Re: [lace] I've got it

2008-09-03 Thread Clive & Betty Rice
or you and your John. Luv and Happy Lacemaking, Betty Ann in Roanoke, Virginia USA = From: Carol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2008/09/03 Wed PM 02:10:30 EDT To: Clive & Betty Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, lace@arachne.com Subject: Re: [lace] I've got it Hi Betty, I

Re: [lace] I've got it

2008-09-03 Thread Carol
- Original Message - From: "Clive & Betty Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 8:01 PM Subject: [lace] I've got it OK, OK, for the dozens (g) of you who privately and on list corrected me, I *do* know the difference between the magnif

Re: [lace] I've got it

2008-09-02 Thread Sue Duckles
Ha Ha so have I Betty!! I got one today! (thanks to all the 'explanations') Sue in EY On 2 Sep 2008, at 20:01, Clive & Betty Rice wrote: OK, OK, for the dozens (g) of you who privately and on list corrected me, I *do* know the difference between the magnifier I have and the monocle us

Re: [lace] I've got it

2008-09-02 Thread rosemary hemmett
Hi Betty We are only trying to be helpful (VBG) Happy Lacing Rosemary Clive & Betty Rice wrote: OK, OK, for the dozens (g) of you who privately and on list corrected me, I *do* know the difference between the magnifier I have and the monocle used by jewelers! At the time I sent the postin

[lace] I've got it

2008-09-02 Thread Clive & Betty Rice
OK, OK, for the dozens (g) of you who privately and on list corrected me, I *do* know the difference between the magnifier I have and the monocle used by jewelers! At the time I sent the posting, I plainly said that I didn't know why I called it a "jewelers loop" or whatever. I *did* also desc