grr, I thought i had checked everything close. Thanks =)
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
You have a typo :- kpbs
Also, it seems that the parent 1:1 is not created yet.
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Wineinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> However, I get an error about illegal rate when I try to create a class
> with:
> $TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate
I would be glad if someone could point me where can I get the traffic
data on Linux, preferrably on the '/proc' file system. Studying data
based on a device in total is not sufficient for me.
I would like to do a measurement of the qdisc's which I implemented to
check how effective they are, much
On Thursday, 23 January 2003, at 09:13:10 +,
Doug Kingston wrote:
> It turns out that the bonding driver does indeed handle interface
> redundancy to two separate switches. Martin was right and the kernel
> documentation file (networking/bonding.txt) is packed full of useful
>
All I have
Hi,
Ive been looking at tinkering with the linux traffic control stuff
lately and decided to try out the htb qdisc. My setup is as follows:
2 interfaces: eth0 goes to internet, and eth1 goes to a NAT'd subnet. eth0
has a 7mbit link, but only a 4.5 mbit link to the internet while eth1 is a
100
We are ISP and we give Internet Wireless Outdoor Service . The Base Station
works in 802.11b and it is connected with a Linux Mandrake Server that make
NAT.
Besides the linux Server limit the bandwidth of each Wireless Client, per
IP, using an aplication called Traffic Control with CBQ rules. The
Hi.
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Thursday 23 January 2003 00:58, Mihai RUSU wrote:
> Hi Stef
>
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Stef Coene wrote:
> > So the quantum errors are gone?
>
> Yes, thanks again for the tips
>
> > > Help ? :)
> >
> > A htb qdisc attached to a htb class is useless and will only eat cpu
> > cycles.
> >
> > Stef
>
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Stef Coene wrote:
> If it works, fine for you. It's just not something I would advice :)
> But why not delete the root qdisc and recreate it?
>
> Stef
All started when we observed that in the meantime (the time between tc
qdisc del and the time it takes to recreate the whole
On Thursday 23 January 2003 17:34, kpeter wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would like to know, how the Token Bucket filter really works.
>
> An example:
> r = 10 Kbyte/sec
> b = 10 Kbyte
Do you mean burst ?
> I send 0.5 sec with 5 Kbyte/sec (A-> 2,5 Kbyte) and
> 0.5 sec with 15 Kbyte/sec (B-> 7,5 Kbyte),
found it, the old good pfifo ;-) (10x alex)
-- Nikolay Datchev
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Nikolay Datchev wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Anybody knows how to limit not kbits per second but packets per second ?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> -- Nikolay Datchev
>
> ___
>
Hello all,
Anybody knows how to limit not kbits per second but packets per second ?
Thanks in advance
-- Nikolay Datchev
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hello!
I would like to know, how the Token Bucket filter really works.
An example:
r = 10 Kbyte/sec
b = 10 Kbyte
I send 0.5 sec with 5 Kbyte/sec (A-> 2,5 Kbyte) and
0.5 sec with 15 Kbyte/sec (B-> 7,5 Kbyte), and
0.5 sec with 10 Kbyte/sec (C-> 5 Kbyte)
after each other: ABCABCABC... and it goes
Hi All,
this is not exactly Linux problem but it is VERY interesting
and as I'm linux developer I'm posting it here.
Situation:
Win2k, workstation (service packs unknown at the moment as
I have no access to it) connecting via FTP to Linux 2.4.18.
We tried several programs at w2k, both clients and
I must admit I've never seen a completly satisfying solution.
There are lots of building blocks out there, but few complete solutions.
- ntop with the rrdtool plugin should do nice.
- Netramet is great at accounting.
- flowscan reports netflow info through rrdtool graphics.
- Caida sums up a few s
I'd like to set up HTB to share a bandwith equally between machines.
This is my situation:
. +-- Clients (1.2.3.140-147)
.[eth1]
Internet -- [comx0] router [br0] --+
.[eth0]
.
It turns out that the bonding driver does indeed handle interface
redundancy to two separate switches. Martin was right and the kernel
documentation file (networking/bonding.txt) is packed full of useful
information. The specific section that deals with what I need is under
the heading "High
> > from 19050914, cnt 46210654
> > from 68514564, cnt 4855808
> > at 68518659 (by 4095) in f2
> >
> > "at" block is where the block was found in other file.
>
> Uff. ;) I give up, I don't remember seeing anything like this. I would
> do one tcpdump at the sender and another at the receiv
18 matches
Mail list logo