Hi, how does gre tunnels handle the TOS/DS field in the
encapsulated packet? Is the value copied to the encapsulating ip
header?
thx jason___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Hi, how do you nat an address pool that is routed to a
router but the router does not have/contain that network.
For example:
[isp 1.2.3.4] --[customer router
1.2.3.5]-[dmz network]
[route for 200.0.0.0/x get sent to customer
router this address pool is assigned to customer, the
Hi, our network has a hand
full of 2k servers that use silent rip. We use 2 Linux gateways with separate
isp's.
Each gateway does a ' default-originate'
to advertise its default route in ripv2(with on having a different
metric).
The main gateway has a ping script written
in shell that will
/06, comp.techs
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, our network has a hand
full of 2k servers that use silent rip. We use 2 Linux gateways with separate
isp's.
Each gateway does a ' default-originate'
to advertise its default route in ripv2(with on having a different
metric
Hi, below are some test results from implementing a prio qdisc 'that is
also below'.The qdisc is attacted to a vlan interface for my external
network. Both tests were runat the same time.The links are policed at
6.0M 'by our provider'.
192.168.70.1 -- 192.168.30.1
My question is: If using a
: comp.techsCc:
lartc@mailman.ds9a.nlSubject: Re: [LARTC]
Gred/dsmark/htb
comp.techs wrote: Hi, I am trying to get assured
forwarding/expedited forwarding with gred and htb working. Below is the script I
am using. The following steps are what I thing is how the script works.
My problem
Title: [LARTC] multicast over GRE tunnel
Hi, if this is for the
purpose of using OSPF. You must setup Point-to-Point interfaces. That is when
giving your local gre tunnel ip address you must also specify a peer
address.
jason
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of
Steve EckmannSent:
Hi, just wondering if this type of configuration would be
possible for using AF and EF classes.
HTB (6.0M)
--GRED 5 (AF1)
--HTB(1M) [is it
possible to have this with a 1M rate and a 6M ceiling?]
--GRED [3 greds using grio]
VQ1 -3
--GRED 4 (AF2)
--HTB(1M)
--GRED
VQ1 -3
--GRED 3
Hi, what would be the easiest way to mark packets for AF.
For example ingress www traffic being marked as
AF31?
thx jason___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Hi, I have setup a ECMP route between
two linux systems. I do not have the equalize enabled. This would be flow based.
After sending a few ftp/scp sessions I noticed that the 'per flow based' was
jumping between interfaces for just one session.
My question is, would this be a result of the
Title: [LARTC] ip route mpath rr problem
Hi, I have been trying to do
something simular using 2 gre tunnels between linux routers. I have used Policy
based routing with seperate routing tables, with kernel patches such as http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#multigw.
I also tried both per flow/per
Hi, is there any way to route traffic between 2 ECMP routes
dependent on the current utilization(packet loss/bandwidth)?
For example using OSPF on 2 linux routers with ECMP
gre tunnels between them. If the bandwidth on one tunnel starts to exceed a
given value the "mechanism" will start sending
Hi, I have 2 routers that are connected using 2 gre
tunnels over ipsec, and ospf. Ospf sets up the equal cost
route, but uses the 'equalize' in the route. Is
there a way to remove/disable packet based load balancing? I would
just like to do a flow based load
balance?
thx
Hi, I have set up multipath routing using two gre tunnels.
The multipath routes are setup via (zebra/ospf).
I managed to modify zebra not to include the
'equalize' in the multpath route, and set theweights 1:2.
My question is that after doing 4+ ftp transfers I still do not see much traffic on
gone by.On 10/26/05, comp.techs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Hi, I am tring to us ip route to load balance between two
interfaces. ip route add equalize 10.200.1.0/24
nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev neta nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev
neta2 Where neta and neta2 are gre tunnels. Testing
show that packets
for the first packet, packets going
tothat same host will go through the same interface till the cachingtime
has gone by.On 10/26/05, comp.techs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Hi, I am tring to us ip route to load balance between two
interfaces. ip route add equalize 10.200.1.0/24
nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev
Hi, I am tring to us ip route to load balance between
two interfaces.
ip route add equalize 10.200.1.0/24 nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev neta nexthop
via 10.200.0.2 dev neta2
Where neta and neta2 are gre tunnels.Testing show that
packets travel in a single sided manner.
Do I need to use the
Hi, I have two systems eachwith 2 two gre tunnels
over ipsec. The tunnels are setup to loadbalance using 'ip route'.
Using ping from one server to the other I get equal
results via the two gre tunnels, but when I try a large ftp transfer the
utilization of one tunnel is 90% and the other 10%.
Hi, I have the following setup. Two
linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec
[transport].
Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and
10.200.1.0/24 network traffic.
Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf
on one and ping from the other. The results
Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two
[test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport].
Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and
10.200.1.0/24 network traffic.
Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf
on one and ping from the other. The results would
Hi, I have the following setup. Two
linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec
[transport].
Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and
10.200.1.0/24 network traffic.
Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf
on one and ping from the other. The results
21 matches
Mail list logo
