"Recompiling contnrs, checksum changed for System
masks.pas(29,22) Fatal: Can't find unit contnrs used by Masks"
Since many weeks I get this error when trying to recompile the newest
svn version of Lazarus with the newest svn Version of FPC.
I remember that I once had this problem and it was
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 02:09:52PM +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
> "Recompiling contnrs, checksum changed for System
>masks.pas(29,22) Fatal: Can't find unit contnrs used by Masks"
>
> Since many weeks I get this error when trying to recompile the newest
> svn version of Lazarus with the newe
On 12/03/2010 02:29 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
IOW it is not a bug of the compiler, but a mistake in installing the system.
I see,
But how to overcome this ? I.e.: do a clean new install from the svn ?
Thanks,
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing li
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 05:13:30PM +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 12/03/2010 02:29 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> >
> > IOW it is not a bug of the compiler, but a mistake in installing the system.
>
> I see,
>
> But how to overcome this ? I.e.: do a clean new install from the svn ?
Don't mi
On 03/12/2010 13:09, Michael Schnell wrote:
"Recompiling contnrs, checksum changed for System
masks.pas(29,22) Fatal: Can't find unit contnrs used by Masks"
Since many weeks I get this error when trying to recompile the newest
svn version of Lazarus with the newest svn Version of FPC.
I rem
On 12/03/2010 08:10 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Don't mix versions unless you know very well what you are doing.
I am not aware of using any mixes versions.
The installed FPC version is the one from the svn. To compile same I do
have an old version of FPC, but same is not installed, but ref
2010/12/9 Michael Schnell :
> On 12/03/2010 08:10 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>>
>> Don't mix versions unless you know very well what you are doing.
>
> I am not aware of using any mixes versions.
>
> The installed FPC version is the one from the svn. To compile same I do have
> an old version of
On 12/03/2010 08:22 PM, Martin wrote:
On 03/12/2010 13:09, Michael Schnell wrote:
What do do, depends on how you got into the error.
Did you update FPC?
Yep from the svn
Did you install a 2nd newer version of fpc in parallel to the 1st fpc?
No. I only have an old version (that is not installe
On 12/09/2010 11:30 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
You did not try the things that Martin suggested?
Not yet (see my mail to Martin)...
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman
You can run Lazarus from console or with logfile (--debug-log=xxx)
Or you can "copy all and hidden) on the msg vie window (popup menu)
Any of this 3 should give you additional info about the output that fpc
generates
On 09/12/2010 10:46, Michael Schnell wrote:
Check what fpc compiler lazarus
Am 09.12.2010 11:46, schrieb Michael Schnell:
> which fpc
/usr/local/bin/fpc
> /usr/local/bin/fpc
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.5.1 [2010/12/03] for i386
Copyright (c) 1993-2010 by Florian Klaempfl
/usr/lib/fpc/2.5.1/ppc386 [options] [options]
This doesn't match! /usr/bin/fpc should be called
On 12/09/2010 02:42 PM, Martin wrote:...
I'll give all this a try ASAP.
Thanks a lot !
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 09.12.2010 11:46, Michael Schnell wrote:
>> Did you update FPC?
> Yep from the svn
If you do a make install it might *not* replace an existing compiler
binary at /usr/bin/
I once had the same problem, I was updating from svn and did not notice
that after make install it did not replace the bi
On 12/11/2010 11:57 PM, Bernd Kreuss wrote:
If you do a make install it might *not* replace an existing compiler
binary at /usr/bin/
I did check this by doing:
> /usr/bin/fpc
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.5.1 [2010/12/09] for i386
This obviously starts the current fpc.
I also doublechecked
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:44:30 +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/11/2010 11:57 PM, Bernd Kreuss wrote:
If you do a make install it might *not* replace an existing compiler
binary at /usr/bin/
I did check this by doing:
/usr/bin/fpc
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.5.1 [2010/12/09] for i386
T
On 12/16/2010 10:05 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
(fpc -va)
Thanks a lot. This results in
[0.019] Configfile search: /home/mschnell/.fpc.cfg
[0.019] Configfile search: /usr/lib/fpc/etc/fpc.cfg
[0.019] Configfile search: /etc/fpc.cfg
[0.019] Reading options from file /etc/fpc.cfg
[0.019] Star
2010/12/16 Michael Schnell :
> On 12/16/2010 10:05 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
>>
>> (fpc -va)
>>
>>
>
> Thanks a lot. This results in
>
> [0.019] Configfile search: /home/mschnell/.fpc.cfg
> [0.019] Configfile search: /usr/lib/fpc/etc/fpc.cfg
> [0.019] Configfile search: /etc/fpc.cfg
> [0.019] R
On 12/16/2010 10:57 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
do you suggest I should check /etc/fpc.cfg
YES.
Thanks, I'll do so ASAP.
(which supposedly is rewritten
by any new fpc install)
This is an incorrect assumption.
Hmm. how else would have been written there. I do the compiling and
installin
2010/12/16 Michael Schnell :
>>> (which supposedly is rewritten
>>> by any new fpc install)
>>
>> This is an incorrect assumption.
>>
> Hmm. how else would have been written there. I do the compiling and
> installing of fpc as root, but I always start Lazarus as a normal user. So
> only installing
On 12/16/2010 11:17 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hmm. how else would have been written there. I do the compiling and
installing of fpc as root, but I always start Lazarus as a normal user. So
only installing fpc has been able to write to /etc.
Maybe the file is from a previous install?
Not tha
16.12.2010 17:25, Michael Schnell wrote:
I did suppose that always when after doing "make all", I do "make
install" (as root) on fpc, same would rewrite all non-user-specific fpc
files and /etc/fpc.cfg being one of those.
"make install" does not rewrite your fpc.cfg nor replace a symlink to
fp
On 12/17/2010 03:08 AM, Paul Ishenin wrote:
"make install" does not rewrite your fpc.cfg nor replace a symlink to
fpc executable.
Thanks for letting me know.
But now I don't know who put it into /etc.
Should I just remove it ?
What fpc.cfg file is Lazarus supposed to use (when compiling its
Am 17.12.2010 09:30, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 12/17/2010 03:08 AM, Paul Ishenin wrote:
"make install" does not rewrite your fpc.cfg nor replace a symlink to
fpc executable.
Thanks for letting me know.
But now I don't know who put it into /etc.
It might be from the last relased that you
On 12/17/2010 11:31 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Should I just remove it ?
Might be the wisest solution.
renamed it and now I get:
"Clean Lazarus Source" completed
Fatal: Can't find unit system used by AllLCLUnits
I suppose now no fpc.cfg file at all is in charge any more:
fpc -va -->
[0.001] Con
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:39:33 +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/17/2010 11:31 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Should I just remove it ?
Might be the wisest solution.
renamed it and now I get:
"Clean Lazarus Source" completed
Fatal: Can't find unit system used by AllLCLUnits
I suppose now no fpc.cfg
On 12/16/2010 11:17 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Maybe the file is from a previous install?
This seems like true.
Now I found a better fpc.cfg still sitting in /etc that I once renamed.
This gets me much further when compiling Lazarus, but I get:
/home/mschnell/Downloads/svn/lazarus/trunk/ex
2011/1/3 Michael Schnell :
> On 12/16/2010 11:17 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
>>
>> Maybe the file is from a previous install?
>
> This seems like true.
>
> Now I found a better fpc.cfg still sitting in /etc that I once renamed.
>
> This gets me much further when compiling Lazarus, but I get:
>
> /h
On 01/03/2011 03:54 PM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
revert to revision 28849 until
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18375 has been fixed.
OK. I can wait :-) .
Or don't build the examples.
If I do "Build LCL" the compilation works.
If I do "Build IDE" with or (without Packages) I get
"Cl
Michael Schnell schrieb:
If I do "Build LCL" the compilation works.
If I do "Build IDE" with or (without Packages) I get
"Clean Lazarus Source" completed
/home/mschnell/Downloads/svn/lazarus/trunk/components/codetools/ctxmlfixfragment.pas(1,1)
Fatal: Can't find unit LazarusPackageIntf used by
On 01/04/2011 06:13 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Best you build clean *everything* except the examples (some examples
may not compile from time to time).
I don't see how to do this (and of course they already are cleaned as I
already did "clean and build all").
So I'll just wait until the
2011/1/5 Michael Schnell :
> I don't see how to do this (and of course they already are cleaned as I
> already did "clean and build all").
>
> So I'll just wait until the problem is fixed.
If I understood what you need, in Build profiles, you can choose what
build or not. In the last row there is
On 01/05/2011 11:37 AM, Kjow wrote:
If I understood what you need, in Build profiles, you can choose what
build or not...
Sorry for having bothered you with this. Silly me did not see the right
tab of the "configure build" dialog that gets me to the advanced options.
Now I switched off buildi
Hi Hans Peter and other Experts,
As I wrote some days ago, after, with your kind help, being able to
rebuild Lazarus, I get a "SIGSEGV"error when creating a new empty
project and starting it.
After some testing I found that I can run a new empty gtk2 project (even
after adding some controls
Because this thread is called 'Can't find unit contnrs used by
Masks', I will answer to this:
The IDE now warns if fpc has no config file and can not find any ppu
files.
Mattias
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://li
On 01/11/2011 03:18 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Because this thread is called 'Can't find unit contnrs used by
Masks', I will answer to this:
The IDE now warns if fpc has no config file and can not find any ppu
files.
I did replace the seemingly corrupted fpc.cfg in /etc by some old one I
foun
35 matches
Mail list logo