Hi,
I tried to make IMQ device to work... So I patched the kernel, patched iptables,
made all the stuff, boot to new kernel was ok, module imq was there and it was
ok to load it and 'ip link imq0 up' also worked and imq0 was present in ifconfig
listing. Unitil imq0 was inactive everything was clear
On Tuesday 09 September 2003 09:42, Mitsuru MIZUTANI wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I am using CBQ.init to shape bandwidth but I have a problem.
> Linux PC2 (192.168.0.10)
> +-+
> |eth0 192.168.0.1 | ← Linux router
>
Hello everyone,
I am using CBQ.init to shape bandwidth but I have a problem.
Linux PC2 (192.168.0.10)
|
+-+
|eth0 192.168.0.1 | ← Linux router
|--
Hey guys,
Im going to be setting up a qos system for the college I attend and I
had some questions. First, the box will be a transparent bridge and I would
like to prioritize traffic (3 class/types only, [interactive, web+mail+etc,
bulk]) and also limit single ips to specified up/down speeds.
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 10:09, Remus wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to know if IMQ (http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/) is going to be
> ported to the 2.6 kernel or there is something else?
I just took a quick look at the imq patch and I don't think it's difficult to
port it to 2.6. As far
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 06:59, Nimit Gupta wrote:
> Yeah its for a short period but it keeps happening, I mean it will reach
> to 48Kbit and then after few sec it will stablize at 24Kbit then again
> it will reach to 48 and this repeats.
>
> can you explain how to calculate burst rates for b
On Sunday 07 September 2003 05:25, Yves Bergeron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my scenario
>
> I have a 100mbit for 400 routes and the rest of Internet is at 2mbit
>
> #
> #1:1
> # / \
> #1:2 1:12
> # / \
> # 1:10 1:11
>
>
> t
Hello Aldrovando,
This is a not uncommon problem.
: I have the following situation to handle: a linux box is a firewall
: and router of my internal network (192.168.1.0/24). This firewall is
: connected to the net through two network cards that connect to two
: different gateways. A picture
On Monday, 08 September 2003, at 11:50:53 -,
vadiraj c s wrote:
> I need information on source-based-routing in detail. Please
> help in getting this to me as soon as possible.
>
As you are in a hurry, run to http://lartc.org. Period.
--
Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
Linux Registered User #189
Vadiraj,
:I need information on source-based-routing in detail. Please
: help in getting this to me as soon as possible.
Do you mean policy-based routing, or do you *really* mean source-based
routing?
If you mean policy-based routing, there are a number of resources you will
find helpful:
Hi,
I have the following situation to handle: a linux box is a firewall and router
of my internal network (192.168.1.0/24). This firewall is connected to the net
through two network cards that connect to two different gateways. A picture of
the situation is the following:
Well, I don't think its the cisco's problem. I think there is something
wrong with my linux routing config , here it is:
/proc/sys/net/ipv4
icmp_echo_ignore_all:0
icmp_echo_ignore_broadcasts:0
icmp_ignore_bogus_error_responses:0
icmp_ratelimit:100
icmp_ratemask:6168
igmp_max_memberships:20
inet
Hi,
I was reviewing the patch Patrick McHardy has contributed to squid QoS
features (http://trash.net/~kaber/squid-qos/), and decided to do something
similar which could classify client side traffic based on whether SQUID's
response is a cache HIT or a cache MISS. I think I got it working. I made
Hi all,
I need information on source-based-routing in detail. Please
help in getting this to me as soon as possible.
vadiraj cs
deeprootlinux ltd
bangalore
___
Medicine meets Marketing; Dr. Swati Weds Jayaram.
Rediff Matchmaker strikes another
14 matches
Mail list logo
