Am 2013-03-13 18:58, schrieb Juha Manninen:
For me it works correctly. I just tested.
Shure? All anchor references in the changed object were retained
but references in other (not changed) objects that used the changed
object were gone.
Maybe I find some time to investigate more in it but as
On 03/14/2013 12:09 AM, Benito van der Zander wrote:
However, I still get frequent, random segfaults when calling Windows
functions. My current attempt, as simple as I can make it, is below.
About 50% of the time, the first command in the execute procedure
works fine; the other times it
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:52:59 +0100
Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
What fixes branch are you talking about? FPC 2.6 fixes or Lazarus 1.0 fixes?
In the next release we should mention that it uses a newer
compiler, which includes many bug fixes, but contains a few
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Jürgen Hestermann
juergen.hesterm...@gmx.de wrote:
Shure? All anchor references in the changed object were retained
but references in other (not changed) objects that used the changed
object were gone.
You are right. I was testing it the other way around. It is
The workaround is to manually edit also the .lfm file.
Changing the same type in both .pas and .lfm files works, although it
may complain about non-existent properties the first time you open it.
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Am 14.03.2013 09:28, schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:52:59 +0100
Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
What fixes branch are you talking about? FPC 2.6 fixes or Lazarus 1.0 fixes?
In the next release we should mention that it uses a newer
compiler, which
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:40:31 +0200
Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com wrote:
The workaround is to manually edit also the .lfm file.
Changing the same type in both .pas and .lfm files works, although it
may complain about non-existent properties the first time you open it.
Keeping
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:41:18 +0100
Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 14.03.2013 09:28, schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:52:59 +0100
Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
What fixes branch are you talking about? FPC 2.6 fixes or Lazarus
On 13/03/2013 17:27, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Anyway, you have to change your code to the following.
GCache.ClientHeight := GCache.ClientHeight - (DefaultRowHeight *
FooterRowCount + 2);
... which is sort of more readable than Dec() construct Frank was using,
(but it is IMOTMV only) ...
On 2013-03-14 11:11, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
GCache.ClientHeight := GCache.ClientHeight - (DefaultRowHeight *
FooterRowCount + 2);
... which is sort of more readable than Dec() construct Frank was using,
(but it is IMOTMV only) ...
[personal opinion]
I agree fully. I don't really like
i think you'll be better off developing in C.
Dont waste your time with lazarus/freepascal when it comes to embedded
systems.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 13 March 2013 17:20, Frank Church vfcli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 March 2013 16:52, Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/3/13 Frank Church vfcli...@gmail.com:
Upgrading to Lazarus 1.0.7 with FPC 2.6.2 raised this error in a file
I was compiling? What does it mean?
On 14 March 2013 14:08, Graeme Geldenhuys gra...@geldenhuys.co.uk wrote:
On 2013-03-14 11:11, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
GCache.ClientHeight := GCache.ClientHeight - (DefaultRowHeight *
FooterRowCount + 2);
... which is sort of more readable than Dec() construct Frank was using,
(but it is
On 2013-03-14 14:42, Frank Church wrote:
domain better. For instance if you are iterating over an array where
elements are referenced by an integers, +1, +2 etc give the impression
your program involves number arithmetic, where as Next and Prev, or
And why I created and use an Iterator unit,
Am 14.03.2013 15:25, schrieb Frank Church:
On 13 March 2013 17:20, Frank Church vfcli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 March 2013 16:52, Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/3/13 Frank Church vfcli...@gmail.com:
Upgrading to Lazarus 1.0.7 with FPC 2.6.2 raised this error in a file
Am 14.03.2013 12:11, schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
I also believe the new FPC changes also means that with properties you
also can't use the short *= += -= etc syntax, which I loved to use. The
above would have been written as
GCache.ClientHeight -= (DefaultRowHeight * FooterRowCount + 2);
and
On 14/03/2013 16:35, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 14.03.2013 12:11, schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
I also believe the new FPC changes also means that with
properties you also can't use the short *= += -= etc syntax,
which I loved to use. The above would have been written as
GCache.ClientHeight -=
Mattias Gaertner ha scritto:
Please create a bug report with an example.
I'm currently at a customer site. I'll do it as soon as I'm back home.
Giuliano
--
Giuliano Colla
Whenever people agree with me, I always feel I must be wrong (O. Wilde)
--
Totally disagree (when there is no need to meet a deadline) ;-) ;-)
The implementation is still a little rough but growing knowledge by
working low level has it's own appeal.
And microcontrollers (at least when they are a hobby) should be fun, and
I do not want to ruin this fun with huge
I second that.
On 3/14/2013 1:11 PM, Michael Ring wrote:
Totally disagree (when there is no need to meet a deadline) ;-) ;-)
The implementation is still a little rough but growing knowledge by
working low level has it's own appeal.
And microcontrollers (at least when they are a hobby)
I've used Lazarus 0.9.30 for 2 years to compile e execute a WinCE arm
application. I been used the Project|Project Options|Code generation to control
the target platform destination for generate the executable program.
In the next week I installed Lazarus 1.0.6. I pretend to migrate my old
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:25:43 +0100
Arí Ricardo Ody ar...@gmx.com wrote:
I've used Lazarus 0.9.30 for 2 years to compile e execute a WinCE arm
application. I been used the Project|Project Options|Code generation to
control the target platform destination for generate the executable program.
On 13.03.2013 19:08, Frank Church wrote:
On 13 March 2013 17:50, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 13.03.2013 18:43 schrieb Frank Church vfcli...@gmail.com:
On 13 March 2013 17:22, Graeme Geldenhuys gra...@geldenhuys.co.uk wrote:
On 2013-03-13 16:29, Juha Manninen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:03:22PM +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
On 13.03.2013 19:08, Frank Church wrote:
https://forums.embarcadero.com/message.jspa?messageID=535727
Graeme was rather mild in that discussion, not the usual Graeme :).
The Embarcadero guys were just laughable, not confidence
Hi All,
While I use auto complete of a property, the IDE inserts := for me
automatically, this is good, but how can I make it auto insert a SPACE
before the colon so that I don't need to get back and insert it myself
everytime?
Thanks
--
___
Lazarus
Hi,
While single-stepping. I would like to check some data with the
Evaluate/Modify tool, for example view the count of a stringlist, I get:
Type TSTRINGLIST = class has no component named COUNT.
As a matter of fact, I get this kind of thing with most variables, except
simple stuff like
On 15/03/2013 02:14, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
Hi,
While single-stepping. I would like to check some data with the
Evaluate/Modify tool, for example view the count of a stringlist, I get:
Type TSTRINGLIST = class has no component named COUNT.
As a matter of fact, I get this kind of thing with
On 15/03/2013 02:42, stdreamer wrote:
On 15/3/2013 3:56 πμ, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
Hi All,
While I use auto complete of a property, the IDE inserts := for me
automatically, this is good, but how can I make it auto insert a SPACE
before the colon so that I don't need to get back and insert it
No:
Check Insert Space in FRONT of Symbol
That's the effect I want. thanks.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
29 matches
Mail list logo