Re: [LARTC] tc filter for vlan id?

hi wolfgang, yes you can ... setup an iptables rule to mark packets depending on the the interface -- eth0.1 == 0x1 eth0.2 == 0x2 you can then setup a traffic policy based on the marked packets. cheers charles On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 13:12, Wolfgang Schmid wrote: Hello I want to use vlans

Re: [LARTC] QoS with Artifficial Intelligence

My idea is to set up a daemon to run QoS on linux, with a particularity, add some A.I. capabilities to our system and hence, be able to change QoS topology every certain time to obtain the maximum performance. I first want to teach the system which parameters should i vary, and hence i would like

Re: [LARTC] jdg-qos-script on FC3

bryan wrote: Hello, Has anyone had any luck compiling Alexander's QOS script on a vanilla FC3 or FC2 box? I just cant seem to get the darn thing to port right. I'm not using FC anything, but I found some problems using kernel 2.6 which I posted a fix to quite a while back. Basically the

[LARTC] Test mail

Test mail ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] iptables tc - 3 marks

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 el Diumenge 19 Desembre 2004 20:32, Brian J. Murrell va escriure: On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 00:12 -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Help me please!!! I am using Linux Redhat as router of the my network. I am to making NAT and firewall.

[LARTC] How can I discern egress traffic than ingress traffic?

I have two interfaces, eth0 and eth1 but i can't discern the egress traffic than ingress traffic. I need to apply htb qdisc in both directions, and I read that I need the IMQ patch to do this, because in ingress qdisc i can't apply htb qdisc...but where is the ingress qdisc? affect the traffic

Re: [LARTC] Test mail

Amit Vyas schrieb: Test mail Approved. -- PGP-ID 0xF8EAF138 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [LARTC] QoS with Artifficial Intelligence

I'm guessing the AI bit is a simplified way of expressing what they're after. AI, per se, is meaningless, because it's undefined. What I -think- they want to do is examine the current behaviour of the traffic, anticipate how it is going to behave next, set the QoS to match that expectation, and

[LARTC] Load Balance Outbound AND Inbound Internet Traffic to one location over multiple links

I've read through the nano documentation, and it says that it wont handle scenarios where the main traffic is input. Also, I've read through the linuxvirtualserver documentation, and i dont think that applies to me either, as that set up intercepts traffic and manipulates the final destination IP

Re: Re: [LARTC] HTB High CPU Utilization

or example, let's say you have 2000kbit of total bandwidth for output and that you are running both and http and an ftp server. Now let's say that you have two users that want to connect to your machine and that both of them can potentially use all of your output bandwidth. One of them want to

Re: [LARTC] QoS with Artifficial Intelligence

I'm not sure what you mean by AI. I suppose you could mean that you're going to feed various QoS parameters into a neural net and teach the neural net to vary the parameters according to conditions... but somehow I think it unlikely that this is what you mean. What is the specific situation

Re: [LARTC] How can I discern egress traffic than ingress traffic?

Santi Anton wrote: I have two interfaces, eth0 and eth1 but i can't discern the egress traffic than ingress traffic. I need to apply htb qdisc in both directions, and I read that I need the IMQ patch to do this, because in ingress qdisc i can't apply htb qdisc...but where is the ingress

[LARTC] Weighted packet shaping?

Hi all, Im new to all this, and am still trying to get my head qround some of the concepts of how this all works. Ive read the howto's, man pages etc. Ive setup packet shaping on my router/server box using HTB and SFQ, but its not working the way i would like. Im after shaping that has weights

Re: [LARTC] FW: differing rate and ceil values

Shaun wrote: Hello all, when running tc -s -d class show dev eth, the parent class rate and ceil are different to the configuration? his is the first time I have used HTB so I may have made some basic mistakes. Thanks in advance Shaun If you do the math, 760/95 = 8 There are 8 bits

Re: [LARTC] What is wrong here?

George Alexandru Dragoi wrote: Hello Everyone, I have this weird problem. I have 2.6.10-rc2-mm3 kernel with u32 compiled as module. I have the cls_u32 module loaded. I have different binaryes of tc, the one from iproute packaged from debian sarge, the Kaber's one from trash.net,

Re: [LARTC] jdg-qos-script on FC3

On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 17:49, Ed Wildgoose wrote: bryan wrote: Hello, Has anyone had any luck compiling Alexander's QOS script on a vanilla FC3 or FC2 box? I just cant seem to get the darn thing to port right. I'm not using FC anything, but I found some problems using kernel 2.6