On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 22:10, Martin Friebe laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
3) 'Folding'/'Divider' buttons are slightly confusing. Maybe it is
better to make common list
of language constructs with additional 'Fold' checkbox, and make it
visible only when needed?
Alternatively, how about at least
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, don't you think that per-type divider coloring is an overkill?
Perhaps a single color on Colors page would be sufficient?
I think it's pretty neat. And if you don't want it, simply don't use
it. By default all
Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 22:10, Martin Friebe laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
3) 'Folding'/'Divider' buttons are slightly confusing. Maybe it is
better to make common list
of language constructs with additional 'Fold' checkbox, and make it
visible only when needed?
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:56, Martin Friebe laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
Sorry, no patch from me, but I can create an issue if you want.
I have no problems with a separate page,
but why do you reject a common list? It seems the best solution to me.
Dividers initially could only be set at
Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:56, Martin Friebe laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
Sorry, no patch from me, but I can create an issue if you want.
I have no problems with a separate page,
but why do you reject a common list? It seems the best solution to me.
Dividers
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
This relates to the new bug report:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13322
Code Folding seems to have gone way overboard! It simply makes the
editor look like a mess at the moment (Lazarus svn trunk revision).
What is the end goal of code folding?
