Can someone point me for good VRRPD (rfc2338) implementation on linux.
Some stable and live project
Thanks
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Monday, December 09, 2002, 11:16:24 PM, you wrote:
SSp> Morten Isaksen wrote:
>> We are running with an 8 Mbit WAN link and are using wrr to shape the
>> traffic between 800 users. This works fine and all the bandwith are en
>> use most of the time.
SSp> Sorry to break in to the thread like this,
Hi Stef!
> > I'll let HTB to automatically compute the values for 'burst' and
> > 'cburst'. The problem is elsewhere. What are the correct values for
> > 'rate' and 'ceil' of 11:2 class in this case? In fact, total value of
> > 'ceil's from all sub-classes exceeds 5000Kbit, so there are moments wh
> -Original Message-
> From: Steen Suder, privat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 9. december 2002 22:16
> To: Morten Isaksen
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth
>
> Morten Isaksen wrote:
> > We are running with an 8 Mbit WAN link and are using wrr to shape
the
> > t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stef Coene wrote:
|
| Yes : child ceil <= ceil of parent (I just added it to the faq page)
|
| Stef
|
So far, so good. But what if I want to give my clients a little more
bandwidth than (parent ceil) / (no. of clients)?
Let's suppose that I have 10 c
> | rate of parent You don't have to follow this rules, but the final
> | shaping result can be strange.
> | See the faq page on www.docum.org.
>
> I've already seen it :-) But it doesn't say anything like:
> sum (child ceils) <= ceil of parent
> Is there such a rule?
Yes : child ceil <= ce
Morten Isaksen wrote:
We are running with an 8 Mbit WAN link and are using wrr to shape the
traffic between 800 users. This works fine and all the bandwith are en
use most of the time.
Sorry to break in to the thread like this, but...
1. Is it one single 8/8Mb link?
2. Hows the tc configuration
We are running with an 8 Mbit WAN link and are using wrr to shape the
traffic between 800 users. This works fine and all the bandwith are en
use most of the time.
Please supply some more details of your configuration, if you want more
help.
--
Morten Isaksen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.aub.dk/
You need to ensure that you are downloading from a server
capable of serving 8Mbits (most are not).
In the continental USA I use gatekeeper.dec.com,
which is very lightly loaded (nobody remembers it these
days) and has at least an OC-3 connection.
I have seen 40Mbits/s via FTP from this machine.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stef Coene wrote:
| On Monday 09 December 2002 18:14, Catalin Bucur wrote:
|
|>Let's say that my ISP gives me 5000Kbit guaranteed bandwidth. I'm
|>starting a HTB traffic shape like this:
|>
|>tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 11: htb default 99
|>tc c
I am really curious how loaded (current and average upload/download speed) is your
network
and how fast connection you have.
(This question is more for more networked enviroments rather than single users).
We just bought 8mbit/s line and the load wont get higher than 200KB/s (~1.6Mbit/s)
(accor
Helio,
: some address while some others not. Using tcpdump, I can see icmp
: packets arriving, but no response from the server. Resetting switch
: works for some time, allowing all IP to be reachable, but after a time
: (minutes, hours or, even, days) some IPs just stops.
Stop rig
Hi list,
I'm asking here because it is last resource. I already tried a lot of
configurations and I really don't know how to solve this problem.
I installed a Linux box (Debian 3.0, kernel 2.4.19) with 4 network
interfaces:
eth0 with 192.168/24 address (intranet);
On Monday 09 December 2002 19:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am shaping traffic for ~250 users and i have noticed something is wrong:
> Each user is being shaped from 32kbit/s to 2mbit/s.
>
> When i run the script which creates the classes the following error is
> printed to syslog:
> Similarly, I don't understand the latency issue. An application that
> cares about latency will not create a large backlog.
I think the problem may be that a TCP flow will create a queue
of packets, behind which all other packets queue. Thus one sees
200ms latency via 'ping'. Of course this is
On Monday 09 December 2002 18:14, Catalin Bucur wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> Let's say that my ISP gives me 5000Kbit guaranteed bandwidth. I'm
> starting a HTB traffic shape like this:
>
> tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 11: htb default 99
> tc class ad
Hello,
I am shaping traffic for ~250 users and i have noticed something is wrong:
Each user is being shaped from 32kbit/s to 2mbit/s.
When i run the script which creates the classes the following error is printed to
syslog:
Dec 9 19:53:34 p1 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10009 is small. Con
Hello all,
I have a few question regarding PRIO and what it is. Is it
used to prioritize what classes get what? I read the how to but it isn't
exactly clear. Also about SFQ. Does this disciplines keep traffic within a
queue fair? for example if I classify all http connections to 1:
On Monday 09 December 2002 15:09, alem wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a newbbie in this kind of things.
>
> I need an example to configure QOS over a WAN for http, telnet and ftp or a
> web-interface aplication to start working with QOS. (such as webmin with
> iptables, but for tc).
I have no real-world
On Monday 09 December 2002 18:11, James Ma wrote:
> Hi, All,
>
> When I use CBQ, what should I put for "avpkt"? I saw all the examples using
> 1000, but if I have a lot of voice packets which are very small, will
> "avpkt 1000" cause any problem?
I'm not sure, but avpkt is used in internal calcula
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Let's say that my ISP gives me 5000Kbit guaranteed bandwidth. I'm
starting a HTB traffic shape like this:
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 11: htb default 99
tc class add dev eth1 parent 11:0 classid 11:1 htb rate 1Kbit burst
ceil 1K
Hi, All,
When I use CBQ, what should I put for "avpkt"? I
saw all the examples using 1000, but if I have a lot of voice packets
which are very small, will "avpkt 1000" cause any problem? Another
thing is, does CBQ support "default" as HTB does (ex: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root
handle 1: htb
Abraham van der Merwe writes:
> Hi Don!
>
> > > I then tried fifos. With small packet fifos the packet loss is just
> > > to great to be of any use and even then the latency is quite high (~200ms).
A small detail: what are "small packet fifos"? You mean fifos that
can only hold a small num
Hi Don!
> > I then tried fifos. With small packet fifos the packet loss is just
> > to great to be of any use and even then the latency is quite high (~200ms).
> You consider 200ms high? One max size packet = 1500 bytes = 12Kbit
> which is about 200ms on a 64Kbit link. You can't expect to do b
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Thomas Jalsovsky wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Vladimir Smelhaus wrote:
>
> > On 9 Dec 2002, 15:52, Thomas Jalsovsky wrote:
> >
> > > I have HTB on IMQ device. My rate does not work as I configured. I
> > > configured 1920kbit/s and I can download only about 290kbit/s (while
>
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Vladimir Smelhaus wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2002, 15:52, Thomas Jalsovsky wrote:
>
> > I have HTB on IMQ device. My rate does not work as I configured. I
> > configured 1920kbit/s and I can download only about 290kbit/s (while
>
> Set your pfifo limit higher. You have too much dropped
On 9 Dec 2002, 15:52, Thomas Jalsovsky wrote:
> I have HTB on IMQ device. My rate does not work as I configured. I
> configured 1920kbit/s and I can download only about 290kbit/s (while
Set your pfifo limit higher. You have too much dropped packets.
> class htb 1:10 parent 1:1 leaf 10: prio 0 q
Hello,
I have HTB on IMQ device. My rate does not work as I configured. I
configured 1920kbit/s and I can download only about 290kbit/s (while it
should be the whole bandwidth).
My script:
/sbin/modprobe imq numdevs=1
/usr/local/sbin/tc qdisc del dev imq0 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null
/u
Dear Guru
I do not know if here is the most apropriated place to send this.
If it is not please send me some good directions.
I am trying to configure a FTP server behind two consecutives packet
filters:
Internet <---> Filter 1 <--> Filter 2 <--> FTP SERVER
At Filter 1 I have:
INET_IFACE=
Hi all,
I'm a newbbie in this kind of things.
I need an example to configure QOS over a WAN
for http, telnet and ftp or a web-interface aplication to start working with
QOS. (such as webmin with iptables, but for tc).
Thanks in advance
Alem.
Kuba,
I post this message also to the LARTC mailinglist (www.lartc.org).
> So I have 2 working configurations limiting traffic coming from LAN.
>
> - First is marking incoming packets and tbf queue on the outgoing
> interface ?
>
> - Second is something like this:
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent f
31 matches
Mail list logo
