not understand your files (bad, hopefully fixed)
-- I tested single words by the command -d sursilvan.
Thanks for your help.
Maria
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 11:50:13 +0200
From: pesce...@apache.org
To: l10n@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellchecker for Rhaeto-Romanic
On 06/09/2014 Maria Hartmann
afterwards. ;)
Best regards,
Maria
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 15:30:24 +0200
From: pesce...@apache.org
To: l10n@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellchecker for Rhaeto-Romanic
On 07/09/2014 Maria Hartmann wrote:
here is the link to the updated version.
https://www.dropbox.com/s
Ah, I forgot, I got some informations to the hunspell engine and wrote it
today. Thanks.
On 05/09/2014 Maria Hartmann wrote:
I have still some problems with my spell checker. It is now possible
to choose him for the spell checking but no word is identiefied
correctly. ...
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ognv53u56a085v2/rm_CH.oxt?dl=0
Is your problem with the extension
the problem is.
Regards,
Maria
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 20:49:29 +0200
From: pesce...@apache.org
To: l10n@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellchecker for Rhaeto-Romanic
On 06/09/2014 Maria Hartmann wrote:
if your output is so wrong, the aff file is maybe the source.
Yes. It seems just
I have still some problems with my spell checker. It is now possible to choose
him for the spell checking but no word is identiefied correctly. I dont expect
that everything is correctly identified because there will be words or
compounded words my spell checker doesnt know, but there are words
...
Regards,
Maria
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:13:32 +0200
From: pesce...@apache.org
To: l10n@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellchecker for Rhaeto-Romanic
On 31/08/2014 Maria Hartmann wrote:
What would happen, if somebody writes a spell checker for another
dialect and takes the ISO
...@apache.org
To: l10n@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellchecker for Rhaeto-Romanic
On 18/08/2014 Maria Hartmann wrote:
Thanks a lot for your tips - it looks much better know, because the
name of the extension and the publishers name is shown in the
extension manager.
Hello Maria, thanks
On 31/08/2014 Maria Hartmann wrote:
Oh no, I suspected something like that... Sursilvan has no ISO Code,
the only code I came across was in the Registry Of Dialects (ROD)
Code:16069.
We only implement ISO codes as document languages, or so I believe. So
you will have to use the generic rm
-Romanic
On 16/08/2014 Maria Hartmann wrote:
Okay. I am using windows 7 and OpenOffice 4.
Ok, good to know.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6chp8mwr4451j4q/roh_SUR.oxt
I see the most classic mistake there: Our (insane) convention is that
your files should NOT be inside a folder. So, your
, so
they also arent used in this version.
Sorry for the german comments. ;)
Thanks you,
Maria
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 21:06:04 +0200
From: pesce...@apache.org
To: l10n@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellchecker for Rhaeto-Romanic
On 15/08/2014 Maria Hartmann wrote:
Exactly, now
I
: pesce...@apache.org
To: l10n@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellchecker for Rhaeto-Romanic
On 12/08/2014 Maria Hartmann wrote:
Good morning,
the proofing tool gui is no help, sadly.
I had understood that what you wanted to do is maintenance and checks on
a dictionary, so that you had
In the edit-a-word-window, what do I have to write in the line tags?
The screenshot on the website
http://marcoagpinto.cidadevirtual.pt/proofingtoolgui.html called this line
flags.
Hello dear OpenOffice-Community,
I am new here and english isnt my first language, but i try to ask my question
about the affixfile development for a Rhaeto-Romanic spellchecker.
Rhaeto-Romanic has 5 varieties. To write a spellchecker for Sursilvan, one of
the varieties, is the topic of my
14 matches
Mail list logo
