network(using
tcng)
and it seems to work (it work one day without errors).
Today i'm going to configure upload too.
The difference i could see at once is that there is no connection loss
when
i'm starting htb.
- Original Message -
From: devik [EMAIL PROTECTED
From the stats is seems that no data are queued - as if nobody
is sending them. You are using smp kernel, is your box SMP ?
I haven't seen many smp+htb boxes thus there might be possibility
of a bug...
devik
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've attached outputs for eth0 and eth1
data/rules. But I can admit
that this 5x drop is rather big and unfortunate.
devik
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
I see you have cburst 0 ! It is not allowed
and is described in docs. What was commands to
create the classes ?
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Michael Vasilenko wrote:
devik ([EMAIL
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
to that its result is always
approximate.
I just did quick look to code and all seems ok to me.
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Mindaugas Riauba wrote:
I have some strange problems
inner subclass (SFQ) probably WILL have smaller counts
when shaping.
inner class or leaf ? Regarding HTB's rate counter - it
is averaged over long time to that its result is always
approximate.
Counters were read from SFQ qdisc. But HTB class counters
difference is practically the
if NIC can't send packet (error).
If you think there is bug then test with routing setup first,
I have no time to test with bridge.
devik
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Mindaugas Riauba wrote:
inner subclass (SFQ) probably WILL have smaller counts
when shaping.
inner class or leaf ? Regarding
Hello all,
Two oopses were found by zhaoyao and Daniel Blueman. Patch against
2.4.23 and 2.6.0-test10 is here. It will be included in next kernel
releases of course.
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik
).
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
--- tc/q_htb.c Sun May 12 22:18:27 2002
+++ /tmp/q_htb.cSat Oct 18 00:05:18 2003
@@ -34,10 +34,14 @@
default minor id of class to which unclassified packets
Hi,
someone would like to do some work and change tc to
add packet overhead parameter to HTB ? Thus is size
is smaller than X then cap it to X
Users want it but no time here :-\
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http
sending RTP packets,
am I right or do I miss something ?
thanks, devik
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Lawrence MacIntyre wrote:
If you are using RTP for the session, you may also use RTCP as a
back-channel for reception reports. However, this is not required.
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 19:59, devik wrote
at
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Yes I agree with you regarding zero queue size. I plan
to make patch similar to your proposal. I hope it will
be today.
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
devik
lead to following hypothesis:
Classe's child qdisc is replaced while old one still has nonzero queue.
New empty qdisc is grafted under class instead. What about attached
patch (it is against my latest version so you can see offset warnings) ?
devik
--- sch_htb.c 2003/07/05 10:37:11 1.21
in its sub-qdisc
but when we actually decide to dequeue - it has no packet.
It is weird - can qdisc lose packets even when dequeue was
not called ??
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003
Uytkownik devik napisa:
Well. The right way for your case would be to limit single
subqueue in SFQ. See line 24 of attached patch - and try patch
itself.
devik
hmm.. with pfifo_fast is thesame problem - no drops... and unstable. It
doesn't look like a SFQ-specific problem. With fifo
might need to increase wmem.
Note that the problem occur only when you have qdisc on the same machine
as sending app.
devik
Should I set specific parameter somewhere or set something in network
configuration, or maybe recompile the kernel with a specific option?
Sergiusz
Uytkownik devik
Well. The right way for your case would be to limit single
subqueue in SFQ. See line 24 of attached patch - and try patch
itself.
devik
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Sergiusz Brzeziski wrote:
Uytkownik devik napisa:
I did pfifo with limit 10 and HTB started to work. I noticed drops and
rate was OK
management which counts packets
in qdisc and backs off. It MIGHT cause problems ...
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Sergiusz Brzeziski wrote:
Thak you for your hints!
1) 6kbit is really
latter.
thanks,
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
On Sat, 2003-07-05 at 03:09, Mike Mestnik wrote:
I use MRTG to graph tc -d output, so the debug_dump fills up my dmesg logs ect.
It's just
annoying
?) on how to setup hash
tables ...
I hope I didn't make mistake in my ideas - maybe Alexey
will correct it.
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
On 2 Jul 2003, Trevor Warren wrote:
Hello Folks,
Some time ago i
Hi,
I've attached patch which is submitted for .22 and should fix
some dequeue-bug warnings. It is not critical but I'll be happy
if you test it.
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
--- linux-2.4.21/net/sched
mm - I'm on holidays just now. Stef, could you test
the case whether you can crash it too ?
* Till 2000 Classes with 1 u32 Filter per class on my DEV=ETH0 it works
fine.
* Above 2000 Classes and Filters i have some kernel oops...;)
* Machine just stalls / Freezes when i try to run a script
associated to the queue with highest prio? And how is this done??
this queue is used when you explicitly direct data to
X:0 class (by filter) or when used in default 0.
devik
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo
:) You want stats to
move in realtime in your www page.
So yes then ok :-)
devik
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
- you
can have last minute in secs resolution, then last hour
in minutes resolution etc...
devik
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Quantum is used only for leaves.
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
Query:
In HTB, is the quantum parameter used for non leaf classes, or it is
meaningful only for leaf classes?
Doing
tc -s -d class show
.
Seems like if w2k sometimes reads bad data from hdd .. When I resolve
it I'll let you know.
devik
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
(30842881) matched at 57233411 (off 0)
block 88076292:97873920(9797629) matched at 88080387 (off 4095)
The offset 0 at line 5 is because we resumed download
from that point.
From TCP stream, 4095 bytes is missing at some places, see:
[devik@devix]$ hexdump -f /hfmt -s 43032570 -n 16 xxx.ok
2909ffa: b7
aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
added to http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/
FAQ section.
---
Martin Devera aka devik
Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl
. It might help.
Well I'd prefer to leave that to professionals :). Who is packet
filters maintainer? Alexey Kuznetsov?
Filters ?? If you mean qos classifiers (badly named filters in tc tool)
then yes, Alexey. If you mean iptables then I'm not sure.
devik
.
Setting HZ back to 100 fixed the problem.
Is this some bug in HTB or HZ has to be set to 100?
It should not be. I used it too. But I don't know
variable-HZ patch - it might affect something of course.
devik
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Hi All,
I'd like to apologize that I forwarded copy of my yesterday
mail to the list. Probably I haven't understood author right
- I still don't know ...
In any case there was too many emotions on my side and it is
not good (I should work less and sleep more). No flames please.
devik
quantum 500 on the line to get rid of the message.
devik
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi,
please is someone willing to gine me SSH account
on some server with .DE nd .NL reverse DNS ?
Replies to private mail please.
Thanks,
devik
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http
Download latest HTB3 TGZ from luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/
and you can use binary from there. Alexey prepared oficial
iproute2 package but he is busy until November ..
devik
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
HTB3 backport from 2.4 to 2.2
we have to use new tc tool for htb3
podrobnosti
na www.cstug.cz/slt/02/.
devik
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
there is other (Patrick's) version which is iptables ready.
The original (my) IMQ device is like any other device regarding
ipchanins.
devik
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi stef;
imq patch of 2.2.17 form http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/imq.htm
diff against 2.2.17
Can you
it (for
fun or for money).
devik
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Michael O'Shea wrote:
devik,
But this is my problem - I don't want bw per connection = total/n ... I want
bw per connection = x, where x is a constant fraction of total. So for n
connections total bw utilised = n*x = total.
rgds, Michael
Ehh it is the same for 2 years. luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ ..
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Jingsong Fu wrote:
Hi Devik,
Where can I find the HTB source code for kernel and tc?
Thanks,
Jingsong
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Hi,
for those who haven't realized it yet. It is in 2.4.20pre2,
2.5.xx, should go into new iproute2 package and I have informations
about possibility to have it in 2.2 soon.
devik
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl
Hi Jacob,
please can you post the htb tcng patch to LARTC list ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would test it in real environment ...
thanks, devik
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| - Does tcng support HTB ? syntax ?
|
| Not yet. Someone's working
, shl and or can be interleaved with f() and thus
they latency can be hidden. But even i 7 inst case we have
complexity n*7 where n is zero-population of x. Because
there is often one or two zero bits in x we have complexity
at most 14 cycles. Compare it with 128.
devik
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Huang Xin
filter attached
to 1:1. It can't be done. default is resolved as last instance
and MUST point to a LEAF. No other resolution is done then.
To solve your prob use catchall u32 filter (src 0.0.0.0 0 f.e.).
on 1: and flowid 1:1.
devik
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Mon
46 matches
Mail list logo
