Hi Martin!
I just applied the bridge-nf and ebtables patches and tried it and I can
match packets in the mangle table as usual (also have to use FORWARD for
packets passing through the machine).
> Ack! I meant to say:
>
>"It sounds like you are running bridging without the netfilter hooks.
Hi Martin!
> : No, I'm not running with ebtables+nf support. From what I understand
> : (and please correct me if I'm wrong), patching the kernel with
> : ebtables+bridge-nf, you get an ebtables table with BROUTING, FORWARD,
> : and NAT chains which you can match traffic on.
> :
> : However,
Ack! I meant to say:
"It sounds like you are running bridging without the netfilter hooks."
But, of course, you understood what I meant.
: No, I'm not running with ebtables+nf support. From what I understand
: (and please correct me if I'm wrong), patching the kernel with
: ebtables+brid
Hi Martin!
No, I'm not running with ebtables+nf support. From what I understand (and
please correct me if I'm wrong), patching the kernel with
ebtables+bridge-nf, you get an ebtables table with BROUTING, FORWARD, and
NAT chains which you can match traffic on.
However, I need to match traffic in t
It sounds like you are running bridging with the netfilter hooks.
See the section at the bottom of the page on bridging + firewalling
(really netfilter hooks):
http://bridge.sourceforge.net/download.html
And of course, the newest patches here:
http://users.pandora.be/bart.de.schuymer/ebtabl
Hi!
If I create the following setup:
66.8.28.52/2966.8.28.51/29
+--+ +--+
| PC A |--+ +-| PC B |
+--+ | | +--+
| |
eth1| | eth0
+-+
| qos | (br0 = 66.8.28.49/
