (4 core, 8gb ram)
> - guest:
> - centos-5 i386 4 cpu, 2gb
> - centos-5 x86-64 4 cpu, 1gb
> - mandrake-9 i586 2 cpu, 1gb
> - winxp 32bit1
Dong, Eddie wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> hi,
>> i'm just try kvm-45. for me it still unusable, so switch back
>> to kvm-36:-(
>> setup:
>> - host: centos-5 x86-64 (4 core, 8gb ram)
>> - guest:
>> - centos-5 i386 4 cpu, 2gb
>> - centos-5 x86-64 4 cpu, 1gb
>> - mandrake-9 i586 2 cpu, 1gb
guests are using 2.6.9, 2.6.16, and 2.6.23 kernels.
Thanks
Yunfeng
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Farkas Levente
>Sent: 2007年10月9日 14:45
>To: Dong, Eddie
>Cc: kvm-devel
>Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-45 problems
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
> Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP linux guest and one UP
> windows guest, and booting 4 UP linux guests.
> The first two cases have no problem in our testing.
> And booting 4 UP linux guests
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
>> We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
>> Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP linux guest and one UP
>> windows guest, and booting 4 UP linux guests.
>> The first two cases have no problem in our testing.
>> And b
Farkas Levente wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
>>
>>> We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
>>> Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP linux guest and one UP
>>> windows guest, and booting 4 UP linux guests.
>>> The first two case
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Farkas Levente wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
>>>
We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP linux guest and one UP
windows guest, and booting 4 UP linux gue
Farkas Levente wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Farkas Levente wrote:
>>
>>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>>>
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
> Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP l
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
>
>> We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
>> Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP linux guest and one UP
>> windows guest, and booting 4 UP linux guests.
>> The first two cases have no problem in our testing.
>>
>> This may be due to NMIs or MCEs. Is it possible your machine is
>> receiving them?
>>
>
>
>I pushed a fix for the NMI issue. Can you check if it fixes your hangs?
[Yunfeng] Sure, the result will be available tomorrow.
>
>
>--
>error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
---
x24a/0x25c
[] sys_ioctl+0x48/0x5f
[] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>-Original Message-
>From: Avi Kivity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 2007年10月9日 18:19
>To: Zhao, Yunfeng
>Cc: kvm-devel
>Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-45 problems
>
>Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Zhao, Y
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
>> This fix cannot resolve this issue.
>> Against latest kvm commits, SMP linux with 4 vcpus still cannot boot up.
>> But the issue will not happen , if adding "-smp4 -no-acpi".
>>
>
> Can you try the attached patch?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> This fix cannot resolve this issue.
> Against latest kvm commits, SMP linux with 4 vcpus still cannot boot up.
> But the issue will not happen , if adding "-smp4 -no-acpi".
>
Can you try the attached patch?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to functi
-devel
>Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-45 problems
>
>Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
>>
>>> We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
>>> Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP linux guest and one UP
>windows gues
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> Hi,Avi
> With latest kvm commits, the SMP linux guests causes host soft lock issues
> can not be reproduced on my machine.
> Have you fixed it?
>
>
Not intentionally...
Maybe the rmap fix is somehow responsible.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they
15 matches
Mail list logo