Re: [LARTC] tc filter syntax (and general noobness)

2007-09-07 Thread Michal Soltys
Vadtec wrote: ... protocol 6 match u32 0xff534d42 0x at nexthdr+23 flowid 2:50 ... Using nexthdr+ in as simple way as above won't work. U32 won't automatically adjust for the proper offset, you have to do it manually with another u32 filter, using "link" option. It's very well exp

[LARTC] tc filter syntax (and general noobness)

2007-09-07 Thread Vadtec
Ok, After much research and e-mails to the list, I'm finally to the point where I have filtering setup properly. Now, I'm trying to figure out tc filter so that I can classify packets on both eth0 and eth1. So, lets take for example Samba traffic. I want to be sure that its being sent with

[LARTC] Prioritizing VOIP traffic without sacrificing throughput

2007-09-07 Thread Stefanie Tellex
Hi, I would like to prioritize VOIP traffic when we use the phone, but other times not do traffic shaping at all. Right now I have my openwrt router set up with htb to do shaping. In order to get it to work well I had to set my upload and download speeds much lower than my line speed. With thes

Re: [LARTC] iproute: add destination route by hostname...

2007-09-07 Thread Martin A. Brown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings Hever, : How to add a static route to a hostname with iproute2? : : I tried: : ip route add linux.com via 192.168.1.1 : : I got the following reply: : Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "linux.com". : : With "route com

Re: [LARTC] HTB does not respect the prio parameter

2007-09-07 Thread Justin Schoeman
Is quantum not perhaps a bit high? Try setting it lower, and see what happens? -justin On 2007-08-29 08:06, Martin Björnsson wrote: Hi all, I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me results I expect. I've created 4 HTB classes: 1:10 TCP ACKs

Re: [LARTC] About "b" meaning "byte" and bit

2007-09-07 Thread DervishD
Hi Andy :) * Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > DervishD wrote: > >Yes, I already knew that, what I was asking is why SI units are not > >used and "shortcuts" are used instead: see my original message, I was > >not sure if kilobit was being used correctly (meaning 1000 bits) or if