[Lazarus] What is GeckoPort version 2 status?

2012-11-02 Thread Maxim Ganetsky
Hello. As far as I can see latest SVN version of GeckoPort version 2 is broken. It cannot be compiled via Lazarus package (e.g. each-version directory is missing). Also GeckoPort version 2 cannot be installed via FpPkg (at least with FPC 2.6.1). What's its status? Will it be fixed? Is it usa

Re: [Lazarus] What is GeckoPort version 2 status?

2013-01-11 Thread Joost van der Sluis
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 02:39 +0400, Maxim Ganetsky wrote: > As far as I can see latest SVN version of GeckoPort version 2 is broken. > It cannot be compiled via Lazarus package (e.g. each-version directory > is missing). Also GeckoPort version 2 cannot be installed via FpPkg (at > least with FPC

Re: [Lazarus] What is GeckoPort version 2 status?

2013-01-18 Thread Joost van der Sluis
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 04:14 +0400, Maxim Ganetsky wrote: > 11.01.2013 19:50, Joost van der Sluis пишет: > > On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 02:39 +0400, Maxim Ganetsky wrote: > >> As far as I can see latest SVN version of GeckoPort version 2 is broken. > >> It cannot be compiled via Lazarus package (e.g. eac

Re: [Lazarus] What is GeckoPort version 2 status?

2013-01-18 Thread Maxim Ganetsky
18.01.2013 20:15, Joost van der Sluis пишет: On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 04:14 +0400, Maxim Ganetsky wrote: The problem is that GeckoPort v2 fails to compile. See full log: Could you try again? Now it compiles OK, thanks. For installation into Lazarus you have to supply the path of lazarus in yo

Re: [Lazarus] What is GeckoPort version 2 status?

2013-01-18 Thread Maxim Ganetsky
19.01.2013 1:47, Maxim Ganetsky пишет: 18.01.2013 20:15, Joost van der Sluis пишет: On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 04:14 +0400, Maxim Ganetsky wrote: The problem is that GeckoPort v2 fails to compile. See full log: Could you try again? Now it compiles OK, thanks. For installation into Lazarus you

Re: [Lazarus] What is GeckoPort version 2 status?

2013-01-18 Thread Joost van der Sluis
Sent from my phone, sorry for top posting. The error about the not existing dir is fixed in the latest lazmkunit package. Did you do an fppkg update, then fppkg install gecko? Maybe you need to explicitely update lazmkunit. (fppkg install lazmkunit)Op 18-01-13 22:47 schreef Maxim Ganetsky: 18.01

Re: [Lazarus] What is GeckoPort version 2 status?

2013-01-18 Thread Joost van der Sluis
H. I thought i fixed that. Maybe forgot to commit and package. Normally lazarus shows the error location. Cast the nativewindow (or something like that) to a thandle. You have to do this on two or three locations. I'll update the package tomorrow.. Op 18-01-13 23:38 schreef Maxim Ganetsky: 1

Re: [Lazarus] What is GeckoPort version 2 status?

2013-01-19 Thread Joost van der Sluis
> H. I thought i fixed that. Maybe forgot to commit and package. Normally > lazarus shows the error location. Cast the nativewindow (or something like > that) to a thandle. You have to do this on two or three locations. I'll > update > the package tomorrow.. > Free Pascal Compiler version

Re: [Lazarus] What is GeckoPort version 2 status?

2013-01-19 Thread Maxim Ganetsky
19.01.2013 16:39, Joost van der Sluis пишет: H. I thought i fixed that. Maybe forgot to commit and package. Normally lazarus shows the error location. Cast the nativewindow (or something like that) to a thandle. You have to do this on two or three locations. I'll update the package tomorrow..

Re: [Lazarus] What is GeckoPort version 2 status?

2013-01-19 Thread Joost van der Sluis
Could be the exception mask, which does not cooperate with javascript. You could try to experiment with that.Op 19-01-13 15:56 schreef Maxim Ganetsky: 19.01.2013 16:39, Joost van der Sluis пишет: >> H. I thought i fixed that. Maybe forgot to commit and package. Normally >> lazarus shows the er

Re: [Lazarus] What is GeckoPort version 2 status?

2013-01-20 Thread Maxim Ganetsky
20.01.2013 5:12, Joost van der Sluis пишет: Could be the exception mask, which does not cooperate with javascript. You could try to experiment with that. It is Access Violation. Backtrace is not very useful: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x02f1891f in xul!?GetVisibleRe